[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n
n
Open Access
nn
n
n[/if 992]n
n
n
n
n
n
Veerpal Kaur, Bhupinderjit Kaur Heer, Mado Sangyu,
n
- n t
n
n
n[/foreach]
n
n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n
- [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t
- Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Student Dolphin (PG)College of Science and Agriculture Chunni Kalan, Fatehgarh Sahib, Dolphin (PG)College of Science and Agriculture Chunni Kalan, Fatehgarh Sahib, Dolphin (PG)College of Science and Agriculture Chunni Kalan, Fatehgarh Sahib Punjab, Punjab, Punjab India, India, India
n[/if 1175][/foreach]
n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n
Abstract
nThe present study was conducted assess of Phytoplankton and zooplankton from a Pond in Bhagrana, Fatehgharh Sahib, Punjab, India. Water samples were collected on a monthly basis, from January 2020 to March 2020, using a ring type terracotta net plankton net (24 meshes/mm2 mesh size) and 50 L were filtered through it to collect plankton sample. For the qualitative analysis, plankton was identified in general. The faunal community was observed to be significantly dominated by phytoplankton. Five Orders of planktons were recorded viz. Chlorophyceae, Euglenophyceae, Bacillariophyceae, Cyanophyceae and Dinophyceae. 19 genera of phytoplankton. The phytoplankton community was dominated by, in the order: Chlorophyceae > Euglenophyceae > Bacillariophyceae > Cyanophyceae > Dinophyceae. Bacillariophyceae, Cyanophyceae and Dinophyceae. Chlorophyceae includes species of Clamydomonas sp., Volvox sp., Sphaerocystis sp., Pediastrum sp., Ankistrodesmus sp., Closterium sp., Cosmarium sp., Oedogonium sp., Ulothrix sp., Scenedesmus sp. Euglenophyceae includes species of Euglena sp. and Phacus sp. Bacillariophyceae includes species of Cyclotella sp. Diatoma spp. and Synedra sp. Cyanophyceae includes species of Microcystis sp., Oscillatoria sp., Nostoc sp. Dinophyceae has been represented by one species i.e. Peridium sp. 9 The zooplankton found consisted of the following species: Copepoda, Rotifera, Cladocera, and Protozoa. The zooplankton community was dominated by parasites, followed by Copepoda, Rotifera, and Cladocera. Protozoa includes species of Amoeba sp., Trinema sp. and Paramecium sp. Rotifera have been represented by Brachionus sp. and Rotaria sp. Cladocera includes Daphnia sp. and Moina sp. Group Copepoda includes Diaptomus sp. and Cyclops sp. . The zooplankton abundance was found to be less during the January and Feb month and only slight increase in almost all the zooplanktons have been observed in month of March
n
Keywords: Phytoplankton, Zooplankton, Monitoring, Pond ecosystem, Fish
n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to International Journal of Marine Life(ijml)]
n
n
n
n
n
nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n
nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n
Browse Figures
n
n[/if 379]n
References
n[if 1104 equals=””]n
- Akter S, Rahman M, Al Faruk M, Mahmud N, Bhuiyan H, Hossain A, Abdullah-Al-Asif. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of phytoplankton in culture pond of Noakhali district, Bangladesh. 2018;6(4):371.
- Kuczynska-Kippen N, Anna B. Differentiated macrophyte types as a habitat for rotifers in small mid forest water bodies. Biomed Life Sci. 2009;1100-7.
- Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 14th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1985. p. 119
- Carpenter SR, Kitchell JE. The trophic cascade in lakes. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
- Bhatnagar A, Kalla A, Johal MS. Experimental ichthyology. New Delhi: CBS Publishers; 2002.
- Irfan JAR, Yousuf AR, Parveen M, Hassan K, Rehman M, Sheikh BA. Rotifer community in Manasbal Lake of Kashmir. Int J Fish Aquat Stud. 2014;1(6):190-8.
- Neves IF, Recha O, Roche KF, Pinto AA. Zooplankton community structure of two marginal lakes of the River Cuiaba (Mato Grosso, Brazil) with analysis of Rotifera and Cladocera diversity. Braz J Biol. 2003;63:1-20.
- Paerl HW, Huisman J. Climate change: A catalyst for global expansion of harmful cyanobacterial blooms. Environ Microbiol. 2009;1:27-37.
- Phillips EJ, Cichra M, Havens K, Hanlon C, Badylak S, Rueter B, et al. [Title of the article]. J Plankton Res. 1997;[volume number](issue number):19-319.
- Ramakrishna S. Zooplankton seasonal abundance in relation to physico-chemical features in Yelahanka Lake, Bangalore. Glob J Res Anal. 2014;3(6):218-9.
- Saxena A, Srivastava P. Primary production by phytoplankton in a sewage-fed lake and energy transformation to fish yield. J Pollut Res. 2001;20(4):613-7.
- Saxena A, Srivastava P. Primary production by phytoplankton in a sewage-fed lake and energy transformation to fish yield. J Pollut Res. 2001;20(4):613-7.
- Tilman D. Resource competition and community structure. New York: Princeton University Press; 1982.
- Ward GP, Whipple GC. Fresh water biology. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1992.
- Verma R, Singh UB, Singh GP. Seasonal distribution of phytoplankton in Laddia Dam in Sikar District of Rajasthan. Vegetos. 2012;25(2):165-73.
- Singh UB, Ahluwalia AS. Microalgae: a promising tool for carbon sequestration. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. 2013;18:73-95.
- Bellinger EG, Sigee DC. Freshwater algae: identification and use as bioindicators. UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n
- [foreach 1102]n t
- [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1104]
nn
nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n
n[/if 1114]
n
n
n
| Volume | ||
| [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] | ||
| Received | August 7, 2024 | |
| Accepted | August 9, 2024 | |
| Published | August 9, 2024 |
n
n
n
n
n
n nfunction myFunction2() {nvar x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);nif (x.style.display === “block”) {nx.style.display = “none”;n}nelse { x.style.display = “Block”; }n}ndocument.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(-1);n});ndocument.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(1);n});nvar slideIndex = 1;nshowSlides(slideIndex);nfunction changeSlides(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex += n));n}nfunction currentSlide(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex = n));n}nfunction showSlides(n) {nvar i;nvar slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);nvar dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);nif (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }nif (n (item.style.display = “none”));nArray.from(dots).forEach(nitem => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n);nslides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;ndots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n}n”}]