This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.
B. Suresh Kumar Reddy,
B. Subba Rao,
PVR Girish Kumar,
S. Gajanana,
B. Ravi Kumar,
- Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MVSR Engineering College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
- Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MCEME CTW Engineering College, Secunderabad, Telangana, India
- Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Geethanjali College of Engineering, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
- Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MVSR Engineering College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
- Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MVSR Engineering College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Abstract
This study presents the fabrication, mechanical characterization, metallurgical analysis, and machinability optimization of Aluminum 6061 reinforced with Silicon Carbide (SiC) metal matrix composites (MMCs) at three weight fractions: 5%, 7.5%, and 10%. Composites were manufactured using the stir casting technique, followed by comprehensive mechanical testing (tensile, hardness, and impact), optical microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Machinability was assessed through turning experiments on a lathe using an L9 Taguchi orthogonal array. Four process parameters viz., cutting speed (414–640 rpm), feed rate (0.061–0.243 mm/rev), depth of cut (0.5–0.9 mm), and back rake angle (10°–20°), were systematically varied to measure resultant cutting forces. Regression models were developed using Minitab to correlate process parameters with cutting force response. Results indicate that Al6061-7.5% SiC exhibits superior mechanical properties: tensile strength of 137.44 N/mm², yield strength of 87.73 N/mm², elongation of 6.18%, and Brinell hardness of 64 BHN. Feed rate was found to be the dominant factor influencing cutting forces, contributing over 61% of the total variance. Finite element simulation of tensile specimens using Autodesk Fusion 360 validated experimental results with maximum stress of 171.2 MPa at 7.5% SiC loading. The developed regression equations facilitate accurate prediction of cutting forces, enabling selection of optimum machining conditions for Al6061-SiC composites.
Keywords: Metal Matrix Composites; Aluminum 6061; Silicon Carbide; Stir Casting; Taguchi Method; Machinability; Cutting Force; Regression Analysis; Finite Element Analysis.
B. Suresh Kumar Reddy, B. Subba Rao, PVR Girish Kumar, S. Gajanana, B. Ravi Kumar. Mechanical Characterization and Machinability Optimization of Stir-Cast Al6061–SiC Metal Matrix Composites. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(03):-.
B. Suresh Kumar Reddy, B. Subba Rao, PVR Girish Kumar, S. Gajanana, B. Ravi Kumar. Mechanical Characterization and Machinability Optimization of Stir-Cast Al6061–SiC Metal Matrix Composites. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(03):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2026/view=245556
References
[1] Sharanya Nair, Nehal Joshi, “Preparation of Al 6061/SiC Metal Matrix Composite (MMC) using stir casting technique,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 1, no. 3, 2015.
[2] Rajesh Agnihotri, Santosh Dagar, “Mechanical properties of Al-SiC metal matrix composites fabricated by stir casting route,” International Journal of Advanced Research, ISSN: 2576-8816, 2017.
[3] Ch. Hima Gireesh, K.G. Durga Prasad, Koona Ramji, “Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of an Al6061 hybrid metal matrix composite,” Journal of Composites Science, vol. 2, 2018.
[4] Revanasidappa M.D., Venkatesh K.C., Naveen C.R., “Mechanical and wear behaviour of Al6061-SiC-Gr hybrid composites,” International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, ISSN: 2231-5381, 2016.
[5] S. Gajanana, B. Suresh Kumar Reddy, A. Krishnaiah, “Analysis of machinability on Al6061 using single point cutting tool,” International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, vol. 8, no. 4, 2017.
[6] S. Gajanana, B. Suresh Kumar Reddy, A. Krishnaiah, “Linear model for turning Al6061 using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO),” International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2017.
[7] Rama Rao S., Padmanabhan G., “Application of Taguchi methods and ANOVA in optimization of process parameters for metal removal rate in electrochemical machining of Al/5%SiC composites,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 192-197, 2012.
[8] N. Senthilkumar, T. Tamizharasan, V. Anandakrishnan, “Experimental investigation and performance analysis of cemented carbide inserts using Taguchi based grey relational analysis,” Measurement, vol. 52, pp. 54-64, 2014.
[9] Kapil Sharma, Dalgobind Mahto, S.S. Sen, “In metal turning, influence of rake angle on cutting tool life,” International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management, vol. 2, no. 8, 2013.
[10] T. Tamizharasan, N. Senthilkumar, “Numerical simulation of effects of machining parameters and tool geometry using DEFORM-3D: Optimization and experimental validation,” World Journal of Modelling and Simulation, vol. 10, 2014.
[11] V.G. Aswathy, Dr. N. Rajeev, “Optimization in turning of Ti-6Al-4V using ANOVA and regression analysis,” International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, vol. 3, no. 9, 2015.
[12] Renjith V.B., Mathew Baby, K.R. Jayadevan, “Influence of process parameters on cutting forces and Taguchi based prediction of T42-CT H.S.S single point cutting tool deflection,” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, vol. 3, no. 7, 2013.
[13] Krishankant, Jatin Taneja, Mohit Bector, Rajesh Kumar, “Application of Taguchi method for optimizing turning process by the effects of machining parameters,” International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 2012.
[14] M. Asad, F. Girardin, T. Mabrouki, J.-F. Rigal, “Dry cutting study of an aluminium alloy (A2024-T351): A numerical and experimental approach,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 53, no. 1, 2013.
[15] W.T. Foster, “Basic Taguchi design of experiments,” National Association of Industrial Technology Conference, Pittsburgh, 2000.
[16] Samruddhi Rao, Pragati Samant, Athira Kadampatta, Reshma Shenoy, “An overview of Taguchi method: Evolution, concept and interdisciplinary applications,” International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2013.
[17] Ranganath M.S., Vipin, R.S. Mishra, “Optimization of surface roughness and material removal rate on conventional dry turning of aluminium (6061),” International Journal of Advance Research and Innovation, vol. 1, pp. 62-71, 2014.
[18] Sijo M.T., K.R. Jayadevan, “Analysis of stir cast aluminium silicon carbide metal matrix composite,” Procedia Technology, International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering Science and Technology (ICETEST), 2015.
[19] P. Subramanya Reddy, “Investigation of mechanical properties of Aluminium 6061-Silicon carbide, Boron carbide metal matrix composite,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, vol. 9, no. 2, 2018.
[20] H. Bil, “Simulation of orthogonal metal cutting by finite element analysis,” Master thesis, The Middle East Technical University, August 2003.
[21] Qingchun Zheng, Cilei Yang, “Simulation and experimentation research on cutting force of turning titanium alloy,” MATEC Web of Conferences, published by EDP Sciences, 2015.
[22] ASM Handbook, Volume 2: Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials, 10th ed., American Society for Metals, 1990.
[23] Schey, A.J., Introduction to Manufacturing Processes, McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1987.

Journal of Polymer & Composites
| Volume | 14 |
| 03 | |
| Received | 28/04/2026 |
| Accepted | 02/05/2026 |
| Published | 30/05/2026 |
| Publication Time | 32 Days |
Login
PlumX Metrics