Striking A Balance: Ethical Guidelines for A.I. Integration in Mental Health Services

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2025 | Volume : | : | Page : –
By
vector

Bharti Pathania,

vector

Niyati Jeevandas Jogi,

vector

Aastha Govind Shirodker,

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Arts (Psychology), MIE- SPPU Institute of Higher Education, Doha, Qatar
  2. Student, Department of Arts (Psychology), MIE- SPPU Institute of Higher Education, Doha, Qatar
  3. Assistant Professor, Department of Arts (Psychology), MIE- SPPU Institute of Higher Education, Doha, Qatar

Abstract document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_130953’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration in mental health services presents opportunities and challenges. This study examines ethical considerations and proposes guidelines for responsible AI implementation in mental healthcare. The rapid advancement of AI technologies has sparked both excitement and concern within the mental health community, necessitating a thorough examination of their potential benefits and risks. By addressing these ethical considerations, this research aims to contribute to the development of a framework that ensures the responsible and effective use of AI in mental health services. Methods: The study analyzed current AI applications in mental health, including chatbots, predictive analytics, and personalized treatment recommendations. Interdisciplinary perspectives were used to develop a comprehensive framework of ethical guidelines. Results: A set of ethical guidelines was proposed, emphasizing transparency, accountability, and continuous evaluation of AI systems. The study highlighted the importance of collaboration between mental health professionals, AI developers, ethicists, and patients. The potential impact on therapeutic relationships and the need for human judgment in clinical decision-making were addressed. Discussion: The findings underscore the need for updated professional training and regulatory policies to address the evolving landscape of AI in mental healthcare. The study argues for a balanced approach that harnesses AI’s potential while safeguarding patient welfare and professional integrity. The integration of AI in mental health services represents a paradigm shift in the field, offering new possibilities for improved diagnosis, treatment, and patient care. However, it also raises complex ethical questions regarding privacy, informed consent, and the potential for algorithmic bias. As AI continues to evolve, ongoing research and dialogue among stakeholders will be crucial to ensure that its implementation aligns with ethical standards and enhances, rather than compromises, the quality of mental health care.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, ethical guidelines, mental health, predictive analytics, regulatory policies

How to cite this article:
Bharti Pathania, Niyati Jeevandas Jogi, Aastha Govind Shirodker. Striking A Balance: Ethical Guidelines for A.I. Integration in Mental Health Services. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2025; ():-.
How to cite this URL:
Bharti Pathania, Niyati Jeevandas Jogi, Aastha Govind Shirodker. Striking A Balance: Ethical Guidelines for A.I. Integration in Mental Health Services. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2025; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijbsc/article=2025/view=0

References
document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_130953’);});Edit

