Social Dynamics and Behavioral Influences on Puberty Onset in Dairy Heifers: A Comprehensive Study

Year : 2025 | Volume : 14 | Issue : 01 | Page : 6 13
    By

    Md. Emran Hossain,

  • Minara Begum Munni,

  • Shilpi Islam,

  1. Professor, Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram, , Bangladesh
  2. MS Student, Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram, , Bangladesh
  3. Professor, Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Salna, Gazipur, , Bangladesh

Abstract

Puberty onset in dairy heifers is a critical milestone for reproductive efficiency and overall herd productivity. This study investigates the multifaceted roles of social dynamics and behavioral interactions in determining the timing of puberty in dairy heifers. By examining both individual and group-level behaviors, the research explores how factors, such as social hierarchy, peer interaction, environmental stimuli, and stress response contribute to variations in puberty onset. The study integrates observational data and physiological assessments, including hormone profiling and stress biomarkers, to offer a comprehensive understanding of these influences. Additionally, the analysis extends to the potential impacts of early-life management practices, group housing, and weaning strategies on behavioral development and reproductive maturation. Findings highlight the complexity of social environments and their influence on neuroendocrine function, offering valuable insights for optimizing management practices aimed at improving reproductive outcomes in dairy heifers. This comprehensive approach underscores the significance of social and behavioral factors in advancing sustainable and efficient dairy production systems.

 

Keywords: Behavioral influences, dairy heifers, endocrine regulation, group dynamics, herd management, puberty onset, social behavior

[This article belongs to Research and Reviews : Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology ]

How to cite this article:
Md. Emran Hossain, Minara Begum Munni, Shilpi Islam. Social Dynamics and Behavioral Influences on Puberty Onset in Dairy Heifers: A Comprehensive Study. Research and Reviews : Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology. 2025; 14(01):6-13.
How to cite this URL:
Md. Emran Hossain, Minara Begum Munni, Shilpi Islam. Social Dynamics and Behavioral Influences on Puberty Onset in Dairy Heifers: A Comprehensive Study. Research and Reviews : Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology. 2025; 14(01):6-13. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjovst/article=2025/view=193204


