The Relationship Between Leadership Styles and Decision-Making: A Conceptual Study

Year : 2026 | Volume : 03 | Issue : 02 | Page : 89 96
By

Dipika Gupta,

Gunjan Gupta,

  1. Assistant Teacher, Department of Education, Rajkiya Uchch Madhyamik Vidyalaya Kunjalahi, Nautan, West Champaran, Bihar, India
  2. Assistant Teacher, Department of Education, Samvedna Project Girls Senior Secondary School Daudpur, Chhapra (Saran), Bihar, India

Abstract

Leadership plays a vital role in determining organizational effectiveness, particularly through its influence on decision-making processes. Effective decision-making is a fundamental managerial function that shapes organizational performance, strategic direction, and long-term sustainability. Leadership style, defined as the consistent pattern of behaviors adopted by leaders to influence and guide followers, significantly affects how decisions are formulated, communicated, and implemented within organizations. This conceptual paper examines the impact of three classical leadership styles—autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire on decision-making effectiveness through a comprehensive review of existing theoretical and empirical literature. The study adopted qualitative conceptual research design using secondary sources, which integrates the existing views about leadership behavior and decision making in the organization. The analysis reveals that autocratic leadership facilitates rapid decision-making and strong control, making it suitable for crisis situations, although it limits employee participation and creativity. Democratic leadership promotes collaboration, employee engagement, and higher-quality decisions by incorporating diverse perspectives; however, it may delay decision-making in time-sensitive situations. Laissez-faire leadership encourages autonomy, flexibility, and innovation among competent employees but may result in ambiguity, poor coordination, and inconsistent outcomes due to limited guidance. The results indicate that there is no “right” leadership style for every situation in an organization. Instead, effective leadership requires a situational approach in which leaders adapt their style according to organizational objectives, task complexity, environmental conditions, and employee competence. The study contributes to the theoretical understanding of the relationship between leadership styles and decision-making while providing practical implications for managers and organizational leaders seeking to enhance decision quality, employee participation, and overall organizational effectiveness.

Keywords: Leadership styles, decision-making, autocratic leadership, democratic leadership, laissez-faire leadership, organizational behavior

[This article belongs to International Journal of Behavioral Sciences ]

How to cite this article: Dipika Gupta, Gunjan Gupta. The Relationship Between Leadership Styles and Decision-Making: A Conceptual Study. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2026; 03(02):89-96.
How to cite this URL: Dipika Gupta, Gunjan Gupta. The Relationship Between Leadership Styles and Decision-Making: A Conceptual Study. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2026; 03(02):89-96. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijbsc/article=2026/view=261297

References

  1. Al-Aghbar L, Elshurafa O, Lowrey JS. Book review: Northouse & Lee (2019) Leadership case studies in education. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy. 2019 Jun 2(189).
  2. Avolio BJ, Bass BM. Multifactor leadership questionnaire (TM). Mind Garden, Inc. Menlo Park, CA. 2004:1–0.
  3. Bass BM, Bass Bernard M. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free press; 1985 May.
  4. Bolden R. Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International journal of management reviews. 2011 Sep;13(3):251–69.
  5. Day DV, Fleenor JW, Atwater LE, Sturm RE, McKee RA. Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. The leadership quarterly. 2014 Feb 1;25(1):63–82.
  6. Den Hartog DN, De Hoogh AH. Empowering behaviour and leader fairness and integrity: Studying perceptions of ethical leader behaviour from a levels-of-analysis perspective. European journal of work and organizational psychology. 2009 Jun 1;18(2):199–230.
  7. Simon HA. Foreword papers in honor of chester I. Barnard. International Journal of Public Administration. 1994 Jan 1;17(6):1021–31.
  8. Eisenhardt KM, Zbaracki MJ. Strategic decision making. Strategic management journal. 1992 Dec;13(S2):17–37.
  9. Robbins SP, Judge T. Organizational behavior. Pearson South Africa; 2009.
  10. Raza SA, Sikandar A. Impact of leadership style of teacher on the performance of students: An application of Hersey and Blanchard situational model. Bulletin of Education and Research. 2018 Dec;40(3):73–94.
  11. Borgmann L, Rowold J, Bormann KC. Integrating leadership research: A meta-analytical test of Yukl’s meta-categories of leadership. Personnel Review. 2016 Sep 5;45(6):1340–66.
  12. Judge TA, Piccolo RF. Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of applied psychology. 2004 Oct;89(5):755.
  13. Johnson-Laird PN, Shafir E. The interaction between reasoning and decision making: An introduction. Cognition. 1993 Oct 1;49(1-2):1–9.
  14. Lewin K, Lippitt R, White RK. Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates”. The Journal of social psychology. 1939 May 1;10(2):269–99.
  15. Stogdill RM, Shartle CL. Methods for determining patterns of leadership behavior in relation to organization structure and objectives. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1948 Jun;32(3):286–291.
  16. Ghiselli EE. Some perspectives for industrial psychology. American Psychologist. 1974 Feb;29(2):80–87.
  17. Mintzberg H, Raisinghani D, Theoret A. The structure of” unstructured” decision processes. Administrative science quarterly. 1976 Jun 21(2):246–75.
  18. Kent TW. Leading and managing: it takes two to tango. Management Decision. 2005 Aug 1;43(7-8):1010–7.
  19. Nutt PC. Investigating the success of decision making processes. Journal of management studies. 2008 Mar;45(2):425–55.
  20. Boyatzis RE, Goleman D, Rhee K. Clustering competence in emotional intelligence: Insights from the Emotional Competence Inventory (ECI). Handbook of emotional intelligence. 2000;99(6):343–62.
  21. Hickson DJ, Butler RJ, Cray D, Mallory GR, Wilson DC. Decision and organization–processes of strategic decision making and their explanation. Public Administration. 1989 Dec;67(4):373–90.
  22. Skogstad A, Einarsen S, Torsheim T, Aasland MS, Hetland H. The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior. Journal of occupational health psychology. 2007 Jan;12(1):80.
  23. Somech A. The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of management. 2006 Feb;32(1):132–57.
  24. Drucker PF. Management: The Problems of Success: (Keynote Address at 50th Anniversary Meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, Illinois, August 14, 1986). Academy of Management Perspectives. 1987 Feb 1;1(1):13–9.
  25. Yammarino FJ. Leadership Vistas: An Alternative Interpretation of the” Data”. Journal of Leadership Studies. 1996 Apr;3(2):70–4.
  26. Argyris C. Organizational leadership and participative management. The Journal of Business. 1955 Jan 1;28(1):1–7.
  27. Vroom VH, Jago AG. The role of the situation in leadership. American psychologist. 2007 Jan;62(1):17.
  28. Wang G, Oh IS, Courtright SH, Colbert AE. Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & organization management. 2011 Apr;36(2):223–70.
  29. Gini A, Green RM. Three critical characteristics of leadership: Character, stewardship, experience. Business and society review. 2014 Dec;119(4):435–46.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 03
Issue 02
Received 22/06/2026
Accepted 08/09/2026
Published 09/09/2026
Publication Time 79 Days

Login

My IP

PlumX Metrics

Support