Breast Cancer Screening Awareness and Participation Among Women in North India

Year : 2025 | Volume : 03 | Issue : 02 | Page : 43 50
    By

    Eric Kwasi Elliason,

  • Atul Khajuria,

  • Stephen Monday,

  • J. Samuel Kamanda,

  1. Teaching Assistant, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Desh Bhagat University, Punjab, India
  2. Director, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Desh Bhagat University, Punjab, India
  3. Teaching Assistant, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Desh Bhagat University, Punjab, India
  4. Teaching Assistant, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Desh Bhagat University, Punjab, India

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy among Indian women, accounting for 25% of all female cancers (ICMR, 2020). Significant urban-rural disparities in screening persist across North India due to socioeconomic, cultural, and healthcare access barriers. This study evaluates these disparities to inform targeted interventions. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,500 women (750 urban, 750 rural) in Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, and Haryana, using stratified random sampling. Data were collected via structured questionnaires (urban) and in-person interviews (rural) to assess awareness of symptoms and screening, participation in mammography and self-exams, and perceived barriers. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, logistic regression (SPSS v22), and thematic analysis of qualitative responses. Urban women demonstrated significantly higher awareness of symptoms (65% vs. 50%, p<0.001) and mammography (72% vs. 50%, p<0.001). Screening participation was also higher among urban women for mammography (38% vs. 22%) and self-exams (55% vs. 40%, p<0.001). Financial constraints (40%) and lack of information (30%) were the predominant barriers in rural areas, while time limitations (27%) were most cited by urban women. Education (OR=3.5, 95% CI=2.1–5.5) and income (OR=2.8, 95% CI=1.8–4.3) were strong predictors of screening uptake. Findings highlight the urgent need for targeted interventions. Policy recommendations include subsidized rural screening, community-based awareness campaigns, and integration of breast self-exam education into primary care. Addressing socioeconomic and cultural determinants could reduce screening disparities by an estimated 40–50% over 5 years.

Keywords: Breast cancer, screening disparities, urban-rural, awareness, India

[This article belongs to International Journal of Women’s Health Nursing And Practices ]

How to cite this article:
Eric Kwasi Elliason, Atul Khajuria, Stephen Monday, J. Samuel Kamanda. Breast Cancer Screening Awareness and Participation Among Women in North India. International Journal of Women’s Health Nursing And Practices. 2025; 03(02):43-50.
How to cite this URL:
Eric Kwasi Elliason, Atul Khajuria, Stephen Monday, J. Samuel Kamanda. Breast Cancer Screening Awareness and Participation Among Women in North India. International Journal of Women’s Health Nursing And Practices. 2025; 03(02):43-50. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijwhnp/article=2025/view=235340


References

  1. Mathur P, Sathishkumar K, Chaturvedi M, Das P, Sudarshan KL, Santhappan S, Nallasamy V, John A, Narasimhan S, Roselind FS. ICMR-NCDIR-NCRP Investigator Group. Cancer Statistics, 2020: Report From National Cancer Registry Programme, India. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Jul; 6: 1063–1075. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00122. PMID: 32673076; PMCID: PMC7392737.
  2. Singh S, Pal N, Shubham S, Sarma DK, Verma V, Marotta F, Kumar M. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Etiology, Current Management, and Future Therapeutics. J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 11; 12(4): doi: 10.3390/jcm12041454. PMID: 36835989; PMCID: PMC9964744.
  3. Harvie M, Howell A, Evans DG. Can diet and lifestyle prevent breast cancer: what is the evidence? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015; e66–73. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.e66. PMID: 25993238.
  4. D’almeida D, Latha T. Barriers for Early Detection of Breast Cancer among South Indian Women. Indian J Community Med. 2021 Oct–Dec; 46(4): 706–709. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_751_20. Epub 2021 Dec 8. PMID: 35068739; PMCID: PMC8729280.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  6. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013; 310(20): 2191–2194. Available at: https://jamanetwork.
    com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1760318
  7. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17; 151(10): 727–37, W237– doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009. PMID: 19920273; PMCID: PMC2972726.
  8. Teede HJ, Misso ML, Deeks AA, Moran LJ, Stuckey BG, Wong JL, Norman RJ, Costello MF. Guideline Development Groups. Assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: summary of an evidence-based guideline. Med J Aust. 2011 Sep 19;195(6): S65–112. doi: 10.5694/mja11.10915. Erratum in: Med J Aust. 2011 Nov 21; 195(10): PMID: 21929505.
  1. Bharali MD, Rajendran R, Goswami J, Singal K, Rajendran V. Prevalence of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2022 Dec 9; 14(12): doi: 10.7759/cureus.32351. PMID: 36628015; PMCID: PMC9826643.
  2. Bozdag G, Mumusoglu S, Zengin D, Karabulut E, Yildiz BO. The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2016 Dec; 31(12): 2841–2855. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew218. Epub 2016 Sep 22. PMID: 27664216.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 03
Issue 02
Received 05/08/2025
Accepted 05/10/2025
Published 20/10/2025
Publication Time 76 Days
40

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics