EVALUATING AN AI-SUPPORTED EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING INTERVENTION: A QUASI- EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE JOYFUL SATURDAY MODEL FOR STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND HOLISTIC DEVELOPMENT

Year : 2026 | Volume : 03 | 01 | Page :
    By

    Dr. Bhargav Rajyagor,

  • Paresh Vora,

  1. Associate Professor, Department of Computer Application, Noble University, Junagadh, Gujarat, India
  2. Associate Professor, Department of Computer Application, Noble University, Junagadh, Gujarat, India

Abstract

Student disengagement, declining academic motivation, and passive classroom participation remain major challenges in modern higher education systems. Traditional lecture-based teaching methods often fail to accommodate diverse learning styles and do not sufficiently promote active participation or collaborative learning. To address these challenges, the present study evaluates the effectiveness of Joyful Saturday, a structured experiential learning initiative designed to improve student engagement, motivation, and holistic development through interactive academic activities supported by data-driven evaluation methods. A quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design was implemented over a twelve- week period involving 642 students from both school and college levels. The intervention included structured weekly experiential sessions that incorporated innovation workshops, collaborative problem-solving tasks, reflective learning exercises, and peer-learning activities. Key outcome variables—including student engagement, academic motivation, attendance, psychological well-being, and collaborative skills—were measured using validated psychometric instruments with strong reliability indicators. Statistical analysis was conducted using paired sample t-tests, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), and multiple regression analysis to examine the effectiveness and robustness of the intervention.
The results demonstrate statistically significant improvements across all measured variables (p < .001), with effect sizes ranging from moderate to high (d = 0.48–0.92). Engagement scores increased substantially, accompanied by notable improvements in motivation, attendance rates, and student well-being. Regression analysis further revealed that collaborative participation emerged as the strongest predictor of positive academic outcomes (R² = 0.61), highlighting the importance of peer interaction in experiential learning environments. Overall, the findings indicate that structured experiential learning initiatives supported by analytical evaluation can significantly enhance student engagement and academic development. The Joyful Saturday model offers a scalable and practical framework for integrating experiential learning with data-driven educational decision-making, providing valuable implications for institutional innovation and policy development in contemporary higher education systems.

Keywords: Experiential learning, Student engagement, Artificial intelligence in education, Active learning, Educational innovation, Collaborative learning, Learning analytics

How to cite this article:
Dr. Bhargav Rajyagor, Paresh Vora. EVALUATING AN AI-SUPPORTED EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING INTERVENTION: A QUASI- EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE JOYFUL SATURDAY MODEL FOR STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND HOLISTIC DEVELOPMENT. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2026; 03(01):-.
How to cite this URL:
Dr. Bhargav Rajyagor, Paresh Vora. EVALUATING AN AI-SUPPORTED EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING INTERVENTION: A QUASI- EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE JOYFUL SATURDAY MODEL FOR STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND HOLISTIC DEVELOPMENT. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2026; 03(01):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijbsc/article=2026/view=246946


References

  1. Bergdahl N, Bond M, Sjöberg J, Dougherty M, Oxley E. Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: a systematic review. International Journal of  Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2024 Dec 20;21(1):63.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00493-y
  2. Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research. 2004 Mar;74(1):59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  3.  Kahu ER. Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in higher education. 2013 Jun 1;38(5):758-773.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
  4.  Kolb AY, Kolb DA. Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of management learning & education. 2005 Jun 1;4(2):193-212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
  5. Orim FS, Ofem UJ, Edam-Agbor IB, Nsan NN, Okri JA, Ekpang P, Ogunjimi B, Egbe IM, Ukatu JO, Angrey CU, Undie MA. Implementation of automated
    classroom assessment in higher education using the technology acceptance model. Discover Education. 2025 Apr 17;4(1):87.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00481-y
  6.  Pham VB, Chau TH. Student engagement in the context of post-COVID: A case of higher education institutions. International Journal of Instruction. 2024 Apr
    1;17(2):321-34. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17218a
  7. Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education. 2004 Jul;93(3):223-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-
    9830.2004.tb00809.x
  8. Shivaramu HT, Aveen KP, Ullal VN. The role of experiential learning in improving academic performance and student satisfaction in engineering
    education. Discover Education. 2025 Dec;4(1):545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01019-y
  9.  Siemens G, Baker RS. Learning analytics and educational data mining: towards communication and collaboration. InProceedings of the 2nd international
    conference on learning analytics and knowledge 2012 Apr 29 (pp. 252-254). https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3029435
  10. Vermeulen EJ, Volman ML. Promoting student engagement in online education: Online learning experiences of Dutch university students. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2024 Jun;29(2):941-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09704-3
  11.  Zepke N, Leach L. Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active learning in higher education. 2010 Nov;11(3):167-77.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410379680
  12. Zou W, Drake AP, Masur PK, Whitlock J, Bazarova NN. Examining learners’ engagement patterns and knowledge outcome in an experiential learning intervention for youth’s social media literacy. Computers & Education. 2024 Jul 1;216:105046.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105046
Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume 03
01
Received 16/03/2026
Accepted 29/05/2026
Published 30/05/2026
Publication Time 75 Days
15

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics