Effects of Halloysite Nano particle Reinforcement of Epoxy Composite Using a Diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A Prepared by Ultrasonication Casting

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2026 | Volume : 14 | 04 | Page :
By

Ritesh Dixit,

Anil Kumar,

Shakun Srivastava,

Anurag Mishra,

Kheelraj Pandey,

  1. PhD scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  2. Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  3. Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
  4. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  5. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

This study explores a simple and operative approach for developing stronger epoxy-based composite materials by incorporating halloysite nanotubes (HNTs). The composites were made-up through hydraulic compression casting, combining ultrasonic mixing with applied pressure to produce consolidated composite sheets. HNTs were added to the epoxy resin at concentrations ranging from 1 to 5 wt.% at approximately 60°C, and the subsequent composites were examined to understand their internal structure, nanotube dispersion, and the presence of voids or defects. The findings establish that the incorporation of HNTs can significantly improve the physical and mechanical performance of the epoxy matrix. Among the compositions inspected, the composite containing 3 wt.% HNTs prepared with ultrasonic mixing exhibited the most favorable overall performance. Compared with neat epoxy, this preparation showed an approximately 9% increase in density and a substantial 34% enhancement in tensile strength. X-ray analysis further confirmed a comparatively uniform distribution of HNTs throughout the epoxy matrix, which contributed to the improved mechanical properties. In addition, good agreement between the experimental results and numerical simulations maintained the reliability of the findings. Overall, the study demonstrates that a moderately small addition of HNTs, particularly at 3 wt.%, can effectively enhance the density and tensile strength of epoxy composites. The planned fabrication method is straightforward and has potential for producing high-performance composite sheets for a range of engineering applications.

Keywords: Ultrasonication; Epoxy; Halloysite Nanotubes; tensile analysis; Finite component technique; XRD

How to cite this article: Ritesh Dixit, Anil Kumar, Shakun Srivastava, Anurag Mishra, Kheelraj Pandey. Effects of Halloysite Nano particle Reinforcement of Epoxy Composite Using a Diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A Prepared by Ultrasonication Casting. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(04):-.
How to cite this URL: Ritesh Dixit, Anil Kumar, Shakun Srivastava, Anurag Mishra, Kheelraj Pandey. Effects of Halloysite Nano particle Reinforcement of Epoxy Composite Using a Diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A Prepared by Ultrasonication Casting. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(04):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2026/view=254100

References

1. Ayatollahi MR, Shadlou S, Shokrieh MM. Fracture toughness of epoxy/multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposites under bending and shear loading conditions. Mater Des. 2011;32:2115-2124. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.034.
2. Azeez AA, Rhee KY, Park SJ, Hui D. Epoxy clay nanocomposites–processing, properties and applications: a review. Compos Part B Eng. 2013;45:308-320. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.012.
3. Ragosta GM, Abbate P, Musto P, Scarinzi G, Mascia L. Epoxy-silica particulate nanocomposites: chemical interactions, reinforcement and fracture toughness. Polymer. 2005;46:10506-10516. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2005.08.028.
4. Gupta MK, Singhal V, Rajput NS. Applications and challenges of carbon-fibres reinforced composites: a review. Evergreen. 2022;9:682-693. doi:10.5109/4843099.
5. Ye Y, Chen H, Wu J, Ye L. High impact strength epoxy nanocomposites with natural nanotubes. Polymer. 2007;48:6426-6433. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2007.08.035.
6. Deng S, Zhang J, Ye L. Halloysite-epoxy nanocomposites with improved particle dispersion through ball mill homogenisation and chemical treatments. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69:2497-2505. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.001.
7. Lam C, Lau K, Cheung H, Ling HY. Effect of ultrasound sonication in nanoclay clusters of nanoclay/epoxy composites. Mater Lett. 2005;59:1369-1372. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2004.12.048.
8. Gupta ML, Stefanie AS, Schnorr JM, Woo DJ, Osswald S, Swager TM, et al. Effect of mixing methods on the dispersion of carbon nanotubes during solvent-free processing of MWCNT/epoxy composites. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys. 2013;51:410-420. doi:10.1002/polb.23225.
9. Mohan TP, Kanny K, Velmurugan R. Epoxy-clay nanocomposites: effect of curing temperature on mechanical properties. Int J Plast Technol. 2009;13:123-132. doi:10.1007/s12588-009-0010-6.
10. Thostenson ET, Chou TW. Processing-structure-multifunctional property relationship in carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Carbon. 2006;44:3022-3029. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2006.05.014.
11. Yasmin A, Abot JL, Daniel IM. Processing of clay/epoxy nanocomposites by shear mixing. Scripta Mater. 2003;49:81-86. doi:10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00173-8.
12. Lun H, Liang GZ, Ma X, Zhang B, Chen X. Epoxy/clay nanocomposites: further exfoliation of newly modified clay induced by shearing force of ball milling. Polym Int. 2004;53:1545-1553. doi:10.1002/pi.1596.
13. Patil DS, Bhoomkar MM. Investigation on mechanical behaviour of fiber-reinforced advanced polymer composite materials. Evergreen. 2023;10:765-773. doi:10.5109/6781040.
14. Lau K, Lu M, Lam C, Cheung H, Sheng FM, Li H. Thermal and mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotube bundle-reinforced epoxy nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol. 2005;65:719-725. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.10.005.
15. Reza M, Najafi F, Bakhshandeh E, Khonakdar H, Mostafaiyan M, Simon F, et al. Highly curable epoxy/MWCNT nanocomposites: an effective approach to functionalization of carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng J. 2015;259:117-125. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.116.
16. Puglia D, Valentini L, Kenny JM. Analysis of the cure reaction of carbon nanotubes/epoxy resin composites through thermal analysis and Raman spectroscopy. J Appl Polym Sci. 2003;88:452-458. doi:10.1002/app.11745.
17. Kun T, Yang S, Grunlan JC, Kim YS, Dang B, Deng Y, et al. Effects of carbon nanotube fillers on the curing processes of epoxy resin-based composites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2006;102:5248-5254. doi:10.1002/app.24773.
18. Abdalla M, Dean D, Robinson P, Nyairo E. Cure behavior of epoxy/MWCNT nanocomposites: effect of nanotube surface modification. Polymer. 2008;49:3310-3317. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2008.05.016.
19. Hiroaki M, Drzal LT. Thermo-physical and impact properties of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced by single-wall carbon nanotubes. Polymer. 2004;45:5163-5170. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2004.05.036.
20. Sosiati H, Yuniar NDM, Saputra D, Hamdan S. Influence of carbon fiber content on tensile, flexural, and thermal properties of sisal/PMMA composites. Evergreen. 2022;9:32-40. doi:10.5109/4774214.
21. Sick SK, Kim DS. Curing behavior and structure of an epoxy/clay nanocomposite system. Polym Eng Sci. 2006;46:1318-1325. doi:10.1002/pen.20597.
22. Mohan TP, Ramesh M, Velmurugan R. Rheology and curing characteristics of epoxy-clay nanocomposites. Polym Int. 2005;54:1653-1659. doi:10.1002/pi.1897.
23. Li W, Hou L, Zhou Q, Yan L, Loo LS. Curing behavior and rheology properties of alkyl-imidazolium-treated rectorite/epoxy nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci. 2013;53:2470-2477. doi:10.1002/pen.23500.
24. Wahyu PR, Soenoko R, Purnowidodo A, Choiron A. Characterization of sodium bicarbonate treated zalacca fibers as composite reinforcements. Evergreen. 2019;6:29-38. doi:10.5109/2321001.
25. Ratna D, Khan S, Barman S, Chakraborty BC. Synthesis of vinylester-clay nanocomposites: influence of clay nature on properties. Open Macromol J. 2012;6. doi:10.2174/1874343901206010059.
26. Xavier K, Lindberg H, Berglund LA. Synthesis of epoxy-clay nanocomposites: influence of clay nature on structure. Polymer. 2001;42:1303-1310. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00346-3.
27. Deng S, Zhang J, Ye L, Wu J. Toughening epoxies with halloysite nanotubes. Polymer. 2008;49:5119-5127. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.027.
28. Tang Y, Deng S, Ye L, Yang C, Yuan Q, Zhang J, et al. Effects of unfolded and intercalated halloysites on mechanical properties of halloysite-epoxy nanocomposites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2011;42:345-354. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.003.
29. Ismail H, Pasbakhsh P, Fauzi MNA, Bakar AA. Effect of halloysite nanotubes on curing behaviour and properties of EPDM nanocomposites. Polym Plast Technol Eng. 2009;48:313-323. doi:10.1080/03602550802675736.
30. Mahyudin A, Arief S, Abral H, Muldarisnur EM, Artik MP. Mechanical properties and biodegradability of areca nut fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Evergreen. 2020;7:366-372. doi:10.5109/4068618.
31. Pooria P, Churchman GJ, Keeling JL. Characterisation of halloysites for use as nanotubes and microfibre fillers. Appl Clay Sci. 2013;74:47-57. doi:10.1016/j.clay.2012.06.014.
32. Sosiati H, Shofie YA, Nugroho AW. Tensile properties of kenaf/E-glass reinforced hybrid polypropylene composites. Evergreen. 2018;5. doi:10.5109/1936210.
33. Vahedi V, Pasbakhsh P. Impact properties and fracture behaviour of epoxy/modified halloysite nanocomposites. Polym Test. 2014;39:101-114. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.07.017.
34. Nayak S, Kumar M. Mechanical characterization and static analysis of natural fiber-based composite propeller blade. Evergreen. 2023;5:805-812. doi:10.5109/6792832.
35. Maurya NK, Rastogi V, Singh P. Experimental and computational investigation on mechanical properties of reinforced additive manufactured components. Evergreen. 2019;6:207-214. doi:10.5109/2349296.
36. Palanisamy S, Murugesan TM, Palaniappan M, Santulli C, Ayrilmis N. Use of hemp waste for the development of mycelium-grown matrix biocomposites: a concise bibliographic review. BioResources. 2023;18(4):8771-8780. doi:10.15376/biores.18.4.Palanisamy.
37. Ravichandran G, Ramasamy K, Manickaraj K, Kalidas S, Jayamani M, Mausam K, et al. Effect of Sal wood and Babool sawdust fillers on the mechanical properties of snake grass fiber-reinforced polyester composites. BioResources. 2025;20(4):8674-8694. doi:10.15376/biores.20.4.8674-8694.
38. Kar A, Saikia D, Palanisamy S, Pandiarajan N. Effect of fiber loading on the mechanical, morphological, and dynamic mechanical characteristics of Calamus tenuis fiber reinforced epoxy composites. J Vinyl Addit Technol. 2025;31(1):224-240. doi:10.1002/vnl.22167.
39. Pandiarajan P, Baskaran PG, Palanisamy S, Karuppusamy M, Marimuthu K, Rajan A, et al. Enhancing polyester composites with nano Aristida hystrix fibers: mechanical and microstructural insights. BioResources. 2025;20(4):9257-9281. doi:10.15376/biores.20.4.9257-9281.
40. Karuppusamy M, Kalidas S, Palanisamy S, Nataraj K, Nandagopal RK, Natarajan R, et al. Real-time monitoring in polymer composites: Internet of Things integration for enhanced performance and sustainability—a review. BioResources. 2025;20(3):8093-8118. doi:10.15376/biores.20.3.Karuppusamy.
41. Govindarajan PR, Shanmugavel R, Subramanian K, Palanisamy S, Santulli C, Fragassa C. Effect of stacking sequence on mechanical and water absorption characteristics of jute/banana/basalt fabric aluminium fibre laminates with diamond microexpanded mesh. Int J Polym Sci. 2024;2024:3835788. doi:10.1155/2024/3835788.

Ahead of Print Subscription Original Research
Volume 14
04
Received 19/08/2026
Accepted 31/08/2026
Published 03/09/2026
Publication Time 15 Days

Login

My IP

PlumX Metrics