[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]
Open Access
n
[/if 992]n
n
n
n
n
- n t
n
Iyanda Kamoru
[/foreach]
n
n
n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n
- [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t
- Senior Lecturer, Federal University, Gashua Yobe State, Nigeria
n[/if 1175][/foreach]
[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]nn
Abstract
nThis paper examines issues of language decay, survival and change. The fortunes of language can rise and fall and are intimately linked to the fortunes of their speakers. In the modern world, relatively few languages are becoming more widely spoken, and smaller languages are finding it harder and harder to survive. Prospects are not totally dire, though; several smaller languages have been successfully resurrected, and efforts are in motion to do the same for additional languages. Change is one of the unique characteristics of human language.. As long as language is in constant use by human beings, it is subjected to unimaginable change. Any language that no longer changes commits natural linguistic death. This is the fate suffered by classical Hebrew as well as Manx language. These changes occurred initially without the notice of the users but as goes on they become noticeable by the speech community. The survival, change, and death of languages are intricate processes that are closely linked to the destiny of their speakers. A few languages are seeing an increase in speakers in the globalized world of today, whereas lesser languages are finding it difficult to survive. Nevertheless, despite the difficulties, there are reasons for optimism, as attempts to bring endangered languages back to life have showed promise. One of the things that makes language so unique is its fluidity.
n
Keywords: Language, Language Decay, Survival Community and Linguistic
n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Emerging Trends in Languages(etl)]
n
n
n
n
n
n
n[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] nn
n[if 379 not_equal=””]nBrowse Figures
n
n[/if 379]n
References
n[if 1104 equals=””]n
-
Nettle, D. & Romaine, S. (2005). Vanishing Voices. The Extinction of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Jones, M.C. & Sigh I. (2005) Explaining Language Change. London/New York: Routledge.
-
Crystal, D. (2000). Language Death, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Wurn, S.A (1991). Language Death and Disappearance: Causes and Circumstances. In R.H. Robins, & E. M. Uhlenbeck (Eds), Endangered Languages (pp. 135-156). Oxford/New York: Berg.
-
Leonard, W.Y. (2008). When is An ‘Extinct Languages’ Not extinct? In K.A. King, N. Schilling-Estes, L. Fogles.
-
Ohlfearnian, T. (2008). Endangering Language Vitality Through International Development-Ideology, Authority, and Official Standard Irish In the Gaeltacht. In K.A. King, N, Schilling-Estes, L. Fogle, J.J. Lou, & B. Soukup (Eds.), Sustaining Linguistic Diversity: Endangered and Minority Languages and Language Varieties (pp. 113-128). Washington DC: George Town.
-
Archand, J. L. (1996). The Development of Economics and Language: The Search for a Mirage? International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 121(7), 119-57.
-
Ager S. Omniglot: the online encyclopedia of writing systems & languages. Simon Ager; 1998.
-
O’laoire, M. (1996). Hebrew and Irish: Language Revival Revisited. In T. Hickey, & J. Williams (Eds.), Language, Society, and Education in Changing Word. Philedelphia: Multillingual Matters.
-
Fishman, J. (1991). Revising Language Shift. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
-
Fell Man, J. (1973). The Revival of a Classical Tongue. The Hague: Manton.
-
Shahomy, E. (2008). At What Lost? Methods of Languages Revival and Protection. In K.A. King, N. Schilling-Estes, l. Fogle, J. J. Lou & Soukup (Eds.), sustaining linguistic diversity (pp. 205-218) Washington DC. George Town University Press.
-
UNESCO. (2009) UNESCO. Retrieved 0810, 2009, From UNESCO Atlas of The World’s Languages in Danger: http://www.unesco. Org/culture/ich/index.Php?Pg=00139
-
Murtagh, (2007). Out–of-School us of Irish, Motivation and Proficiency in Immersion and Subject-Only Post Primary Programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(4), 428-453.
-
Jacobs, K. A. (1998). Language Obsolescence and Revitalization: Linguistic Change in two Sociolinguistic Contrasting Welsh Communities. Oxford: Clavendor Press.
-
O’neill d. (Ed) (2005). Rebuilding The Celtic Languages: Revising Language shift in the Celtic Countries. Tahybout, Ceredigion: Y. Lolfa.
-
Finegan, E. (2008). Language: its Structure and Use, Fifth (Eds.) Thomson Higher Education, 25 Thomson Place Boston, ma 022010-1202 USA.
nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n
- [foreach 1102]n t
- [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1104]
nn
nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n
n[/if 1114]
n
n
n
| Volume | ||
| [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] | ||
| Received | March 29, 2024 | |
| Accepted | April 16, 2024 | |
| Published | April 24, 2024 |
n
n
n
n
n
nn function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n”}]