Challenges in Diabetes Management Barriers and Support Systems in North India

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2025 | Volume : 02 | Issue : 02 | Page :
    By

    Eric Kwasi Elliason,

  • Atul Khajuria,

  • Stephen Monday,

  • J. Samuel Kamanda,

  • Gagandeep singh,

  1. Teaching Assistant, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Desh Bhagat University, Punjab, India
  2. Director, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Desh Bhagat University, Punjab, India
  3. Teaching Assistant, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Desh Bhagat University, Punjab, India
  4. Teaching Assistant, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Desh Bhagat University, Punjab, India
  5. Assistant Professor, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Desh Bhagat University, Punjab, India

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of Diabetes mellitus is ever growing in India and management of the disease is hindered by socio-economic, healthcare, and psychosocial barriers. Insofar as economic and social barriers pose challenges ranging from limited access to medical care, social stigma, specialist support leading to improper glycemic control, which is a strong predictor for diabetes complications, morbidity and mortality. Moreover, developing an understanding of systemic challenges and available supports is vital for improving diabetes care and controlling the disease.

Methods: A sample of 1500 purposely selected respondents having diabetes from urban and rural district in North India participated in a cross-sectional survey. Participants were asked to provide demographic information alongside the self-reported financial and healthcare barriers, psychosocial challenges, and other forms of support. The resulting data was analyzed through SPSS version 27 for statistical tests of independence, including chi-square tests and logistic regression.

Results: The most common reporting challenge was stress and psychosocial burden (15.7%). This was followed by lack of access to diabetes specialists (15.3%), lack of social support (14.7%), cost of medication (14.3%), and difficulty in maintaining healthy nutrition (13.9%). No relationship between place of residence (urban vs. rural) and types of diabetes management challenges was found (χ² = 3.097, p = 0.797). This suggests that barriers exist in both environments. Some level of gender differences in challenges were identified but were not significant (χ² = 5.453, p = 0.941). Participants reported moderate adherence to prescribed medication (Mean = 2.95, SD = 1.433) and minimal attendance with health care providers (Mean = 2.48, SD = 1.099).

Conclusion: The study points out the existences of challenges in diabetes management, where psychological issues and enforcement concerns take precedence. While evident, diabetes-related challenges cut across gender and residential areas, which calls for systemic solutions. Improving the healthcare system, lowering the cost of treatment, providing psychiatric assistance, and enhancing the provision of diabetes care at the community level could work towards better diabetes management.

Keywords: Diabetes care, access to healthcare, economic barriers, psychosocial barriers, Northern India, adherence to self-care, social support, rural and urban areas.

[This article belongs to Emerging Trends in Metabolites ]

How to cite this article:
Eric Kwasi Elliason, Atul Khajuria, Stephen Monday, J. Samuel Kamanda, Gagandeep singh. Challenges in Diabetes Management Barriers and Support Systems in North India. Emerging Trends in Metabolites. 2025; 02(02):-.
How to cite this URL:
Eric Kwasi Elliason, Atul Khajuria, Stephen Monday, J. Samuel Kamanda, Gagandeep singh. Challenges in Diabetes Management Barriers and Support Systems in North India. Emerging Trends in Metabolites. 2025; 02(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/etm/article=2025/view=216593


