Relationship between Socio-Economic Status and New Word Learning

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n

n

n

n

Open Access

nn

n

n[/if 992]n

n

Year : August 5, 2024 at 4:26 pm | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume : [else] Volume :[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : | Page : –

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

[foreach 286]n

vector

n

n

Abhishek B.P,

n

    n t

  • n

n

n[/foreach]

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Assistant Professor All India Institute of Speech and Hearing (AIISH) Karnataka India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n

n

Abstract

nNew word learning refers to the process of learning of novel words which are not in the vocabulary of the person and it varies as a function of many potent variables. Socio economic status is one of the major variables believed to have a significant effect on new word learning. The aim of the current study to investigate if new word learning varies as a function of socio-economic status. 74 children (studying in 1st and 2nd grade) were recruited. Children were taken from two different schools and in addition to this the NIMH scale was also administered to elicit details regarding socio economic status (SES). The NIMH and school data were used to categorize children into groups according to their SES. Thirty uncommon nouns were asked to be named by the participants. The starting point score for each participant was 0. The names were told to the participants and testing was repeated immediately, this phase was termed as training phase. The testing was also carried out after 3 days post training. Scores obtained on the third day was taken into consideration for statistical analysis as it would reflect new word learning. Mann Whitney U test was administered and the statistic revealed a significant difference between children belonging to higher and lower SES with children belonging to higher socio-economic status performing better. This difference could be because of the rehearsal strategies adapted by children or follow up with parents.

n

n

n

Keywords: New words, Vocabulary, Strata, Fast Mapping, Socio Economic status

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to International Journal of Education Sciences(ijes)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in International Journal of Education Sciences(ijes)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Abhishek B.P. Relationship between Socio-Economic Status and New Word Learning. International Journal of Education Sciences. August 5, 2024; ():-.

n

How to cite this URL: Abhishek B.P. Relationship between Socio-Economic Status and New Word Learning. International Journal of Education Sciences. August 5, 2024; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijes/article=August 5, 2024/view=0

nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n

n[if 992 not_equal=’Open Access’] [/if 992]n

nn

nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

n

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  1. Swanborn MS, de Glopper K. Impact of reading purpose on incidental word learning from context. Language learning. 2002 Mar;52(1):95-117.
  2. Torgesen JK, Wagner RK, Rashotte CA. Test of word reading efficiency–second edition (TOWRE-2). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. 2012.
  3. Hoff E. Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: implications for closing achievement gaps. Developmental psychology. 2013 Jan;49(1):4.
  4. Hemphill L, Tivnan T. The importance of early vocabulary for literacy achievement in high-poverty schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk. 2008 Nov 10;13(4):426-51.
  5. Hayes AF, Slater MD, Snyder LB, editors. The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research. Sage; 2008.
  6. Nagy WE, Herman PA, Anderson RC. Learning words from context. Reading research quarterly. 1985 Jan 1:233-53.
  7. Steele SC, Watkins RV. Learning word meanings during reading by children with language learning disability and typically-developing peers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 2010 Jul 1;24(7):520-39.
  8. Storkel HL. A corpus of consonant–vowel–consonant real words and nonwords: Comparison of phonotactic probability, neighborhood density, and consonant age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods. 2013 Dec;45(4):1159-67.
  9. Ricketts J, Bishop DV, Pimperton H, Nation K. The role of self-teaching in learning orthographic and semantic aspects of new words. Scientific Studies of Reading. 2011 Jan 7;15(1):47-70.
  10. Fukkink RG, Blok H, De Glopper K. Deriving word meaning from written context: A multicomponential skill. Language Learning. 2001 Sep;51(3):477-96.
  11. Maguire MJ, Schneider JM, Middleton AE, Ralph Y, Lopez M, Ackerman RA, Abel AD. Vocabulary knowledge mediates the link between socioeconomic status and word learning in grade school. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2018 Feb 1;166:679-95.

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””][else]Ahead of Print[/if 424] Subscription Original Research

n

n

[if 2146 equals=”Yes”][/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”][/if 2146]n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 1748 not_equal=””]

[else]

[/if 1748]n

n

n

Volume
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424]
Received July 22, 2024
Accepted July 27, 2024
Published August 5, 2024

n

n

n

n

n

n nfunction myFunction2() {nvar x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);nif (x.style.display === “block”) {nx.style.display = “none”;n}nelse { x.style.display = “Block”; }n}ndocument.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(-1);n});ndocument.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(1);n});nvar slideIndex = 1;nshowSlides(slideIndex);nfunction changeSlides(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex += n));n}nfunction currentSlide(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex = n));n}nfunction showSlides(n) {nvar i;nvar slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);nvar dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);nif (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }nif (n (item.style.display = “none”));nArray.from(dots).forEach(nitem => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n);nslides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;ndots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n}n”}]