  1. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature medicine. 2019 Jan;25(1):44-56.
  2. World Health Organization. Mental health atlas 2020: review of the Eastern Mediterranean Region.
  3. De Freitas J, Uğuralp AK, Oğuz‐Uğuralp Z, Puntoni S. Chatbots and mental health: Insights into the safety of generative AI. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2024 Jul;34(3):481-91.
  4. Franklin JC, Ribeiro JD, Fox KR, Bentley KH, Kleiman EM, Huang X, Musacchio KM, Jaroszewski AC, Chang BP, Nock MK. Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Psychological bulletin. 2017 Feb;143(2):187.
  5. Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-53.
  6. Bhirud N, Tataale S, Randive S, Nahar S. A literature review on chatbots in healthcare domain. International journal of scientific & technology research. 2019 Jul;8(7):225-31.
  7. Boucher EM, Harake NR, Ward HE, Stoeckl SE, Vargas J, Minkel J, Parks AC, Zilca R. Artificially intelligent chatbots in digital mental health interventions: a review. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2021 Dec 3;18(sup1):37-49.
  8. Fitzpatrick KK, Darcy A, Vierhile M. Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial. JMIR mental health. 2017 Jun 6;4(2):e7785.
  9. Molli VL. Effectiveness of AI-Based Chatbots in Mental Health Support: A Systematic Review. Journal of Healthcare AI and ML. 2022 Jul 17;9(9):1-1.
  10. Coghlan S, Leins K, Sheldrick S, Cheong M, Gooding P, D’Alfonso S. To chat or bot to chat: Ethical issues with using chatbots in mental health. Digital health. 2023 Jun; 9:20552076231183542.
  11. Lucas GM, Rizzo A, Gratch J, Scherer S, Stratou G, Boberg J, Morency LP. Reporting mental health symptoms: breaking down barriers to care with virtual human interviewers. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 2017 Oct 12; 4:51.
  12. Oh KJ, Lee D, Ko B, Choi HJ. A chatbot for psychiatric counseling in mental healthcare services based on emotional dialogue analysis and sentence generation. In2017 18th IEEE international conference on mobile data management (MDM) 2017 May 29 (pp. 371-375). IEEE.
  13. Bentley KH, Franklin JC, Ribeiro JD, Kleiman EM, Fox KR, Nock MK. Anxiety and its disorders as risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Clinical psychology review. 2016 Feb 1; 43:30-46.
  14. D’alfonso S, Santesteban-Echarri O, Rice S, Wadley G, Lederman R, Miles C, Gleeson J, Alvarez-Jimenez M. Artificial intelligence-assisted online social therapy for youth mental health. Frontiers in psychology. 2017 Jun 2; 8:796.
  15. Birtola-Bruzzone M, Rodríguez JA, Marchesi VT, Fraile-Ramos A. Harnessing artificial intelligence to revolutionize mental health care: The role of machine learning in personalized therapy. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 2023; 150:102610.
  16. Benfato I, Sorrenti L, Rallo F. Digitalization and mental health: Opportunities and challenges for psychiatric practice. Italian Journal of Psychiatry. 2023;39(1):1–11.
  17. Abd-Alrazaq AA, Rababeh A, Alajlani M, Bewick BM, Househ M. Effectiveness and safety of using chatbots to improve mental health: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of medical Internet research. 2020 Jul 13;22(7): e16021.
  18. Floridi L, Cowls J, Beltrametti M, Chatila R, Chazerand P, Dignum V, Luetge C, Madelin R, Pagallo U, Rossi F, Schafer B. AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and machines. 2018 Dec; 28:689-707.
  19. Schick A, Feine J, Morana S, Maedche A, Reininghaus U. Validity of chatbot use for mental health assessment: experimental study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2022 Oct 31;10(10): e28082.
  20. Luxton DD. Recommendations for the ethical use and design of artificial intelligent care providers. Artificial intelligence in medicine. 2014 Sep 1;62(1):1-0.
  21. Boucher EM, Harake NR, Ward HE, Stoeckl SE, Vargas J, Minkel J, Parks AC, Zilca R. Artificially intelligent chatbots in digital mental health interventions: a review. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2021 Dec 3;18(sup1):37-49.
  22. Vaidyam AN, Wisniewski H, Halamka JD, Kashavan MS, Torous JB. Chatbots and conversational agents in mental health: a review of the psychiatric landscape. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;64(7):456-64.
  23. Cassidy SA, Bradley L, Bowen E, Wigham S, Rodgers J. Measurement properties of tools used to assess suicidality in autistic and general population adults: A systematic review. Clinical psychology review. 2018 Jun 1; 62:56-70.
  24. Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature machine intelligence. 2019 Sep;1(9):389-99.
  25. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Gleeson JF. Connecting the dots: twenty-first century technologies to tackle twenty-first century challenges in early intervention. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;46(12):1194-6.
  26. Wykes T, Lipshitz J, Schueller SM. Towards the design of ethical standards related to digital mental health and all its applications. Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 15; 6:232-42.
  27. Viduani A, Cosenza V, Araújo RM, Kieling C. Chatbots in the field of mental health: Challenges and opportunities. Digital Mental Health: A Practitioner’s Guide. 2023 Jan 1:133-48.
  28. Kretzschmar K, Tyroll H, Pavarini G, Manzini A, Singh I, NeurOx Young People’s Advisory Group. Can your phone be your therapist? Young people’s ethical perspectives on the use of fully automated conversational agents (chatbots) in mental health support. Biomedical informatics insights. 2019 Feb; 11:1178222619829083.
Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume
Received 03/11/2024
Accepted 03/12/2024
Published 03/01/2025
138