Drone Safety Protocols Developing and Implementing Safety Procedures

Year : 2025 | Volume : 01 | Issue : 01 | Page : 44 49
    By

    Nidhi Sahu,

  • Rohit Singh Lather,

  • Deepak Kumar Bhalla,

  1. PhD Scholar, Mechanical Engineering Department, Lingaya’s Vidyapeeth, Faridabad, Haryana, India
  2. HOD ITM, Multidisciplinary Engineering Department, The NorthCap University, Gurugram,, Haryana, India
  3. Director, Multidisciplinary Engineering Department, Lingaya’s Vidyapeeth, Faridabad, Haryana, India

Abstract

The increasing utilization of drones across various sectors, including agriculture, logistics, surveillance, and recreational activities, necessitates the establishment of robust safety protocols to mitigate risks associated with their operation. This study explores the development and implementation of comprehensive safety procedures for drone operations, focusing on both regulatory compliance and technological advancements. The study emphasizes how crucial it is to comprehend the legal frameworks set forth by aviation authorities, including the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). It underscores the need for operators to be well-versed in regulations pertaining to airspace classifications, no-fly zones, and pilot certification requirements. Technological solutions, such as geofencing, collision avoidance systems, and real-time data analytics, are examined for their potential to enhance operational safety. The study also delves into the significance of thorough pre-flight inspections, regular maintenance schedules, and the establishment of emergency response protocols to address potential failures or unforeseen events. Drone operator certification and training programs are highlighted as essential parts of safety protocols, guaranteeing that pilots have the abilities and know-how to operate drones safely. The research further addresses the challenges of integrating drones into existing airspace systems, proposing collaborative approaches between manned and unmanned aircraft operators to ensure harmonious coexistence. Through a combination of regulatory adherence, technological innovation, and comprehensive training, this study provides a framework for developing and implementing effective safety procedures that can significantly reduce the risks associated with drone operations, thereby fostering a safer and more efficient integration of drones into various industries.

Keywords: Drones, multicopters, regulation, justice, legitimacy

[This article belongs to International Journal on Drones ]

How to cite this article:
Nidhi Sahu, Rohit Singh Lather, Deepak Kumar Bhalla. Drone Safety Protocols Developing and Implementing Safety Procedures. International Journal on Drones. 2025; 01(01):44-49.
How to cite this URL:
Nidhi Sahu, Rohit Singh Lather, Deepak Kumar Bhalla. Drone Safety Protocols Developing and Implementing Safety Procedures. International Journal on Drones. 2025; 01(01):44-49. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijd/article=2025/view=214596


References

  1. Demir M, Apel R, Braga AA, Brunson RK, Ariel B. Body worn cameras, procedural justice, and police legitimacy: A controlled experimental evaluation of traffic stops. Justice Q. 2020;37(1):53–84.
  2. Dolata M, Feuerriegel S, Schwabe G. A sociotechnical view of algorithmic fairness. Inf Syst J. 2022;32(4):754–818.
  3. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK338596/
  4. Schreiber PW, Sax H, Wolfensberger A, Clack L, Kuster SP, Swissnoso. The preventable proportion of healthcare-associated infections 2005–2016: systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018;39(11):1277–95. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30234463
  5. Cronin RM, et al. Adapting medical guidelines to be patient-centered using a patient-driven process for individuals with sickle cell disease and their caregivers. BMC Hematol. 2018;18:12.
  6. Napierala H, et al. Management of financial conflicts of interests in clinical practice guidelines in Germany: results from the public database guideline watch. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19(1):65.
  7. Ioannidis JPA. Professional societies should abstain from authorship of guidelines and disease definition statements. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11(10):e004889.
  8. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). NGC and NQMC inclusion criteria. 2014. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/gam/summaries/inclusion-criteria/index.html#ast
  9. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Developing NICE guidelines: the manual. 2014. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/media/default/about/what-we-do/our-programmes/developing-nice-guidelines-the-manual.pdf
  10. Ahrendt J. Acceptance of drones—Does it matter who operates a drone? [master’s thesis]. University of Twente; 2020.
  11. Al-Dosari K, Fetais N. A new shift in implementing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the safety and security of smart cities: A systematic literature review. Safety. 2023;9(3):64. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23000746
  12. Al-Dosari K, Hunaiti Z, Balachandran W. Systematic review on civilian drones in safety and security applications. Safety. 2023. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23000746
  13. Aston EV, O’Neill M, Hail Y, Wooff A. Information sharing in community policing in Europe: Building public confidence. Eur J Criminol. 2021;20(4):1349–68.
  14. Bradford B, Yesberg JA, Jackson J, Dawson P. Live facial recognition: Trust and legitimacy as predictors of public support for police use of new technology. Br J Criminol. 2020;60(6):1502–22.
  15. Bromberg DE, Charbonneau É, Smith A. Public support for facial recognition via police body-worn cameras: Findings from a list experiment. Gov Inf Q. 2020;37(1):101415.
  16. Collins English Dictionary. CED Policing. 2023.
  17. Çetin E, Cano A, Deransy R, Tres S, Barrado C. Implementing mitigations for improving societal acceptance of urban air mobility. Drones. 2022;6(2):28. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23000746
  18. Davies A. Through an Australian Lens: Exploring the impact of body-worn cameras on Police–Community relations. Policing. 2022;17:paac065.
  19. Dekker R, van den Brink P, Meijer A. Social media adoption in the police: Barriers and strategies.
  20. Del-Real C, Díaz-Fernández AM. Lifeguards in the sky: Examining the public acceptance of beach-rescue drones. Technol Soc. 2021;64:101502.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 01
Issue 01
Received 24/07/2024
Accepted 01/05/2025
Published 05/05/2025
Publication Time 285 Days
7

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics