Architectural Evolution of RISC Processors: From Early Research Prototypes to Modern Industrial Implementations

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2026 | Volume : 16 | 02 | Page :
By

Aditya Chauhan,

Mitesh Limachia,

Narendra Chauhan,

Purvang Dalal,

  1. Student, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
  2. Associate Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
  3. Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
  4. Professor and Head of Department, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India

Abstract

This paper surveys the architectural evolution of Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC) architectures from early research prototypes to modern industrial processors, tracing four decades of design refinement across academic, embedded, server, mobile, and open- hardware ecosystems. Core ISA principles, pipeline evolution, compiler–hardware co-design, and quantitative performance modeling are analyzed through four representative industrial implementations: MIPS 74K, SPARC T4, ARM Cortex-A72, and SiFive U74 (RISC-V). Each processor is examined in terms of its unique microarchitectural features, target application domain, and position within the broader instruction-count, cycle-per-instruction, and clock-period performance framework. While execution engines have evolved substantially from simple in-order pipelines toward superscalar, out-of-order, and multithreaded designs fundamental RISC characteristics such as load/store execution discipline, ISA regularity, and register-centric computation remain persistent across generations. The survey further examines emerging challenges facing high-performance RISC implementations, including speculative-execution security vulnerabilities such as Spectre and Meltdown, the growing importance of energy-proportional computing under Dark Silicon constraints, and the rise of Domain-Specific Architectures (DSAs) enabled by the open and extensible RISC-V ecosystem. Comparative tables consolidate ISA-level and microarchitectural distinctions across six representative designs, offering a structured reference for researchers and practitioners. By bridging classical RISC tenets with modern execution, security, and efficiency constraints, this work provides a comprehensive technical synthesis of how different RISC families optimized their architectures for distinct computing domains while preserving the core principles that originally defined the RISC paradigm.

Keywords: RISC, MIPS, SPARC, ARM, RISC-V, Pipeline Architecture, CPI, Load/Store Architecture.

How to cite this article: Aditya Chauhan, Mitesh Limachia, Narendra Chauhan, Purvang Dalal. Architectural Evolution of RISC Processors: From Early Research Prototypes to Modern Industrial Implementations. Journal of VLSI Design Tools and Technology. 2026; 16(02):-.
How to cite this URL: Aditya Chauhan, Mitesh Limachia, Narendra Chauhan, Purvang Dalal. Architectural Evolution of RISC Processors: From Early Research Prototypes to Modern Industrial Implementations. Journal of VLSI Design Tools and Technology. 2026; 16(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jovdtt/article=2026/view=253020

References

  1. Patterson DA, Ditzel DR. The case for the reduced instruction set computer. InReadings in computer architecture 2000 Jan 1 (pp. 135-143).
  2. Ganek AG, Corbi TA. The dawning of the autonomic computing era. IBM systems Journal. 2003 Dec 31;42(1):5-18.
  3. Tamir Y, Tremblay M. High-performance fault-tolerant VLSI systems using micro rollback. IEEE transactions on Computers. 1990 Apr 30;39(4):548-54.
  4. Hennessy. VLSI processor architecture. IEEE Transactions on Computers. 1984 Dec 31;100(12):1221-46.
  5. Hennessy J, Jouppi N, Baskett F, Gross T, Gill J. Hardware/software tradeoffs for increased performance. ACM SIGPLAN Notices. 1982 Mar 1;17(4):2-11.
  6. Garner RB. The scalable processor architecture (SPARC). InThe SPARC Technical Papers 1991 (pp. 3-31). New York, NY: Springer New York.
  7. Patterson D. Reduced instruction set computers then and now. Computer. 2017 Dec 18;50(12):10-2.
  8. Waterman A, Lee Y, Patterson D, Asanovic K, level Isa VI, Waterman A, Lee Y, Patterson D. The RISC- V instruction set manual. Volume I: User-Level ISA’, version. 2014 May 6;2:1-79.
  9. Novkovic T, Lukac Z, Jovanovic P, Kastelan I. Graphic Library Optimization for MIPS Architecture. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika. 2020 Apr 25;26(2):69-76.
  10. Shin JL, Golla R, Li H, Dash S, Choi Y, Smith A, Sathianathan H, Joshi M, Park H, Elgebaly M, Turullols S. The next generation 64b SPARC core in a T4 SoC processor. IEEE journal of solid-state circuits. 2012 Dec 31;48(1):82-90.

Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume 16
02
Received 31/07/2026
Accepted 12/08/2026
Published 20/08/2026
Publication Time 20 Days


Login

My IP

PlumX Metrics