Outcome Based Education and its Modifications to Suit Eastern Countries

Year : 2024 | Volume :01 | Issue : 01 | Page : –
By

D. Ananth Padmanabhan

T.R. Vijayaram

N. Ramya

  1. Associate Professor SSN College of Engineering, Tamil Nadu, India
  2. Professor Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research (BIHER), Tamil Nadu, India
  3. Professor Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research (BIHER), Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

A higher education strategy known as “outcome-based education” (OBE) is centered on assessing the effects and consequences of learning. It has been widely adopted and followed in several countries particularly in vocational and professional education. In this research, the state of outcome-based education—which combines traditional and content-based learning methods—in educational institutions is examined. Assuring that students obtain a top-notch education that equips them for success in their future occupations is made possible in large part by examining the status of OBE in educational institutions. A systematic structure for education, a particular approach to instructional practice, and an educational theory are the three main ways that OBE differs from standard education methods. It arranges the whole educational system around the things that are thought to be necessary for students to be able to do well when they finish their studies. OBE is proven to improve the quality of teaching and learning, competitiveness among graduates and English language proficiency of the students. The purpose of this schooling was to give the younger students access to the knowledge and abilities of an older generation while also creating a conducive learning atmosphere. The curriculum is decided upon by outcome-based education based on the competencies that students should exhibit at the conclusion of their program. As a result, the course offered, the educational environment, the teaching strategies, the content and organization of the curriculum, and the assessment techniques are all determined by the outcomes or competencies. Traditional teaching methods were output based and it is changing to outcome-based education. Education with an outcome focus is here to stay. Student-centric learning has replaced teacher-centric learning. This review paper examines outcome-based education in detail and compares the changes taking place in society in line with outcome based education.

Keywords: Outcome Based Education, Design-Down Approach, Learner Experience, Attainment, Course Outcomes, Outcome Based Education, Program Outcomes, Program Evaluation, Student Evaluation.

[This article belongs to International Journal of Education Sciences(ijes)]

How to cite this article: D. Ananth Padmanabhan, T.R. Vijayaram, N. Ramya. Outcome Based Education and its Modifications to Suit Eastern Countries. International Journal of Education Sciences. 2024; 01(01):-.
How to cite this URL: D. Ananth Padmanabhan, T.R. Vijayaram, N. Ramya. Outcome Based Education and its Modifications to Suit Eastern Countries. International Journal of Education Sciences. 2024; 01(01):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijes/article=2024/view=152421


References

  1. Kumbhar VS. Impact of Outcome-Based Education in Indian Universities. Solid State Technology. 2020 Dec 4;63(6):16938-43.
  2. Syeed MM, Shihavuddin AS, Uddin MF, Hasan M, Khan RH. Outcome based education (OBE): Defining the process and practice for engineering education. IEEE Access. 2022 Nov 4;10:119170-92.
  3. Pradhan D. Effectiveness of outcome based education (OBE) toward empowering the students performance in an engineering course. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy. 2021 Feb;5(2):58-65.
  4. Hilario JS. Using outcomes-based education (OBE) in the teaching and learning of community and public health with related learning experience. Asian Journal of Educational Research. 2015;3(3):46-56.
  5. Al-Twaijry AA. Student academic performance in undergraduate managerial-accounting courses. Journal of Education for Business. 2010 Jul 13;85(6):311-22.
  6. Baker R, Bayer F, Gabbin A, Izard D, Jacobs F, Polejewski S. Summary of “outcomes assessment”: American Accounting Association Teaching and Curriculum Section outcomes assessment committee. Journal of Accounting Education. 1994 Mar 1;12(2):105-14.
  7. Capper CA. Educational administration in a pluralistic society: A multiparadigm approach. Educational administration in a pluralistic society. 1993:7-35.
  8. Daggett WR. School counselors and information literacy from the perspective of Willard Daggett. Professional School Counseling. 2003 Apr 1;6(4):238-42.
  9. Griffin P. Outcomes and profiles: Changes in teachers’ assessment practices. Curriculum perspectives. 1998;18(1).
  10. Hartel RW, Gardner D. Making the transition to a food science curriculum based on assessment of learning outcomes. Journal of Food Science Education. 2003 Apr;2(2):32-9.
  11. King JA, Evans KM. Can We Achieve Outcome-Based Education?. Educational leadership. 1991;49(2):73-5.
  12. Lansari A, Tubaishat A, Al-Rawi A. Using an outcome-based information technology curriculum and an e-learning platform to facilitate student learning. Informing Science: International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline. 2007 Jan 1;4(2):461-71.

Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 01
Issue 01
Received May 28, 2024
Accepted June 20, 2024
Published June 28, 2024