[{“box”:0,”content”:”n[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n
n
Open Access
nn
n
n[/if 992]n[if 2704 equals=”Yes”]n
nThis is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.n
n[/if 2704]n
n
n
nn
n
V. Basil Hans,
n t
n
n[/foreach]
n
n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n
- [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t
- Research Professor, Department of Management & Commerce, Srinivas University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
n[/if 1175][/foreach]
n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n
Abstract
n
n
nFlow separation remains a significant challenge in aerodynamic applications, often leading to increased drag, loss of lift, and reduced efficiency in air and ground vehicles. This study investigates the use of active flow control (AFC) devices to mitigate flow separation and enhance aerodynamic performance. Active methods such as synthetic jets, plasma actuators, and pulsed blowing are examined for their ability to dynamically manipulate boundary layer behavior and delay or suppress separation. The study combines computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with experimental data to assess the effectiveness of these techniques under various flow conditions and geometries. Results indicate that properly tuned active devices can significantly improve lift-to-drag ratios, delay stall onset, and maintain flow attachment over critical surfaces. The findings underscore the potential of AFC technologies for integration into advanced aerodynamic designs, particularly in aerospace and automotive engineering.nn
n
Keywords: Active flow control (AFC), flow separation, boundary layer manipulation, synthetic jets, plasma actuators
n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Aerospace Engineering & Technology ]
n
n
n
n
nV. Basil Hans. [if 2584 equals=”][226 wpautop=0 striphtml=1][else]Aerodynamic Flow Separation Control Using Active Flow Devices[/if 2584]. Journal of Aerospace Engineering & Technology. 25/09/2025; 15(03):1-7.
n
nV. Basil Hans. [if 2584 equals=”][226 striphtml=1][else]Aerodynamic Flow Separation Control Using Active Flow Devices[/if 2584]. Journal of Aerospace Engineering & Technology. 25/09/2025; 15(03):1-7. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joaet/article=25/09/2025/view=0
nn
n
n[if 992 not_equal=”Open Access”]n
n
n[/if 992]n
nn
Browse Figures
n
n
n[/if 379]
n
n
n
References n
n[if 1104 equals=””]n
- Cattafesta III LN, Sheplak M. Actuators for active flow control. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2011 Jan 21; 43(1): 247–72.
- Corke TC, Enloe CL, Wilkinson SP. Dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators for flow control. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2010; 42(1): 505–29.
- Corke TC, Post ML, Orlov DM. Single dielectric barrier discharge plasma enhanced aerodynamics: physics, modeling and applications. Exp Fluids. 2009 Jan; 46(1): 1–26.
- Pollard A, Bonnet JP, Gad-el-Hak M. Flow control: Current status and future prospects. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 1998 Jan 1; 16(1–2): 157–64.
- Glezer A, Amitay M. Synthetic jets. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2002 Jan; 34(1): 503–29.
- Greenblatt D, Wygnanski IJ. The control of flow separation by periodic excitation. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2000 Oct 1; 36(7): 487–545.
- Mitchell BE, Lele SK, Moin P. Direct computation of the sound from a compressible co-rotating vortex pair. J Fluid Mech. 1995 Feb; 285: 181–202.
- Zong H, Chiatto M, Kotsonis M, De Luca L. Plasma synthetic jet actuators for active flow control. Actuators (MDPI). 2018 Nov 1; 7(4): 77.
- Newsome RW, Berkooz G, Bhaskaran R. Use of analytical flow sensitivities in static aeroelasticity. AIAA J. 1998 Aug; 36(8): 1537–40.
- Spalart PR. Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations. Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments; Elsevier Science Ltd. 1999 Jan 1; 4: 3–17.
- Spalart PR. Philosophies and fallacies in turbulence modeling. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2015 Apr 1; 74: 1–15.
- Huang P, Bardina J, Coakley T. Turbulence modeling validation, testing, and development. NASA Technical Memorandum 110446. California: NASA; 1997 Apr; 10-2514.
nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n
- [foreach 1102]n t
- [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1104]
n
nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n
n[/if 1114]
n
n

n
n
n
nn
n
| Volume | 15 | |
| [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] | 03 | |
| Received | 06/08/2025 | |
| Accepted | 29/08/2025 | |
| Published | 25/09/2025 | |
| Retracted | ||
| Publication Time | 50 Days |
n
n
nn
n
Login
PlumX Metrics
n
n
n[if 1746 equals=”Retracted”]n
[/if 1746]nnn
nnn”}]