Community Resilience Against Terrorism: Strengthening Social Cohesion to Prevent Radicalization

Year : 2026 | Volume : 03 | Issue : 02 | Page : 13 17
By

Mariyam Shahuneeza Naseer,

  1. Dean of Research, The Maldives National University, Machangolhi, , Maldives

Abstract

This article explores the critical role of social cohesion and community resilience in preventing radicalization and violent extremism. While traditional counterterrorism strategies have primarily relied on military operations, intelligence gathering, and law enforcement interventions, growing evidence suggests that community-based approaches offer more sustainable and long-term solutions. Drawing on global examples, particularly from Denmark and Indonesia, the study highlights how early intervention, cross-sector collaboration, and the active participation of civil society can effectively reduce the appeal of extremist ideologies. It examines the roles of educational institutions, religious organizations, local governments, and community leaders in fostering inclusive environments that discourage radicalization. The paper argues that strengthening social cohesion promotes trust, mutual respect, and a shared sense of belonging, thereby reducing the social isolation, discrimination, and grievances that extremist groups frequently exploit. It further emphasizes the importance of youth empowerment, civic engagement, intercultural dialogue, and equitable access to education, employment, and social services in addressing the underlying drivers of violent extremism. The study also discusses the significance of localized prevention strategies that are tailored to specific cultural and social contexts rather than relying solely on centralized security responses. By integrating prevention, resilience-building, and community participation into national security frameworks, governments can create more adaptive and effective responses to evolving extremist threats. Ultimately, the article concludes that investing in social cohesion and community resilience not only strengthens public safety but also reinforces democratic values, social stability, and sustainable peace. These findings support the adoption of comprehensive, people-centered policies that prioritize prevention alongside conventional security measures to counter violent extremism more effectively.

Keywords: Social cohesion, community resilience, radicalization prevention, violent extremism, counterterrorism strategies.

[This article belongs to Recent Trends in Social Studies ]

How to cite this article: Mariyam Shahuneeza Naseer. Community Resilience Against Terrorism: Strengthening Social Cohesion to Prevent Radicalization. Recent Trends in Social Studies. 2026; 03(02):13-17.
How to cite this URL: Mariyam Shahuneeza Naseer. Community Resilience Against Terrorism: Strengthening Social Cohesion to Prevent Radicalization. Recent Trends in Social Studies. 2026; 03(02):13-17. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rtss/article=2026/view=253763

References

  1. Agastia IG, Perwita AA, Subedi DB. Countering violent extremism through state-society partnerships: a case study of de-radicalisation programmes in Indonesia. Journal of policing, intelligence and counter terrorism. 2020 Jan 2;15(1):23-43.
  2. Zuhri S. The Changing Paradigm of Indonesian Jihadist Movements: From Al-aduww Al-Qarib to Al-aduww Al-Baid. Journal of Indonesian Islam. 2010 Dec 1;4(2):240-67.
  3. Bellander S, Eriksson M, Sundqvist J, Ghazinour M. ” A gap between decision and execution”: an explorative study of the Swedish police’s experiences in implementing the 2015 counter-terrorism strategy. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. 2025,32(2)1-24. DOI:1007/s10610-025-09616-1
  4. Fenger M. Deconstructing social cohesion: Towards an analytical framework for assessing social cohesion policies. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 2012;3(2):39-54.
  5. Bertelsen P. Danish preventive measures and de-radicalization strategies: The Aarhus model. Panorama: Insights into Asian and European Affairs. 2015 Jan;1(241):53.
  6. Douglas S. The Aarhus Model: Countering the global wicked problem of radicalization with local pragmatist collaborations. InPathways to Positive Public Administration 2024 Aug 9 (pp. 320-334). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  7. Garcia I. Mosques’ Vital Role in Preventing Radicalization: Strategies and Impact. Journal={Journal of Living Together}. 2023 Nov 18;8(1):73-81.
  8. Sullivan JP, Bunker RJ. Multilateral counter-insurgency networks. Low Intensity Conflict & Law Enforcement. 2002 Jun 1;11(2-3):353-68.
  9. Hollewell GF, Longpré N. Radicalization in the social media era: understanding the relationship between self-radicalization and the internet. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology. 2022 Jun;66(8):896-913.
  10. Jayasuriya R. The Easter Sunday Attack: Unpacking Islamic Radicalization in Sri Lanka. Essay. In INSSSL Defence Review. 2020:3,39-70.
  11. Andersson Malmros R. From idea to policy: Scandinavian municipalities translating radicalization. Journal for deradicalization. 2019;18:38-73.
  12. Moustakas L. Social cohesion: Definitions, causes and consequences. Encyclopedia. 2023 Aug 29;3(3):1028-37
  13. Prasmarant A, Supriyadi AA. Concept of counterterrorism prevention to support government policy in Indonesia. Linkage. 2024 Aug 31;1(2):100-11.
  14. Soomro SA. Fostering community resilience through the lived experience of terrorist incidents. Management Decision. 2026 May 11;64(4):1296-312.
  15. Sumpter C. Countering violent extremism in Indonesia: priorities, practice and the role of civil society. Journal for Deradicalization. 2017 Jun 24(11):112-47.
  16. Gabriele M. Terrorist Online Radicalization and Its Effects on European Union Counterterrorism Policies. MUNDI. 2026 Apr 23;5(1)72-89.
  17. United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security. 19-006 Indonesia Programme Summary: Achievements [Internet]. New York: United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security; 2024 Aug 7 https://www.un.org/humansecurity/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/19-006-Indonesia-Programme-Summary_Achievements_7-Aug-2024-1.pdf.
  18. Vuković S. Preventive work of the police in the process of deradicalization. InThematic conference proceedings of international significance [Elektronski izvor]/International Scientific Conference” Archibald Reiss Days”, Belgrade, 18-19 November 2020. 2020 (pp. 273-279). Belgrade: University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies.
  19. Wimelius ME, Eriksson M, Kinsman J, Strandh V, Ghazinour M. What is local resilience against radicalization and how can it be promoted? A multidisciplinary literature review. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. 2023 Jul 3;46(7):1108-25.
  20. Wolfowicz M, Hasisi B, Weisburd D. What are the effects of different elements of media on radicalization outcomes? A systematic review. Campbell systematic reviews. 2022 Jun;18(2):e1244.
  21. Wolfowicz M, Weisburd D, Hasisi B. Does context matter? European-specific risk factors for radicalization. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform. 2021 Sep 14;104(3):217-30.
  22. Wyrębek H. National security challenges and threats. Wiedza obronna. 2022 Sep 1;279(2):109-22.
  23. Zych I, Nasaescu E. Is radicalization a family issue? A systematic review of family‐related risk and protective factors, consequences, and interventions against radicalization. Campbell systematic reviews. 2022 Sep;18(3):e1266.
  24. Gray CH. Military AI, sacred violence, and war in the Middle East. Teknokultura: Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. 2024;21(2):166-77.
  25. Berner H, Bertrand R. Social Cohesion. A Basis for the Primary Prevention of Radicalisation in Cities. Journal for Deradicalization. 2023 Dec 29,3, 72-104
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 03
Issue 02
Received 10/03/2026
Accepted 05/07/2026
Published 08/07/2026
Publication Time 120 Days

Login

My IP

PlumX Metrics