Approach to Examine the Effect of Atomic Number on Single – Electron System of Group III Elements

Year : 2024 | Volume :01 | Issue : 02 | Page : 01-09
By
vector

Ukpaka C.P.,

  1. Professor, Department of Chemical/Petrochemical Engineering, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

Abstract

This study investigates the ionization energy, kinetic energy, and mass relationships among Group III elements (Boron, Aluminum, Gallium, Indium, and Thallium) to provide a comprehensive understanding of their atomic and physical properties. A detailed analysis of ionization energy trends reveals that Boron exhibits the highest ionization energy, while Thallium has the lowest, consistent with periodic trends influenced by increasing atomic radius and electron shielding. Gallium deviates slightly from this trend due to the presence of d-electrons, which contribute to additional shielding and reduced nuclear attraction. Further analysis of the kinetic energy-velocity relationship demonstrates that higher effective nuclear charge (Zeff) leads to increased electron kinetic energy, supported by quantum mechanical principles. Additionally, comparisons of atomic radius reveal that as atomic number increases, the balance between nuclear charge and shielding effects leads to varying spatial distributions, with Boron having the most compact electron cloud among these elements. Despite significant differences in atomic mass, the kinetic energy across these elements remains approximately constant, owing to the dominance of electron mass over atomic mass in determining kinetic behavior. This observation holds even in heavier elements like Thallium, where relativistic effects are minimal in this model. The study’s findings align with existing literature on atomic behavior, providing new insights into the dynamics of Group III elements. It underscores the importance of electron configuration, shielding effects, and relativistic contributions in shaping their physical properties, reinforcing the accuracy of theoretical models in predicting atomic trends.

Keywords: Ionization energy trends, mass relationship, group III elements, electron shielding and effective nuclear charge, periodic properties and atomic behavior.

[This article belongs to International Journal of Crystalline Materials (ijcm)]

How to cite this article:
Ukpaka C.P.. Approach to Examine the Effect of Atomic Number on Single – Electron System of Group III Elements. International Journal of Crystalline Materials. 2024; 01(02):01-09.
How to cite this URL:
Ukpaka C.P.. Approach to Examine the Effect of Atomic Number on Single – Electron System of Group III Elements. International Journal of Crystalline Materials. 2024; 01(02):01-09. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijcm/article=2024/view=182725

References

  1. Atkins, P. W., & Friedman, R. S. (2011). Molecular quantum mechanics. Oxford University Press, USA. Pp. 210-219
  2. Atkins, P. W., De Paula, J., & Keeler, J. (2023). Atkins’ physical chemistry. Oxford university press.pp 343-396
  3. Blum, V., Gehrke, R., Hanke, F., Havu, P., Havu, V., Ren, X. and Scheffler, M. (2009). Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals. Computer Physics Communications, 180(11), 2175-2196.
  4. Cordero, B., Gómez, V., Platero-Prats, A. E., Revés, M., Echeverría, J., Cremades, E., & Alvarez, S. (2008). Covalent radii revisited. Dalton Transactions, (21), 2832-2838.
  5. Frisch, M. J. E. A. (2009). gaussian 09, Revision d. 01, Gaussian. Inc, Wallingford CT, 201.
  6. Mahan, B. H., & Myers, R. J. (1987). University Chemistry (4th ed.). Benjamin Cummings.pp. 225-250
  7. McQuarrie, D. A. (2008). Quantum chemistry. University Science Books.pp 19-23
  8. Moler, C. B. (2004). Numerical computing with MATLAB. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.pp. 328-335
  9. Pyykkö, P. (2012). Relativistic effects in chemistry: more common than you thought. Annual review of physical chemistry, 63(1), 45-64.
  10. Pyykko, P. and Desclaux, J. P. (1979). Relativity and the periodic system of elements. Accounts of Chemical Research, 12(8), 276-281.
  11. House, J. E., & House, K. A. (2015). Aluminum, Gallium, Indium, and Thallium. Descriptive Inorganic Chemistry (Third Edition), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804697-5.00010-5
  12. Poleshchuk, O., Latosińska, J., & Latosińska, M. (2016). Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance, Applications. Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry (Third Edition), 432-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.12673-3
  13. Cummings, S. P., Savchenko, J., & Ren, T. (2011). Functionalization of flat Si surfaces with inorganic compounds—Towards molecular CMOS hybrid devices. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 255(15-16), 1587-1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2010.12.030
  14. Schorr, N. B., Hui, J., & Rodríguez-López, J. (2019). Electrocatalysis on ultra-thin 2D electrodes: New concepts and prospects for tailoring reactivity. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, 13, 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2018.11.003
  15. Das, P., Ganguly, S., Rosenkranz, A., Wang, B., Yu, J., Srinivasan, S., & Rajabzadeh, A. R. (2023). MXene/0D nanocomposite architectures: Design, properties and emerging applications. Materials Today Nano, 24, 100428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtnano.2023.100428
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 01
Issue 02
Received 08/10/2024
Accepted 21/10/2024
Published 13/11/2024
Views: 49