Physical Facilities for Learning Outcomes: A Study of Sindh Madressatul Islam University

Year : 2025 | Volume : 02 | Issue : 01 | Page : 38 45
    By

    Badee U Zaman Kehar,

  • Safdar Shah,

  1. Student Scholar, Department of Education, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi, Pakistan
  2. Student Scholar, Department of Education, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi, Pakistan

Abstract

The physical facilities are the significant features for ideal learning outcomes. The physical environment greatly influences students’ psychological, sociological, and intellectual growth, and we cannot ignore them in the postmodern world. For this purpose, the research was undertaken on physical facilities and their impacts on students’ learning outcomes at Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan. The study employed quantitative methodology, gathering information via surveys. There were 100 people in the sample. There were five departments with regular students enrolled. The results were obtained by applying a percentage formula to the data. The results showed that learning outcomes are greatly impacted by physical amenities. The vast majority of respondents concurred that a cozy and healthful environment is necessary for efficient learning, underscoring the need of well-maintained facilities in learning environments. The study emphasizes how spending on physical infrastructure can improve academic achievement, motivation, and student participation. Prioritizing excellent learning environments allows educational institutions to establish supportive places that foster student development, so reinforcing the crucial connection between the caliber of physical resources and academic achievement. In the end, this research encourages institutions to acknowledge the wider effects of physical surroundings on student accomplishment and overall development and promotes intentional upgrades in educational infrastructure to promote improved learning outcomes.

Keywords: Academic achievement, educational infrastructure, physical facilities, learning outcome, students

[This article belongs to International Journal of Education Sciences ]

How to cite this article:
Badee U Zaman Kehar, Safdar Shah. Physical Facilities for Learning Outcomes: A Study of Sindh Madressatul Islam University. International Journal of Education Sciences. 2025; 02(01):38-45.
How to cite this URL:
Badee U Zaman Kehar, Safdar Shah. Physical Facilities for Learning Outcomes: A Study of Sindh Madressatul Islam University. International Journal of Education Sciences. 2025; 02(01):38-45. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijes/article=2025/view=192373


References

  1. Kamaruddin R, Zainal NR, Aminuddin ZM, Jusoff K. The quality of learning environment and academic performance from a student’s perception. International journal of business and management. 2009 Apr;4(4):171-5.
  2. Asiyai RI. Assessing school facilities in public secondary schools in Delta State, Nigeria. African research review. 2012;6(2):192-205.
  3. Akomolafe CO, Adesua VO. The Impact of Physical Facilities on Students’ Level of Motivation and Academic Performance in Senior Secondary Schools in Southwest Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice. 2016;7(4):38-42.
  4. Cleveland B. Addressing the spatial to catalyse socio-pedagogical reform in middle years education. InThe translational design of schools: An evidence-based approach to aligning pedagogy and learning environments 2016 Jan 1 (pp. 27-49). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
  5. Crampton FE. Spending on school infrastructure: does money matter?. Journal of Educational Administration. 2009 May 8;47(3):305-22.
  6. Usen OM. Teachers’ Utilization of School Facilities and Academic Achievement of Student Nurses in Human Biology in Schools of Nursing in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice. 2016;7(16):73-80.
  7. Ranasinghe AI, Leisher D. The benefit of integrating technology into the classroom. InInternational Mathematical Forum 2009 (Vol. 4, No. 40, pp. 1955-1961).
  8. Ogunode NJ, Ibrahim GF. Impact of Infrastructure Facilities on the Implementation of Educational Administration and Planning Programme in Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Integrity and Curriculum Development. 2024 Jan 7;1(1):102-8.
  9. Ali N, Jusoff K, Ali S, Mokhtar N, Salamat AS. The factors influencing students’ performance at Universiti Teknologi MARA Kedah, Malaysia. Management Science and Engineering. 2009 Dec 1;3(4):81.
  10. Smoll FL, Smith RE. Children and Youth in Sport: A Biopsychosocial Perspective; Dubuque, IA: Kendall. Hunt Publishing Company. Sport Management Review. 2002; 14:311-26.
  11. Arshad M, Qamar ZA, Gulzar FH. Effects of physical facilities at public schools on students’ achievement in Punjab, Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review. 2018;3(4):102-13.
  12. Barrett M, Watene K, McNicholas P. Legal personality in Aotearoa New Zealand: an example of integrated thinking on sustainable development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2020 Oct 20;33(7):1705-30.
  13. Mulyasa E. Curriculum Development and Implementation 2013, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Ministry of Education and Culture, (2013). Development and Implementation of. 2013.
  14. Jarman D, Webb L, Chan TC. A beautiful school is a caring school. School Business Affairs. 2004 Jun; 70:37-8.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 02
Issue 01
Received 05/10/2024
Accepted 11/10/2024
Published 06/01/2025
464

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics