Limits to Knowledge-sharing By Computers

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2025 | Volume : 15 | Issue : 02 | Page : –
    By

    V. Basil Hans,

  1. Research Professor, Department of Management & Commerce, Srinivas University, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India

Abstract

document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_187342’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has significantly enhanced the capabilities of computers in processing, analyzing, and disseminating knowledge. However, despite these advancements, there are inherent limits to the extent that knowledge-sharing can be fully realized through computer systems. This article explores the various barriers that hinder the effective sharing and transfer of knowledge through machines, including technological limitations, ethical concerns, and the  complexities of human cognition. It examines the challenges posed by data interpretation, context understanding, and the ability of computers to replicate human intuition, creativity, and subjective experience. Furthermore, the paper highlights the importance of human- computer collaboration and discusses potential future directions for bridging the gap between human knowledge and machine capabilities. Ultimately, while computers play a pivotal role in enhancing knowledge-sharing, their limitations underscore the need for complementary human involvement in decision-making and problem-solving processes.

Keywords: Digital technology, volume of information Knowledge-sharing in the digital age, computer-mediated communication, sensitive personal data

[This article belongs to Current Trends in Information Technology ]

How to cite this article:
V. Basil Hans. Limits to Knowledge-sharing By Computers. Current Trends in Information Technology. 2025; 15(02):-.
How to cite this URL:
V. Basil Hans. Limits to Knowledge-sharing By Computers. Current Trends in Information Technology. 2025; 15(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ctit/article=2025/view=0



document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_187342’);});Edit

References

  1. Ajie I. Issues and prospects of knowledge sharing in academic libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice. 2019 Feb 1:1-7.
  2. Al-Ahmari S, Renaud K, Omoronyia I. A Systematic Review of Information Security Knowledge-Sharing Research. HAISA. 2018 Sep 9:101-10.
  3. Chatterjee S. Managing constraints and removing obstacles to knowledge management. Andhra University, 2014 August 6.
  4. Mahami-Oskouei M, Nemati-Anaraki L, Panahi S, Asadzandi S. Factors influencing knowledge sharing between scientific specialists in knowledge networks and communities of practice: a systematic literature review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2024 Apr 1;13(1):136.
  5. Lee A, Lim TM. Strategies to improve knowledge sharing in trading construction organization. Information Technology in Industry. 2017;5.
  6. Lee WW, Alkureishi ML, Isaacson JH, Mayer M, Frankel RM, London DA, Wroblewski KE, Arora VM. Impact of a brief faculty training to improve patient- centered communication while using electronic health records. Patient Education and Counseling. 2018 Dec 1;101(12):2156-61.
  7. Madison MJ. Social Software, Groups, and Governance. Mich. St. L. Rev.. 2006:153.
  8. Lavoie E, Hendren L. Personal volunteer computing. InProceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers 2019 Apr 30 (pp. 240-246).
  9. Jaswal BA. Impact of digital technology on library resource sharing: revisiting LABELNET in the digital age. Pakistan Journal of Library & Information Science. 2006;2006(7):87-104.
  10. Ito M, Horst HA, Bittanti M, Boyd D, Herr-Stephenson B, Lange PG, Pascoe CJ, Robinson L. Living and Learningwith New Media: Summary of Findings from theDigital Youth Project. Sociology. 2008 Nov 1.
  11. Jamal A, Coughlan J, Kamal M. Mining social network data for personalisation and privacy concerns: a case study of Facebook’s Beacon. International Journal of Business Information Systems. 2013 Jan 1;13(2):173-98.
  12. Kaminski ME, Rueben M, Smart WD, Grimm CM. Averting robot eyes. Md. L. Rev.. 2016;76:983.
  13. Pedro N, Soares F, Matos JF, Santos M. The use of learning management platforms in school context-a national study. The use of learning management platforms in school context-a national study. 2008.
  14. Ebrahim NA, Ahmed S, Taha Z. SMEs; Virtual research and development (R&D) teams and new product development: A literature review. International Journal of the Physical Sciences. 2010;5(7):916-30.
  15. Adam A. Delegating and distributing morality: Can we inscribe privacy protection in a machine?. Ethics and Information Technology. 2005 Dec;7:233-42.
  16. Kim H, Giacomin J, Macredie R. A qualitative study of stakeholders’ perspectives on the social network service environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2014 Dec 2;30(12):965-76.
  17. Di Meglio A, Purcell A, Gaillard M. CERN openlab whitepaper on future IT challenges in scientific research. Publication prepared by CERN openlab on behalf of the contributors;2014. https://cds.cern.ch/record/1704394
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 15
Issue 02
Received 03/03/2025
Accepted 22/04/2025
Published 03/05/2025
Publication Time 61 Days
120

[first_name] [last_name]

My IP

PlumX Metrics