Role of Generative AI for Advanced Shell Language Design


Year : 2025 | Volume : 12 | Issue : 01 | Page : 22-28
    By

    Atti Manga Devi,

  • Manas Kumar Yogi,

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Information and Technology, Pragati Engineering College (A), Surampalem, Andhra Pradesh, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pragati Engineering College (A), Surampalem, Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract

document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_179287’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

This paper explores the emerging field of applying Artificial Intelligence (AI), specifically generative AI, to enhance shell scripting, a crucial skill for system administration and automation. While the formal design of entirely new shell languages using AI remains a long-term prospect, the current focus is on augmenting how existing shell languages are used improving the scripting experience. This involves leveraging AI for tasks like automated script generation, intelligent code completion and suggestion, security analysis of shell scripts, and performance optimization. We examine the key players in this space, from large tech companies integrating AI into their internal tooling to startups developing specialized AI-powered shell scripting tools. The paper highlights the various aspects of shell scripting that AI is poised to impact, including usability, productivity, security, and maintainability. Furthermore, it delves into the significant challenges associated with this endeavor, such as data scarcity and quality, the crucial need for contextual understanding within the shell environment, ensuring the security of AI-generated code, and the importance of explainability and trust in these AI systems. Despite these hurdles, the potential benefits of AI-driven shell scripting are substantial, promising to democratize access to this powerful tool, automate tedious tasks, and enhance the efficiency and security of system management. This paper concludes by emphasizing the transformative potential of AI in reshaping the future of shell scripting.

Keywords: Generative AI, Unix, Shell, Language, Design

[This article belongs to Journal of Advances in Shell Programming ]

How to cite this article:
Atti Manga Devi, Manas Kumar Yogi. Role of Generative AI for Advanced Shell Language Design. Journal of Advances in Shell Programming. 2025; 12(01):22-28.
How to cite this URL:
Atti Manga Devi, Manas Kumar Yogi. Role of Generative AI for Advanced Shell Language Design. Journal of Advances in Shell Programming. 2025; 12(01):22-28. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joasp/article=2025/view=0


document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_179287’);});Edit

References

  1. Ma M, Han L, Zhou C. Research and application of artificial intelligence based webshell detection model: A literature review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.00066. 2024 Apr 28.
  2. Song J, Kim J, Choi S, Kim J, Kim I. Evaluations of AI‐based malicious PowerShell detection with feature optimizations. ETRI Journal. 2021 Jun;43(3):549–60.
  3. Choi S. Malicious powershell detection using attention against adversarial attacks. Electronics. 2020 Nov 2;9(11):1817.
  4. Kidwai A, Arya C, Singh P, Diwakar M, Singh S, Sharma K, Kumar N. A comparative study on shells in Linux: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021 Jan 1;37:2612–6.
  5. Mirra G, Pugnale A. Exploring a design space of shell and tensile structures generated by AI from historical precedents. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures. 2022 Sep 1;63(3):172–88.
  6. Wang H, Du Q, Wang Y, Xu H, Wei Z, Wang X. GPro: generative AI-empowered toolkit for promoter design. Bioinformatics. 2024 Mar 1;40(3):btae123.
  7. Liu Y, Gao P, Wang X, Liu J, Shi Y, Zhang Z, Peng C. Marscode agent: Ai-native automated bug fixing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.00899. 2024 Sep 2.
  8. Shen Y, Shao J, Zhang X, Lin Z, Pan H, Li D, Zhang J, Letaief KB. Large language models empowered autonomous edge AI for connected intelligence. IEEE Communications Magazine. 2024 Jan 8;62(10):140–6.
  9. Pa Pa YM, Tanizaki S, Kou T, Van Eeten M, Yoshioka K, Matsumoto T. An attacker’s dream? exploring the capabilities of chatgpt for developing malware. InProceedings of the 16th cyber security experimentation and test workshop 2023 Aug 7 (pp. 10–18).
  10. Buscemi A. A comparative study of code generation using chatgpt 3.5 across 10 programming languages. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.04477. 2023 Aug 8.
  11. Moustafa N. A new distributed architecture for evaluating AI-based security systems at the edge: Network TON_IoT datasets. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021 Sep 1;72:102994.
  12. Rustagi V, Gupta SR, Singh A, Singh IK. Beyond trial and error: Leveraging advanced software for Therapeutic discovery. Chemical Biology Letters. 2025;12(1):1251–.
  13. Georgievski I. Towards engineering ai planning functionalities as services. InInternational Conference on Service-Oriented Computing 2022 Nov 29 (pp. 225–236). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  14. Ruan J, Chen Y, Zhang B, Xu Z, Bao T, Mao H, Li Z, Zeng X, Zhao R. Tptu: Task planning and tool usage of large language model-based ai agents. InNeurIPS 2023 Foundation Models for Decision Making Workshop 2023.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 12
Issue 01
Received 21/02/2025
Accepted 26/02/2025
Published 20/03/2025
Publication Time 27 Days
192

async function fetchCitationCount(doi) {
let apiUrl = `https://api.crossref.org/works/${doi}`;
try {
let response = await fetch(apiUrl);
let data = await response.json();
let citationCount = data.message[“is-referenced-by-count”];
document.getElementById(“citation-count”).innerText = `Citations: ${citationCount}`;
} catch (error) {
console.error(“Error fetching citation count:”, error);
document.getElementById(“citation-count”).innerText = “Citations: Data unavailable”;
}
}
fetchCitationCount(“10.37591/JOASP.v12i01.0”);

Loading citations…