References

  1. Kenny DA, Heslin J, Byrne CJ. Early onset of puberty in cattle: Implications for gamete quality and embryo survival. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2018;30(1):101–117. doi: 10.1071/RD17376.
  2. Kenny DA, Byrne CJ. The effect of nutrition on timing of pubertal onset and subsequent fertility in the bull. Animal. 2018;12(s1):s36–s44. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118000514.
  3. Fantuz F, Fatica A, Salimei E, Marcantoni F, Todini L. Nutrition, growth, and age at puberty in heifers. Animals (Basel). 2024;14(19):2801. doi: 10.3390/ani14192801.
  4. Fortes MR, Nguyen LT, Neto LR, Reverter A, Moore SS, Lehnert SA, et al. Polymorphisms and genes associated with puberty in heifers. Theriogenology. 2016;86(1):333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.046.
  5. Dobson H, Smith RF, Royal MD, Knight CH, Sheldon IM. The high‐producing dairy cow and its reproductive performance. Reprod Domest Anim. 2007;42 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):17–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.00906.x.
  6. Duittoz AH, Tillet Y, Le Bourhis D, Schibler L. The timing of puberty (oocyte quality and management). Anim Reprod. 2018;13(3):313–333. doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR874.
  7. Lombardi G, Zarrilli S, Colao A, Paesano L, Di Somma C, Rossi F, et al. Estrogens and health in males. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001;178(1–2):51–55. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(01)00420-8.
  8. Michael JD, Baruselli PS, Campanile G. Influence of nutrition, body condition, and metabolic status on reproduction in female beef cattle: A review. Theriogenology. 2019;125:277–284. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.11.010.
  9. Perry GA. Physiology and endocrinology symposium: Harnessing basic knowledge of factors controlling puberty to improve synchronization of estrus and fertility in heifers. J Anim Sci. 2012;90(4):1172–1182. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4572.
  10. Hurnik JF. Sexual behavior of female domestic mammals. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1987;3(2):423–461. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0720(15)31162-2.
  11. Fernandez-Novo A, Pérez-Garnelo SS, Villagrá A, Pérez-Villalobos N, Astiz S. The effect of stress on reproduction and reproductive technologies in beef cattle—A review. Animals (Basel). 2020;10(11):2096. doi: 10.3390/ani10112096.
  12. Cavallini D, Mammi LM, Buonaiuto G, Palmonari A, Valle E, Formigoni A. Immune‐metabolic‐inflammatory markers in Holstein cows exposed to a nutritional and environmental stressing challenge. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2021;105 Suppl 1:42–55. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13607.
  13. Beilharz RG, Zeeb K. Social dominance in dairy cattle. Appl Anim Ethol. 1982;8(1–2):79–97. doi: 10.1016/0304-3762(82)90134-1.
  14. Tibbetts EA, Pardo-Sanchez J, Weise C. The establishment and maintenance of dominance hierarchies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022;377(1845):20200450. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0450.
  15. Nogues E, Lecorps B, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MA. Individual variability in response to social stress in dairy heifers. Animals (Basel). 2020;10(8):1440. doi: 10.3390/ani10081440.
  16. Fiol C, Aguerre M, Carriquiry M, Ungerfeld R. Social dominance affects intake rate and behavioral time budget in pre-pubertal dairy heifers allocated in continuous competitive situations. Animal. 2019;13(6):1297–1303. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118002835.
  17. Miglior F, Fleming A, Malchiodi F, Brito LF, Martin P, Baes CF. A 100-Year Review: Identification and genetic selection of economically important traits in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100(12):10251–10271. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12968.
  18. Miller-Cushon EK. Current research considering social behavior to improve the welfare of commercially raised dairy calves. JDS Commun. 2024;5(3):264–269. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2023-0441.
  19. Von Borell E, Dobson H, Prunier A. Stress, behaviour and reproductive performance in female cattle and pigs. Horm Behav. 2007;52(1):130–138. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.03.014.
  20. Freeman S, Poore M, Pickworth C, Alley M. Influence of weaning strategy on behavior, humoral indicators of stress, growth, and carcass characteristics. Transl Anim Sci. 2021;5(1):txaa231. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa231.
  21. Lynch EM, McGee M, Doyle S, Earley B. Effect of post-weaning management practices on physiological and immunological responses of weaned beef calves. Ir J Agric Food Res. 2011:161–74. doi: 10.2307/41549249.
  22. Schubach KM, Cooke RF, Brandão AP, Lippolis KD, Silva LG, Marques RS, et al. Impacts of stocking density on development and puberty attainment of replacement beef heifers. Animal. 2017;11(12):2260–2267. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117001070.
  23. Costa JHC, Von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Invited review: Effects of group housing of dairy calves on behavior, cognition, performance, and health. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99(4):2453–2467. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10144.
  24. Boissy A, Le Neindre P. Social influences on the reactivity of heifers: Implications for learning abilities in operant conditioning. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1990;25(1–2):149–165. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(90)90077-Q.
  25. Jurkovich V, Hejel P, Kovács L. A review of the effects of stress on dairy cattle behaviour. Animals (Basel). 2024;14(14):2038.  doi: 10.3390/ani14142038.
  26. Kim HD, Kim YJ, Jang M, Bae SG, Yun SH, Lee MR, et al. Heat stress during summer attenuates expression of the hypothalamic kisspeptin, an upstream regulator of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis, in domestic sows. Animals (Basel). 2022;12(21):2967. doi: 10.3390/ani12212967.
  27. Bøe KE, Færevik G. Grouping and social preferences in calves, heifers and cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2003;80(3):175–190. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00217-4.
  28. De la Cruz-Cruz LA, Bonilla-Jaime H, Orozco-Gregorio H, Tarazona-Morales AM, Ballesteros-Rodea G, Roldan-Santiago P, et al. Effects of weaning on the stress responses and productivity of water buffalo in different breeding systems: A review. Livestock Science. 2019;226:73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2019.05.020.
  29. Hemsworth PH, Hansen C, Barnett JL. The effects of human presence at the time of calving of primiparous cows on their subsequent behavioural response to milking. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1987;18(3-4):247–255. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(87)90220-6.
  30. Bertenshaw C, Rowlinson P, Edge H, Douglas S, Shiel R. The effect of different degrees of ‘positive’ human–animal interaction during rearing on the welfare and subsequent production of commercial dairy heifers. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2008;114(1–2):65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.12.002.
  31. Lee VE, Arnott G, Turner SP. Social behavior in farm animals: Applying fundamental theory to improve animal welfare. Front Vet Sci. 2022;9:932217. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.932217.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 14
Issue 01
Received 27/12/2024
Accepted 07/01/2025
Published 09/01/2025
Publication Time 13 Days
368

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics