Predictive Analytics for Student Well-Being and Occupational Success

Year : 2026 | Volume : 03 | 01 | Page :
    By

    SHUBHANK CHATURVEDI,

  1. Research scholar, Department of Education, Maharaja Agrasen Himalayan Garhwal University, Pauri Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India

Abstract

The integration of predictive analytics into higher education has significantly transformed institutional decision-making processes. However, prevailing implementations remain predominantly performance-centered, focusing on dropout prediction and grade forecasting rather than holistic developmental outcomes. Concurrently, higher education systems worldwide are confronting escalating concerns regarding student mental health, disengagement, career uncertainty, and labor market volatility. These intersecting challenges necessitate a broader theoretical reconceptualization of predictive analytics—one that integrates psychological well-being and long-term occupational success as central educational outcomes. This paper advances a comprehensive developmental systems framework positioning predictive
analytics as an ethically governed, adaptive guidance architecture. Drawing upon learning analytics, educational data mining, positive psychology, self-determination theory, human capital theory, social cognitive career theory, and career construction theory, the proposed model conceptualizes
educational trajectories as dynamic, multidimensional systems influenced by cognitive, socio-emotional, behavioral, and contextual variables. The framework comprises five interdependent components: multidimensional data integration, predictive modeling architecture, adaptive intervention systems, developmental feedback loops, and occupational alignment pathways. Ethical governance is embedded as a structural layer throughout. Four theoretical propositions are articulated to guide empirical testing. The paper contributes to the literature by reframing predictive analytics from a surveillance-based risk detection mechanism into
a developmental empowerment system capable of enhancing both well-being and long-term employability. Institutional design implications, governance considerations, and a future research agenda are discussed.

Keywords: Predictive analytics, student well-being, occupational success, learning analytics, AI in education, career adaptability, developmental systems, ethical AI

How to cite this article:
SHUBHANK CHATURVEDI. Predictive Analytics for Student Well-Being and Occupational Success. International Journal of Education Sciences. 2026; 03(01):-.
How to cite this URL:
SHUBHANK CHATURVEDI. Predictive Analytics for Student Well-Being and Occupational Success. International Journal of Education Sciences. 2026; 03(01):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijes/article=2026/view=246861


References

  1. Baker RS, Martin T, Rossi LM. Educational data mining and learning analytics. The Wiley handbook of cognition and assessment: Frameworks, methodologies, and applications. 2016 Nov 16:379-396
  2. Becker GS. Human capital revisited. InHuman capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education, third edition 1994 Jan 1 (pp. 15-28). The University of Chicago Press.
  3. Ferguson R. Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International journal of technology enhanced learning. 2012 Jan 1;4(5-6):304-17.
  4. Lent RW, Brown SD, Hackett G. Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of vocational behavior. 1994 Aug 1;45(1):79-122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
  5.  Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  6. Brown SD, Lent RW, editors. Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work. John Wiley & Sons; 2012 Jun 29.
  7. Savickas ML, Nota L, Rossier J, Dauwalder JP, Duarte ME, Guichard J, Soresi S, Van Esbroeck R, Van Vianen AE. Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century. Journal of vocational behavior. 2009 Dec 1;75(3):239-50.
  8.  Long P, Siemens G. Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education. Italian Journal of Educational Technology. 2014 Dec 31;22(3):132-137.
  9. Williamson B, Eynon R. Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology. 2020 Jul 2;45(3):223-35.
  10. D’Mello S, Graesser A. Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learning and Instruction. 2012 Apr 1;22(2):145-57  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.001

Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume 03
01
Received 31/03/2026
Accepted 28/05/2026
Published 29/05/2026
Publication Time 59 Days


Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics