[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n
n
Open Access
nn
n
n[/if 992]n
n
n
n
n
n
Pravin M. Sarwade, Vaibhav B. Chavan,
n
- n t
n
n
n[/foreach]
n
n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n
- [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t
- Student, Associate Professor Department of civil, Shreeyash College of Engineering & Technology, Maharashtra, India, Department of civil, Shreeyash College of Engineering & Technology, Maharashtra, India
n[/if 1175][/foreach]
n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n
Abstract
nFloating pontoons are the new advance method and technology in construction industry. Land issue is
very common issue in various countries. Constructing on waters and in the waters is the only option to
overcome the land issue. Also, the construction of the bridges and other water-based structures also
can be constructed by using pontoons. Pontoons are being used in the construction since ancient time
Including temporary bridges and small shelters. It’s also used by the military for the emergency time.
In this study the details of the pontoons prepared from concrete, which are used in the water-based
construction is discussed. Pontoons are basically exposed to three main forces i.e. water current forces,
wave forces and wind forces. This study focused on the stability of the pontoons under application of
the forces and helps to understand the nature of the pontoon construction with floating breakwater.
Floating breakwater are used to reduce the wave intensity of the wave and reducing the intensity of the
wave force. In this study the behavior of the pontoon in relative depth of waters. And observe the results
of the waves and water currents on each level of the pontoon depth. The waves are stronger and produce
high effect on the surface than the bottom layers of the same waters. The same wave has lowered
magnitude and wave height at the bottom levels of the waters compare to the surface of the waters.
Mooring system is provided from the bottom topography of the sea bed or land. By using strong cables.
These cables are connected strongly between pontoon and fixed support
n
Keywords: Pontoon, floating structure, floating breakwater, mooring system, constructing on waters
n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Industrial Safety Engineering(joise)]
n
n
n
n
n
nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n
nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n
Browse Figures
n
n[/if 379]n
References
n[if 1104 equals=””]n
1. Sun J, Jiang P, Sun Y, Song C, Wang D. An experimental investigation on the nonlinear
hydroelastic response of a pontoon-type floating bridge under regular wave action. Int J Eng Res
Technol. 2023;12(4):215-226.
2. Raftoyiannis IG, Avraam TP, Michaltsos GT. Analytical models of floating bridges under moving
loads. Eng Struct. 2021;233: 111728.
3. Ghanim AD, Ibrahim MM, Hassan MA. Effect of floating bridges on bottom topography. Ocean
Eng. 2020;217: 107847.
4. Viuff T, Leira BJ, Xiang X, Øiseth O. Effects of wave directionality on extreme response for a long
end-anchored floating bridge. Mar Struct. 2020;71: 102749.
5. Cheng Z, Gao Z, Moan T. Extreme responses and associated uncertainties for a long end-anchored
floating bridge. Mar Struct. 2018;59: 1-15.
6. Petersen ØW, Øiseth O, Lourens E. Full-scale identification of the wave forces exerted on a floating
bridge using inverse methods and directional wave spectrum estimation. Mar Struct. 2017;53: 77-
93.
7. Kvåle KA, Sigbjörnsson R, Øiseth O. Modelling the stochastic dynamic behaviour of a pontoon
bridge: A case study. Eng Struct. 2017;153: 441-452.
8. Sha Y, Amdahl J, Aalberg A, Yu Z. Numerical investigations of the dynamic response of a floating
bridge under environmental loadings. Mar Struct. 2018;60: 175-196.
9. Cheng Z, Gao Z, Moan T. Numerical modeling and dynamic analysis of a floating bridge subjected
to wind, wave, and current loads. Appl Ocean Res. 2017;64: 144-157.
10. Kvåle KA, Øiseth O, Rønnquist A. Operational modal analysis of an end-supported pontoon bridge.
Mar Struct. 2017;55: 177-198.
11. Shi QJ, Xu DL, Zhang HC, Zhao H, Wu YS. Optimized stiffness combination of a flexible-base
hinged connector for very large floating structures. Appl Ocean Res. 2016; 59:1-10.
12. Petersen ØW, Øiseth O. Sensitivity-based finite element model updating of a pontoon bridge. Eng
Struct. 2016;115: 142-154.
nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n
- [foreach 1102]n t
- [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1104]
nn
nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n
n[/if 1114]
n
n
n
| Volume | ||
| [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] | ||
| Received | July 17, 2024 | |
| Accepted | July 24, 2024 | |
| Published | July 26, 2024 |
n
n
n
n
n
n nfunction myFunction2() {nvar x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);nif (x.style.display === “block”) {nx.style.display = “none”;n}nelse { x.style.display = “Block”; }n}ndocument.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(-1);n});ndocument.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(1);n});nvar slideIndex = 1;nshowSlides(slideIndex);nfunction changeSlides(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex += n));n}nfunction currentSlide(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex = n));n}nfunction showSlides(n) {nvar i;nvar slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);nvar dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);nif (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }nif (n (item.style.display = “none”));nArray.from(dots).forEach(nitem => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n);nslides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;ndots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n}n”}]