Optimization of Robotic Path Planning Algorithms for Autonomous Material Handling Systems


Year : 2024 | Volume : 02 | Issue : 02 | Page : 15-20
    By

    Amit Shishodia,

  1. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Noida International University, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

For autonomous systems for handling materials (AMHS) to operate as efficiently as possible in industrial and logistical settings, robotic route planning is essential. This study examines many robotic route planning algorithms, emphasizing their use, ways of optimization, and difficulties in material handling systems. To improve the effectiveness, precision, and computational viability of these algorithms, the study also examines a number of optimization strategies, including machine learning, parallelization, heuristic search, and real-time adaptation approaches. The difficulties in designing path planning algorithms are specifically discussed, especially in dynamic and uncertain situations where the task needs and barriers are constantly shifting. We offer insights into how multiple approaches, including the A* algorithm, rapidly exploring random tree (RRT), Dijkstra’s algorithm, and machine learning-based techniques, may be modified for accuracy, efficiency, and real-time adaptability. To optimize path planning for dynamic situations, the study also examines the trade-offs that must be made between cutting computing complexity, improving real-time decision-making, and consuming the least amount of energy. Future directions in path planning optimization are discussed in the conclusion of the research, including the use of swarm robots, artificial intelligence (AI), and multi-agent systems in unmanned material handling systems. The trade-offs between computing complexity and path optimality are also examined, as is the effect of path planning on system performance, safety, and energy efficiency. To better enhance material handling systems autonomously, the study finishes by outlining new developments in the field, such as the integration of AI, multi-agent coordination, and swarm robotics. Finally, this work supports the shift to fully computerized and intelligent material handling operations by offering a thorough knowledge of how path planning algorithms may be improved to increase AMHS’s efficacy and adaptability in a variety of industrial contexts.

Keywords: Robotic path planning, autonomous material handling, optimization, algorithms, industrial automation, artificial intelligence, machine learning, navigation, logistics

[This article belongs to International Journal of Robotics and Automation in Mechanics ]

How to cite this article:
Amit Shishodia. Optimization of Robotic Path Planning Algorithms for Autonomous Material Handling Systems. International Journal of Robotics and Automation in Mechanics. 2024; 02(02):15-20.
How to cite this URL:
Amit Shishodia. Optimization of Robotic Path Planning Algorithms for Autonomous Material Handling Systems. International Journal of Robotics and Automation in Mechanics. 2024; 02(02):15-20. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijram/article=2024/view=194324


References

  1. LaValle S. Rapidly-exploring random trees: A new tool for path planning. Research Report 9811. 1998. Available from: https://msl.cs.illinois.edu/~lavalle/papers/Lav98c.pdf.
  2. Hart PE, Nilsson NJ, Raphael B. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Trans Syst Sci Cybern. 1968;4(2):100–7. doi: 10.1109/TSSC.1968.300136.
  3. Dijkstra EW. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer Math. 1959;1:269–71. doi: 10.1007/BF01386390.
  4. Raja P, Pugazhenthi S. Optimal path planning of mobile robots: A review. Int J Phys Sci. 2012 Feb 23;7(9):1314–20. DOI: 10.5897/IJPS11.1745.
  5. Khatib O. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. Int J Robot Res. 1986;5(1):90–8. doi: 10.1177/027836498600500106.
  6. Borenstein J, Koren Y. The vector field histogram—fast obstacle avoidance for mobile robots. IEEE Trans Robot Autom. 1991;7(3):278–88. doi: 10.1109/70.88137.
  7. Shamgah L, Tadewos TG, Karimoddini A, Homaifar A. Path planning and control of autonomous vehicles in dynamic reach-avoid scenarios. 2018 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), Copenhagen, Denmark. 2018. pp. 88–93. DOI: 10.1109/CCTA.2018.
  8. Silver D, Veness J. Monte-Carlo planning in large POMDPs. In: Lafferty J, Williams C, Shawe-Taylor J, Zemel R, Culotta A, editors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 23 (NIPS 2010). Red Hook (NY): Curran Associates; 2010. Available from: https://papers.nips.cc/
    paper_files/paper/2010/file/edfbe1afcf9246bb0d40eb4d8027d90f-Paper.pdf.
  9. Brock O, Khatib O. Elastic bands: Connecting path planning and control. [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, GA, USA. 1993, vol. 2. pp. 802–7. DOI: 10.1109/ROBOT.1993.291936.
  10. Toth P, Vigo D, editors. Vehicle Routing: Problems, Methods, and Applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: SIAM; 2014.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 02
Issue 02
Received 25/11/2024
Accepted 29/11/2024
Published 06/12/2024
Total Visits: 48


Loading citations…