From Documentation to Digital Stewardship: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Technological Transformation in Indigenous Knowledge Management

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2026 | Volume : 13 | 03 | Page :
By

Sarfraz Ahmed,

Sudharma Haridasan,

  1. Research Scholar, Department of Library and Information Science, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
  2. Professor, Department of Library and Information Science, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

This bibliometric study systematically maps the technological evolution of Indigenous Knowledge Management (IKM) over a 30-year period (1995–2025). It aims to identify the conceptual shifts and emerging technologies defining the transition from passive digital documentation to active algorithmic stewardship. The study utilises a scientometric approach to analyse a corpus of 835 unique documents retrieved from the Scopus database. Scientific-mapping techniques, including thematic evolution and keyword co-occurrence analysis, were performed using the Bibliometrix (R package) and VOSviewer to visualise the field’s intellectual structure.The research identifies a 19.51% annual growth rate, peaking in 2025, with a focus on Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) technologies. The evolution consists of three waves: early GIS-based spatial capture, a mid-period focus on digital libraries, and a contemporary convergence of AI and Indigenous Data Sovereignty (IDS). While “Data Governance” is a mature motor theme, “Blockchain” and “AI Ethics” represent current innovation frontiers. A persistent “Digital Divide” remains, with leadership concentrated in CANZUS nations and South Africa.This research provides a pioneering longitudinal map of IKM’s technological trajectory. It offers empirical evidence for a strategic paradigm shift toward “Algorithmic Sovereignty”, an indigenous-led approach to advanced computation that ensures ethical and relational preservation of digital heritage.

Keywords: Indigenous Knowledge Management, Digital Stewardship, Artificial Intelligence, Indigenous Data Sovereignty, Bibliometric Analysis

How to cite this article: Sarfraz Ahmed, Sudharma Haridasan. From Documentation to Digital Stewardship: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Technological Transformation in Indigenous Knowledge Management. Journal of Advancements in Library Sciences. 2026; 13(03):-.
How to cite this URL: Sarfraz Ahmed, Sudharma Haridasan. From Documentation to Digital Stewardship: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Technological Transformation in Indigenous Knowledge Management. Journal of Advancements in Library Sciences. 2026; 13(03):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joals/article=2026/view=257532

References

  1. Arias-Pérez J, Cepeda-Cardona J. Knowledge management strategies and organizational improvisation: What changed after the emergence of technological turbulence caused by artificial intelligence? Balt J Manag. 2022;17(2):250–265. doi:10.1108/BJM-01-2021-0027.
  2. Aswani S, Lauer M. Incorporating fishermen’s local knowledge and behavior into geographical information systems (GIS) for designing marine protected areas in Oceania. Hum Organ. 2006;65(1):81–102.
  3. Balogun T. Digitization of Indigenous knowledge systems in Africa: The case of South Africa’s National Recorded System (NRS). Rec Manag J. 2023;33(1):88–102. doi:10.1108/RMJ-10-2022-0029.
  4. Balogun T, Kalusopa T. A framework for digital preservation of Indigenous knowledge system (IKS) in repositories in South Africa. Rec Manag J. 2021;31(2):176–196. doi:10.1108/RMJ-12-2020-0042.
  5. Balogun T, Kalusopa T. Web archiving of indigenous knowledge systems in South Africa. Inf Dev. 2022;38(4):658–671. doi:10.1177/02666669211005522.
  6. Briggs C, Burfurd I, Duckham M, Guntarik O, Kerr D, McMillan M, et al. Bridging the geospatial gap: Data about space and indigenous knowledge of place. Geogr Compass. 2020;14(11). doi:10.1111/gec3.12542.
  7. Bull IK, Marsh DE, Wagner TL. Identities Classified: Indigenous Knowledge Management Systems and Gender in the “Age of Information”. Knowl Organ. 2024;51(4):262–276. doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2024-4-262.
  8. Carroll SR, Garba I, Figueroa-Rodríguez OL, Holbrook J, Lovett R, Materechera S, et al. The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Data Sci J. 2020;19(1):43. doi:10.5334/dsj-2020-043.
  9. Chapman R, Plevel R. Indigenous Copyright Concepts and Indigenous Data Sovereignty: How Libraries and Archives Can Support It. Law Libr J. 2024;116(4):323–367.
  10. Choudhary S, Pareek S, Purohit S, Ambhore V, Roy A, Menaria S. Cultural preservation through AI-generated folk music. ShodhKosh J Vis Perform Arts. 2025. doi: 10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i4s.2025.6829.
  11. Duarte ME, Vigil-Hayes M, Littletree S, Belarde-Lewis M. “Of course, data can never fully represent reality”: Assessing the relationship between “indigenous data” and “indigenous knowledge,” “traditional ecological knowledge,” and “traditional knowledge.” Hum Biol. 2019;91(3):163–178. doi:10.13110/humanbiology.91.3.03.
  12. Fredriksson M. Balancing community rights and national interests in international protection of traditional knowledge: A study of India’s Traditional Knowledge Digital Library. Third World Q. 2022;43(2):352–370. doi:10.1080/01436597.2021.2019009.
  13. Fredriksson M. India’s Traditional Knowledge Digital Library and the Politics of Patent Classifications. Law Critique. 2023;34(1):1–19. doi:10.1007/s10978-021-09299-7.
  14. Hjørland B. Citation analysis: A social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization. Inf Process Manag. 2013; 49:1313–1325. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.001.
  15. Kalbande DT, Suradkar P. Traditional knowledge digital library: A Magic bullet in the war against biopiracy. Libr Philos Pract. 2021; 2021:1–15.
  16. Krishna A. Is traditional knowledge digital library a success? J Intellect Prop Rights. 2019;24(5-6):132–139.
  17. Lawlor B. An overview of the 2022 NISO plus conference: Global conversations/Global Connections. Inf Serv Use. 2022;42(3-4):327–376. doi:10.3233/ISU-220178.
  18. Lawlor B. An overview of the 2023 NISO Plus Conference: Global conversations/global connections. Inf Serv Use. 2023;43(3-4):211–242. doi:10.3233/ISU-230224.
  19. Masenya TM. Revitalization and Digital Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development of Indigenous Communities in South Africa. Ser Libr. 2023;84(5-8):86–102. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2023.2277962.
  20. Moftah N, Alzubi AB. Bridging the Digital–Energy Divide: Artificial Intelligence, Internet Connectivity, and Knowledge Management. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2025;17(19). doi:10.3390/su17198912.
  21. Nakata M. Indigenous Knowledge and the Cultural Interface: Underlying issues at the intersection of Knowledge and Information Systems. IFLA J. 2002;28(5-6):281–291.
  22. Oguamanam C. Information systems and digitization of traditional knowledge: Trends in cultural heritage and memory institutions and the WIPO Genetic Resources Treaty. J World Intellect Prop. 2026;29(1):130–161. doi:10.1111/jwip.70005.
  23. Posit team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R [computer software]. Version 2024.12.0. Boston (MA): Posit Software, PBC; 2025.
  24. Tella A, Jatto EO, Ajani YA. Preserving indigenous knowledge: Leveraging digital technology and artificial intelligence. IFLA J. 2025;51(3 Special Issue: Artificial Intelligence (AI): Transforming Global Librarianship):703–721. doi:10.1177/03400352251342505.
  25. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–538.
  26. Zurba M, Petriello M, Madge C, McCarney P, Bishop B, McBeth S, et al. Learning from knowledge co-production research and practice in the twenty-first century: global lessons and what they mean for collaborative research in Nunatsiavut. Sustain Sci. 2022; 17:449–467. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00996-x.
Ahead of Print Subscription Original Research
Volume 13
03
Received 15/06/2026
Accepted 02/09/2026
Published 24/09/2026
Publication Time 101 Days

Login

My IP

PlumX Metrics

Support