This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.
V. Basil Hans,
- , Srinivas University, Pandeshwar, Mangalore 575001, Karnataka, India
Abstract
Biotechnology is changing how people interact with health, life, and the environment very quickly. This article talks about how new tools in genetic engineering, synthetic biology, and bioinformatics are making it possible for scientists to build and change biological things with more accuracy than ever before. Biotechnology is changing several fields, from making personalised medical treatments and disease-resistant crops to making biofuels and materials that break down naturally. The talk focuses on important new technologies including CRISPR-based gene editing, lab- grown tissues, and microbial engineering. It also talks about the moral, environmental, and legal problems that come with these technologies. As society evolves toward a future with bioengineering, it is important to find a balance between innovation and accountability. In the end, this essay stresses that biotechnology is not only a scientific field, but also a potent tool that will shape the future of human health, food security, and sustainability in the 21st century.
Keywords: Biotechnology, Genetic Engineering, Biology that is made by humans, CRISPR, Bioinformatics, Medicine that is tailored to you, Long-term viability
V. Basil Hans. The Future is Bioengineered: Consequences, Directions, and Regulation. Research and Reviews : A Journal of Biotechnology. 2026; 16(01):-.
V. Basil Hans. The Future is Bioengineered: Consequences, Directions, and Regulation. Research and Reviews : A Journal of Biotechnology. 2026; 16(01):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjobt/article=2026/view=241340
References
[1] Wintle BC, Boehm CR, Rhodes C, Molloy JC, Millett P, Adam L, Breitling R, Carlson R, Casagrande R, Dando M, Doubleday R. A transatlantic perspective on 20 emerging issues in biological engineering. Elife. 2017 Nov 14;6:e30247.
[2] Shogar I. Philosophy of modern bioengineering.
[3] Wintle BC, Boehm CR, Rhodes C, Molloy JC, Millett P, Adam L, Breitling R, Carlson R, Casagrande R, Dando M, Doubleday R. A transatlantic perspective on 20 emerging issues in biological engineering. Elife. 2017 Nov 14;6:e30247.
[4]Selin C, Lambert L, Morain S, Nelson JP, Barlevy D, Farooque M, Manley H, Scott CT. Researching the future: scenarios to explore the future of human genome editing. BMC Medical Ethics. 2023 Sep 21;24(1):72.
[5] Fu X, Shen Y. Synthetic genomics: Repurposing biological systems for applications in engineering biology. ACS Synthetic Biology. 2024 May 17;13(5):1394-9.
[6] Pio-Lopez L. Human enhancement, biocyborg and self-experimentation: biopower in the age of synthetic biology and gene editing.
[7] Rabitz F. Regulatory gaps in the global governance of synthetic biology. Issue 2014/11. 2014.
[8] Tan RP. Developing Translational Tissue Engineering Solutions for Regenerative Medicine (Doctoral dissertation).
[9] Trump B, Cummings C, Klasa K, Galaitsi S, Linkov I. Governing biotechnology to provide safety and security and address ethical, legal, and social implications. Frontiers in genetics. 2023 Jan 11;13:1052371.
[10] Undheim TA. The whack-a-mole governance challenge for AI-enabled synthetic biology: literature review and emerging frameworks. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2024 Feb 28;12:1359768.
[11] Rychnovská D. Anticipatory governance in biobanking: security and risk management in digital health. Science and engineering ethics. 2021 Jun;27(3):30.
[12] Wintle BC, Boehm CR, Rhodes C, Molloy JC, Millett P, Adam L, Breitling R, Carlson R, Casagrande R, Dando M, Doubleday R. A transatlantic perspective on 20 emerging issues in biological engineering. Elife. 2017 Nov 14;6:e30247.
[13] Petherbridge L. Road map to revolution-patent-based open science. Me. L. Rev.. 2007;59:339.
[14] S. Hartley, F. Gillund, L. van Hove, and F. Wickson, “Essential Features of Responsible Governance of Agricultural Biotechnology,” 2016. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[15] Hartley S, Gillund F, van Hove L, Wickson F. Essential Features of Responsible Governance of Agricultural Biotechnology. PLoS Biol. 2016 May 4;14(5):e1002453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002453. PMID: 27144921; PMCID: PMC4856357.
[16] Rose DC, Chilvers J. Agriculture 4.0: Broadening responsible innovation in an era of smart farming. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2018 Dec 21;2:387545.
[17]Bouchaut B, de Vriend H, Asveld L. Uncertainties and uncertain risks of emerging biotechnology applications: A social learning workshop for stakeholder communication. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2022 Sep 27;10:946526.
[18] Walker JT. When biology learning paradigms shift: What middle school students know, think, and learn about synthetic Biology (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania).
[19] Kemp L, Adam L, Boehm CR, Breitling R, Casagrande R, Dando M, Djikeng A, Evans NG, Hammond R, Hills K, Holt LA. Bioengineering horizon scan 2020. Elife. 2020 May 29;9:e54489.
[20] Cornelissen M, Małyska A, Nanda AK, Lankhorst RK, Parry MA, Saltenis VR, Pribil M, Nacry P, Inzé D, Baekelandt A. Biotechnology for tomorrow’s world: Scenarios to guide directions for future innovation. Trends in biotechnology. 2021 May 1;39(5):438-44.

Research and Reviews : A Journal of Biotechnology
| Volume | 16 |
| 01 | |
| Received | 02/04/2026 |
| Accepted | 03/04/2026 |
| Published | 29/04/2026 |
| Publication Time | 27 Days |
Login
PlumX Metrics