References

  1. Zhao H, Johnson JA, Al Sayah F, Soprovich A, Eurich DT. The association of self-efficacy and hospitalization rates in people with type-2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2018 Sep 1;143:113-9.
  2. Qin W, Blanchette JE, Yoon M. Self-efficacy and diabetes self-management in middle-aged and older adults in the United States: a systematic review. Diabetes Spectrum. 2020 Nov 1;33(4):315-23.
  3. Gupta R, Misra A, Vikram NK, Kondal D, Gupta SS, Agrawal A, Pandey RM. Younger age of escalation of cardiovascular risk factors in Asian Indian subjects. BMC cardiovascular disorders. 2009 Dec;9:1-2.
  4. Rajeev Gupta RG, Anoop Misra AM, Vikram NK, Dimple Kondal DK, Gupta SS, Aachu Agrawal AA, Pandey RM. Younger age of escalation of cardiovascular risk factors in Asian Indian subjects.
  5. Ambade M, Kim R, Subramanian SV. Socio-economic distribution of modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular diseases: An analysis of the national longitudinal ageing study in India. Preventive medicine. 2023 Oct 1;175:107696.
  6. Setia MS. Methodology series module 10: Qualitative health research. Indian journal of dermatology. 2017 Jul 1;62(4):367-70.
  7. Setia MS. Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian journal of dermatology. 2016 May 1;61(3):261-4.
  8. Hazra A, Gogtay N. Biostatistics series module 4: comparing groups–categorical variables. Indian journal of dermatology. 2016 Jul 1;61(4):385-92.
  9. Butzer PL, Schmeisser G, Stens RL. An introduction to sampling analysis. Nonuniform sampling: theory and practice. 2001:17-21.
  10. Guariguata L. By the numbers: new estimates from the IDF Diabetes Atlas Update for 2012. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2012 Dec 1;98(3):524-5.
  11. Cochran WG, Mosteller F, Tukey JW. Principles of sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1954 Mar 1;49(265):13-35.
  12. Shrivastava SR, Shrivastava PS, Ramasamy J. Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus. Journal of diabetes & Metabolic disorders. 2013 Dec;12(1):1-5.
  13. Finkelstein L. Widely-defined measurement–An analysis of challenges. Measurement. 2009 Nov 1;42(9):1270-7.
  14. Kirkpatrick L, Feeney B. A simple guide to IBM SPSS: for version 20.0. Nelson education; 2012 Jul 27.
  15. Rajasekharan D, Kulkarni V, Unnikrishnan B, Kumar N, Holla R, Thapar R. Self care activities among patients with diabetes attending a tertiary care hospital in Mangalore Karnataka, India. Annals of medical and health sciences research. 2015 Feb 4;5(1):59-64.
  16. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human participants. JAMA. 2025 Jan 7;333(1):71-4.
  17. Bibbins-Domingo K, Brubaker L, Curfman G. The 2024 revision to the Declaration of Helsinki: modern ethics for medical research. JAMA. 2025 Jan 7;333(1):30-1.
  18. Menikoff J, Kaneshiro J, Pritchard I. The common rule, updated. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):613-5.
  19. Angell M. The ethics of clinical research in the Third World. New England journal of medicine. 1997 Sep 18;337:847-8.
  20. Mensing C, Boucher J, Cypress M, Weinger K, Mulcahy K, Barta P, Hosey G, Kopher W, Lasichak A, Lamb B, Mangan M. National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes care. 2005 Jan 1;28(suppl_1):s72-9.
  21. García-Pérez LE, Álvarez M, Dilla T, Gil-Guillén V, Orozco-Beltrán D. Adherence to therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Therapy. 2013 Dec;4:175-94.
  22. Bailey CJ, Kodack M. Patient adherence to medication requirements for therapy of type 2 diabetes. International journal of clinical practice. 2011 Mar;65(3):314-22.
  23. Packer M. Contrasting effects on the risk of macrovascular and microvascular events of antihyperglycemic drugs that enhance sodium excretion and lower blood pressure. Diabetic Medicine. 2018 Jun;35(6):707-13.
  24. Gnudi L, Karalliedde J. Beat it early: putative renoprotective haemodynamic effects of oral hypoglycaemic agents. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2016 Jul 1;31(7):1036-43.
  25. Galea S, Uddin M, Koenen K. The urban environment and mental disorders: Epigenetic links. Epigenetics. 2011 Apr 1;6(4):400-4.
  26. Maurice J. WHO meeting thrashes out R&D strategy against Zika. The Lancet. 2016 Mar 19;387(10024):1147.
  27. Goorhuis A, Grobusch MP. Zika virus: who’s next?. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases. 2016 Sep 1;16(11):1204-5.
  28. Scheim AI, Rich AJ, Zubizarreta D, Malik M, Baker KE, Restar AJ, van der Merwe LA, Wang J, Beebe B, Ridgeway K, Baral SD. Health status of transgender people globally: a systematic review of research on disease burden and correlates. PLoS One. 2024 Mar 11;19(3):e0299373.
  29. Zhao M, Woodward M, Vaartjes I, Millett ER, Klipstein‐Grobusch K, Hyun K, Carcel C, Peters SA. Sex differences in cardiovascular medication prescription in primary care: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2020 Jun 2;9(11):e014742.
  30. Krass I, Schieback P, Dhippayom T. Adherence to diabetes medication: a systematic review. Diabetic Medicine. 2015 Jun;32(6):725-37.
  31. Sohal T, Sohal P, King-Shier KM, Khan NA. Barriers and facilitators for type-2 diabetes management in South Asians: a systematic review. PloS one. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0136202.
  1. Weber MB, Oza-Frank R, Staimez LR, Ali MK, Venkat Narayan KM. Type 2 diabetes in Asians: prevalence, risk factors, and effectiveness of behavioral intervention at individual and population levels. Annual review of nutrition. 2012 Aug 21;32(1):417-39.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 02
Issue 02
Received 01/04/2025
Accepted 15/05/2025
Published 10/07/2025
Publication Time 100 Days
64

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics