Quality Dimensions of Open Access E-Journals in Library and Information Science: An Analytical Study

Year : 2025 | Volume : 12 | Issue : 03 | Page : 52 68
    By

    kaushal Chauhan,

  1. Librarian, Department of Library and Information Science, MDSD College, Ambala, Haryana, India

Abstract

The rapid growth of open access e-journals in Library and Information Science marks a significant transformation today. Open access journals provide unrestricted access to peer-reviewed research, enabling LIS professionals, researchers, and students worldwide to access required knowledge without subscription barriers. This study focuses on evaluating open access (OA) e-journals in Library and Information Science (LIS), with particular attention to their accessibility, quality, and scholarly impact. The main objectives of the study are to identify and categorize prominent OA e-journals in LIS; evaluate their quality based on indexing, impact factors, and peer review standards; analyze their accessibility in terms of licensing models, and assess their impact on academic research. The study adopts a mixed-methods approach, integrating both quantitative and qualitative analyses. A sample of top-ranked LIS OA e-journals was selected to evaluate The analysis indicates that OA e-journals in LIS generally meet high standards for accessibility, with the majority adopting Creative Commons licensing. Many journals are indexed in reputable databases, enhancing visibility and academic impact. Findings also show that OA e-journals contribute significantly. OA e-journals in LIS play a crucial role in expanding access to research and facilitating knowledge sharing among scholars and practitioners. Despite challenges in maintaining rigorous peer review and achieving high impact factors, the overall trend shows promising growth in quality and accessibility. This paper has significant practical utility as it helps librarians optimize collection development, reduce costs, and promote high-quality resources; for researchers and students, it ensures free access to scholarly content, enhances publication opportunities and supports skill development. Policymakers can use such studies to advocate open science and evaluate the impact of open-access initiatives. LIS educators benefit by integrating findings into curricula and using them as case studies. Additionally, publishers can refine their models for sustainability and innovation. Overall, the study fosters global knowledge sharing, affordability, and equitable access to resources.

Keywords: E-resources, e-journals, open access e-resources, open access e-journals, LIS E-journals, free to access E-journals, open educational e-resources, publicly available LIS E-journal

[This article belongs to Journal of Advancements in Library Sciences ]

How to cite this article:
kaushal Chauhan. Quality Dimensions of Open Access E-Journals in Library and Information Science: An Analytical Study. Journal of Advancements in Library Sciences. 2025; 12(03):52-68.
How to cite this URL:
kaushal Chauhan. Quality Dimensions of Open Access E-Journals in Library and Information Science: An Analytical Study. Journal of Advancements in Library Sciences. 2025; 12(03):52-68. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joals/article=2025/view=234554


References

  1. Singh, S., & Chander, H. (2019). Benefits of open access e-journals in LIS. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2312. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2312
  2. Ghosh, S. B. (2009). Open access and institutional repositories – A developing country perspective: A case study of India. Library Review, 58(4), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530910952831
  3. Piwowar, H. A., Priem, J., Pschorn, M., & Gallo, C. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
  4. Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342(6154), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6154.60
  5. Beall, J. (2016). Predatory journals: Ban predators from the scientific record. Nature, 534(7607), 326. https://doi.org/10.1038/534326a
  6. Grogg, Jill E. (2008). Educating for electronic resources. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 20(1), 11–15.
  7. Smith, Alastair G. (2005). Citations and links as a measure of effectiveness of online LIS journals. IFLA Journal, 31, 76–84.
  8. Beck, S. E. (1997). The good, the bad & the ugly: Evaluating electronic journals. Computers in Libraries, 34–43.
  9. Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). About DOAJ. Retrieved October 10, 2024, from https://doaj.org/about
  10. Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) versus non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1045/june2004-harnad
  11. Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. PLoS ONE, 7(9), e47500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047500
  12. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallières, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., … & Hilf, E. R. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review, 30(4), 310–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2004.10764930
  13. Duy, T. H., & Senn, S. (2021). Open access journal quality: Perceptions and practices of library and information science scholars in Vietnam. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1– https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4855
  14. Solomon, D. J., & Bjork, B.C, (2012). A study of open access publishing models and their implications for researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1485–1495. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22673
  15. Machin-Mastromatteo, J. D., & Secker, J. (2015). The role of open access e-journals in LIS education and practice. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(6), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.07.004
  16. Xia, J. (2020). Current trends and future directions in LIS open access publishing. Library Hi Tech, 38(3), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-03-2020-0076
  17. Björk, B. C. (2023). The citation advantage of open access publishing: A review of recent literature. Journal of Scholarly Communication Research, 15(2), 145–160.
  18. Johnson, R., Williams, K., & Smith, A. (2024). Transformative agreements and their impact on library practices. Library Trends, 72(1), 12–35.
  19. Macharia, J. M., Omondi, F., & Njoroge, L. (2023). Equity and access in open access publishing: The role of funding models. African Journal of Information Science, 18(3), 98–113.
  20. Piwowar, H., Priem, J., & Orr, R. (2023). Trends in open access publishing: Global perspectives. PLoS ONE, 18(6), e0278264.
  21. Smith, A., Sweeney, J., & Thomas, C. (2024). Bibliodiversity in scholarly publishing: Opportunities and challenges. College & Research Libraries News, 85(1), 34–45.
  22. Suber, P. (2023). Open Access in 2023: Progress and pitfalls. Open Access Quarterly, 30(4), 22–41.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 12
Issue 03
Received 22/10/2025
Accepted 25/10/2025
Published 19/12/2025
Publication Time 58 Days
86

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics