Instagram Therapists vs. Qualified Mental Health Professionals: How Young Adults Perceive and Navigate Mental Health Advice Online

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2025 | Volume : 02 | Issue : 02 | Page : 26 37
    By

    Lavina Anil Waghalekar,

  • Deeya Bhanushali,

  • Sherin George,

  1. Student, Student, MA Psychology (Counseling), Maniben Nanavati Women’s College, SNDT University, Mumbai, India, Maharashtra, India, Maharashtra, India
  2. Student, Student, MA Psychology (Clinical), Maniben Nanavati Women’s College, SNDT University, Mumbai, India, Maharashtra, India, Maharastra, India
  3. Student, Student, MA Psychology (Counseling), Maniben Nanavati Women’s College, SNDT University, Mumbai, India, Maharashtra, India., Maharastra, India

Abstract

The growing presence of “Instagram Therapists” – individuals who share mental health advice on Instagram without formal qualifications – has raised important questions about the credibility of online mental health information. In contrast, are qualified mental health professionals and licensed practitioners. Existing literature shows a surge in young adults turning to social media for mental health guidance. However, limited research delves into how they perceive and differentiate between advice from Instagram Therapists and qualified professionals. This qualitative exploratory study aims to investigate how young adults perceive and navigate mental health advice provided by Instagram Therapists in comparison to Qualified mental health professionals. It explores the factors that contribute to building trust in Instagram Therapists, the motivations behind seeking help from qualified professionals instead, and the influence of Instagram-based mental health content on young adults’ mental health beliefs, coping strategies, and help-seeking behaviors. 15 young adults aged 18 to 30 years, with no formal background in psychology, participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed thematically to identify recurring patterns and themes. The findings suggest that while Instagram increases access to mental health information, the lack of Context and depth often leads to emotional consequences. Young adults eventually seek solutions beyond online content, transitioning to therapy for more clarity. Perceptions and misconceptions about therapy also emerged. This study highlights the importance of mental health literacy and verification of professional qualifications before relying on online advice. The results have implications suggesting policies and the need for accurate and responsible Mental Health information on online platforms.

Keywords: Content moderation, help-seeking behaviour, instagram therapists, mental health literacy, mental health professionals, misinformation

[This article belongs to International Journal of Behavioral Sciences ]

How to cite this article:
Lavina Anil Waghalekar, Deeya Bhanushali, Sherin George. Instagram Therapists vs. Qualified Mental Health Professionals: How Young Adults Perceive and Navigate Mental Health Advice Online. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2025; 02(02):26-37.
How to cite this URL:
Lavina Anil Waghalekar, Deeya Bhanushali, Sherin George. Instagram Therapists vs. Qualified Mental Health Professionals: How Young Adults Perceive and Navigate Mental Health Advice Online. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2025; 02(02):26-37. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijbsc/article=2025/view=236658


References

  1. Adeane, E., & Stasiak, K. (2024a). “It’s really hard to strike a balance”: The role of digital influencers in shaping youth mental health. Digital Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241288059
  2. Andersson, G., Titov, N., Dear, B. F., Rozental, A., & Carlbring, P. (2019). Internet-delivered psychological treatments: From innovation to implementation. World Psychiatry, 18(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20647
  3. Bellini-Leite SC. (2022). Dual Process Theory: Embodied and Predictive; Symbolic and Classical. Psychol. 13. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805386
  4. Blanco, F. (2017). Cognitive Bias. Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and BehaviorPublisher: SpringerEditors: Jennifer Vonk, Tom Shackelford. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1244-1
  5. Borah, T., Gogoi, S., & Dutta, A. (2020). Cognitive dissonance: its role in decision making. Avance Research Journal Of Social Science, 11(2), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/ARJSS/11.2/69-72
  6. Cavazos-Rehg, P., Krauss, M. J., Sowles, S. J., Connolly, S., Rosas, C., Bharadwaj, M., Grucza, R., & Bierut, L. J. (2017). An analysis of depression, self-harm, and suicidal ideation content on Tumblr. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 38(1), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000409
  7. Chou, W. S., Gaysynsky, A., & Cappella, J. N. (2020). Where we go from here: health misinformation on social media. American Journal of Public Health, 110(S3), S273–S275. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2020.305905
  8. Clement, S., Schauman, O., Graham, T., Maggioni, F., Evans-Lacko, S., Bezborodovs, N., … & Thornicroft, G. (2015). What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Psychological Medicine, 45(1), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714000129
  9. Ehrlinger, J., Readinger, W., & Kim, B. (2016). Decision-Making and Cognitive Biases. 10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00206-8
  10. Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
  11. Garrett, S. M., Hilder, J., Tester, R., Dunlop, A., Gardiner, T., Dowell, T., Brady, S. K., Gilbert, N., Shippam, M., Tanirau, S., Kenny, N., McBride, C., Wilson, J., Rukuwai, E., Aryan, N., & Stubbe, M. (2024). Young people talk about Digital Support for Mental Health: An online survey of 15–30‐year olds in New Zealand. Health Expectations, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70001
  12. Joy, K., & Mabulay, E. P. (2024, May 21). The Virtual Clinic: Social Media’s Influence on Self-Diagnosing and Mental Health Awareness among Filipinos. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380743191_The_Virtual_Clinic_Social_Media%27s_Influence_on_Self-Diagnosing_and_Mental_Health_Awareness_among_Filipinos
  13. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
  14.  Marchant, A., Hawton, K., Stewart, A., Montgomery, P., Singh, S., Pirkis, J., & John, A. (2017). A systematic review of the relationship between internet use, self-harm, and suicidal behavior in young people: The good, the bad, and the unknown. PLOS ONE, 12(8), e0181722. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181722
  15. Adeane, E., & Stasiak, K. (2024a). “It’s really hard to strike a balance”: The role of digital influencers in shaping youth mental health. Digital Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241288059
  16. Andersson, G., Titov, N., Dear, B. F., Rozental, A., & Carlbring, P. (2019). Internet-delivered psychological treatments: From innovation to implementation. World Psychiatry, 18(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20647
  17. Bellini-Leite SC. (2022). Dual Process Theory: Embodied and Predictive; Symbolic and Classical. Psychol. 13. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805386
  18. Blanco, F. (2017). Cognitive Bias. Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and BehaviorPublisher: SpringerEditors: Jennifer Vonk, Tom Shackelford. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1244-1
  19. Borah, T., Gogoi, S., & Dutta, A. (2020). Cognitive dissonance: its role in decision making. Avance Research Journal Of Social Science, 11(2), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/ARJSS/11.2/69-72
  20. Cavazos-Rehg, P., Krauss, M. J., Sowles, S. J., Connolly, S., Rosas, C., Bharadwaj, M., Grucza, R., & Bierut, L. J. (2017). An analysis of depression, self-harm, and suicidal ideation content on Tumblr. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 38(1), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000409
  21. Chou, W. S., Gaysynsky, A., & Cappella, J. N. (2020). Where we go from here: health misinformation on social media. American Journal of Public Health, 110(S3), S273–S275. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2020.305905
  22. Clement, S., Schauman, O., Graham, T., Maggioni, F., Evans-Lacko, S., Bezborodovs, N., … & Thornicroft, G. (2015). What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Psychological Medicine, 45(1), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714000129
  23. Ehrlinger, J., Readinger, W., & Kim, B. (2016). Decision-Making and Cognitive Biases. 10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00206-8
  24. Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
  25. Garrett, S. M., Hilder, J., Tester, R., Dunlop, A., Gardiner, T., Dowell, T., Brady, S. K., Gilbert, N., Shippam, M., Tanirau, S., Kenny, N., McBride, C., Wilson, J., Rukuwai, E., Aryan, N., & Stubbe, M. (2024). Young people talk about Digital Support for Mental Health: An online survey of 15–30‐year olds in New Zealand. Health Expectations, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70001
  26. Joy, K., & Mabulay, E. P. (2024, May 21). The Virtual Clinic: Social Media’s Influence on Self-Diagnosing and Mental Health Awareness among Filipinos. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380743191_The_Virtual_Clinic_Social_Media%27s_Influence_on_Self-Diagnosing_and_Mental_Health_Awareness_among_Filipinos
  27. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 02
Issue 02
Received 07/05/2025
Accepted 28/06/2025
Published 26/10/2025
Publication Time 172 Days
97

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics