Utkarsh Kant Mishra,
Anand Prakash Yadav,
Satyam Kumar,
- Student, Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Artificial Intelligence), Galgotias College of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
- Student, Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Artificial Intelligence), Galgotias College of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
- Student, Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Artificial Intelligence), Galgotias College of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
Abstract
Segmentation of brain tumors in MRI scans is an integral part of neuroimaging carried out for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Given that manual segmentation is cumbersome and highly variable, there arises a need for automated, more precise segmentation solutions. This project, ‘Machine Learning and Deep Neural Networks to Advance Brain Tumor MRI Segmentation’ will develop a better, efficient, and accurate segmentation model to help clinicians identify brain tumors with greater accuracy. The most commonly used imaging technique applied in the evaluation of brain tumors is magnetic resonance imaging, which allows radiologists to view the interior of the brain using radio waves and magnets. However, it is time-consuming and complex to differentiate between tumorous and nontumorous regions due to the complexity of the region involved with the tumor. Therefore, automatic reliable segmentation and predictability are required in brain tumor segmentation. This gives us a trustworthy and efficient variant of neural network-based segmentation, which we propose to incorporate attention into convolutional neural networks for brain tumor segmentation. The encoder component of UNET’s pre-trained VGG19 network induces noise in segmentation through adjacent decoder components with attention gates while employing a denoising mechanism to counter overfitting. Our address here in Segmentation is with the dataset from BRATS’20 containing four different MRI modalities along with one target mask file. For the tumors identified in enhancing core and whole parts, respectively, the algorithm described above yielded a dice similarity coefficient equal to 0.83, 0.86, and 0.90.
Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), convolutional neural network (CNN), attention mechanism, deep learning, embedded medical systems, electronic health diagnostics
[This article belongs to Recent Trends in Electronics Communication Systems ]
Utkarsh Kant Mishra, Anand Prakash Yadav, Satyam Kumar. Advancing Brain Tumor MRI Segmentation. Recent Trends in Electronics Communication Systems. 2025; 12(02):28-33.
Utkarsh Kant Mishra, Anand Prakash Yadav, Satyam Kumar. Advancing Brain Tumor MRI Segmentation. Recent Trends in Electronics Communication Systems. 2025; 12(02):28-33. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rtecs/article=2025/view=0
References
1. Rizwan M, Shabbir A, Javed AR, Shabbir M, Baker T, Obe DA. Brain tumor and glioma grade classification using Gaussian convolutional neural network. IEEE Access. 2022 Feb 21; 10:29731–40.
2. Abiwinanda N, Hanif M, Hesaputra ST, Handayani A, Mengko TR. Brain tumor classification using convolutional neural network. In World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2018: June 3-8, 2018, Prague, Czech Republic (Vol. 1). Singapore: Springer; 2019; 183–189.
3. Forst DA, Nahed BV, Loeffler JS, Batchelor TT. Low-grade gliomas. Oncologist. 2014 Apr 1; 19(4): 403–13.
4. Menze BH, Jakab A, Bauer S, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Farahani K, Kirby J, Burren Y, Porz N, Slotboom J, Wiest R, Lanczi L. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Dec 4; 34(10): 1993–2024.
5. Lather M, Singh P. Investigating brain tumor segmentation and detection techniques. Procedia Comput Sci. 2020 Jan 1; 167: 121–30.
6. Hussain S, Anwar SM, Majid M. Segmentation of glioma tumors in brain using deep convolutional neural network. Neurocomputing. 2018 Mar 22; 282: 248–61.
7. Ghaffari A. Congestion control mechanisms in wireless sensor networks: a survey. J Netw Comput Appl. 2015;52:101–15.
8. Ballester M. Mechanisms of the Darzens and related condensations. Chem Rev. 1955 Apr 1;55(2):283–300.
9. Colman E, Holme P, Sayama H, Gershenson C. Efficient sentinel surveillance strategies for preventing epidemics on networks. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 15(11):e1007517.
10. Young GS. Advanced MRI of adult brain tumors. Neurol Clin. 2007 Nov 1; 25(4): 947–73.

Recent Trends in Electronics Communication Systems
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 02 |
| Received | 08/05/2025 |
| Accepted | 09/05/2025 |
| Published | 09/06/2025 |
| Publication Time | 32 Days |
[last_name]
