SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGY AND DIGITAL LIBRARY

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2025 | Volume : 15 | Issue : 02 | Page : –
    By

    Sanjay M. Salwe,

  1. Associate Professor and Head, Shri Ramrao Sarnaik College of Social Work, Washim, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_187172’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

In the recent years more and more information has been made available on the Web. High quality information is often stored in dedicated digital libraries, which are on their way to become expanding islands of well organized information. However, managing this information still poses challenges. The Semantic Web provides technologies that help to meet these challenges. the SEKT(semantically enable knowledge technologies) project is to develop and exploit the semantic technologies that will underlie the next generation of knowledge management systems. A key element of the project is to evaluate and assess the impact of semantic web technology in case study settings. The overall aim of the case study, how digital libraries benefit from the Semantic Web.

Keywords: World-Wide Web, Semantic Web, layers, presentation, information

[This article belongs to Current Trends in Information Technology ]

How to cite this article:
Sanjay M. Salwe. SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGY AND DIGITAL LIBRARY. Current Trends in Information Technology. 2025; 15(02):-.
How to cite this URL:
Sanjay M. Salwe. SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGY AND DIGITAL LIBRARY. Current Trends in Information Technology. 2025; 15(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ctit/article=2025/view=0



document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_187172’);});Edit

References

  1. C. Fellbaum. Wordnet an electronic lexical database, 1998. The European Library Portal,  [http://www.theeuropeanlibrary.org/portal/index.html] OAIster, [http://www.oaister.org/]
  2. Nucci, M., David, S., Hahn, D., Barbera, M., Talia: A Framework for Philosophy Scholars, in proceedings of Semantic Web Applications and Perspective, Bari, Italy, 2007.
  3. Semantic Web Technologies, Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems, John Wiley &  Sons, 2006.
  4. DublinCore Initiative, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.Dublin Core Metadata Element  Set, Version 1.1: Reference Description.
  5. M. Frauenfelder. A smarter web. Technology review, Ontoprise  http://www.ontoprise.de/documents/A Smarter Web.pdf, November 2001.
  6. J. Frew, M. Freeston, N. Freitas, L. L. Hill, G. Janee, K. Lovette, R. Nideffer, T. R. Smith, and  Q. Zheng. The alexandria digital library architecture. In Proceedings of the Second European  Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pages 61 73. Springer Verlag, 1998.
  7. D. A. Fritz, , and R. Fritz. MARC21 for Everyone: a practical guide. The American Library  Association, 2003.
  8. G. Koutrika and Y. Ioannidis. Rule-based query personalization in digital libraries.  International Jurnal on Digital Libraries, (4):60–63, July 2004.
  9. R. Kruk. Advanced search and browsing in digital libraries. In ISWC, 2004.
  10. D. I. Moldovan and R. Mihalcea. Using wordnet and lexical operators to improve internet  searches. IEEE Internet Computing, 4(1):34–43, January 2000.
  11. M. Okraszewski and H. Krawczyk. Semantic web services in l2l. In T. Klopotek, Wierzchon,  editor, Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining, pages 349–357. Polish Academy of  Science, Springer, May 2004. Proceedings of the International IIS: IIPWM’04 Conference held  in Zakopane, Poland, May 17-20, 2004.
  12. I O’Murchu, J. Breslin, and S. Decker. Community portal survey. DERI Research Report – Semantic Web Portal Project D9, DERI.Galway, April 2004.
  13. C. Bizer and T. Gauss. Rdf book mashup – serving rdf descriptions of your books,Nov. 2006.
  14. J. Breslin, A. Harth, U. Bojars, and S. Decker. Towards semantically-interlinked online  communities. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC ’05),  Heraklion, Greece, volume 3532, pages 500–514, June 2005.
  15. M. J. Cafarella and O. Etzioni. A search engine for natural language applications. In WWW  ’05: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 442–452, New  York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
  16. S. Kruk, M. Synak, and K. Zimmermann. Marcont initiative – mediation services for digital  libraries. In ECDL, 2005.
  17. S. R. Kruk. FOAF-Realm – control your friends’ access to resources. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/events/foaf-galway/papers/fp/foaf realm/.
  18. S. R. Kruk, S. Decker, A. Gzella, S. Grzonkowski, and B. McDaniel. Social semantic collaborative filtering for digital libraries. Journal of Digital Information, Special Issue on  Personalization, 2006.
  19. S. R. Kruk, S. Decker, and L. Zieborak. JeromeDL – Adding Semantic Web Technologies to Digital Libraries. In Proceedings of DEXA’2005 Conference, 2005.
  20. S. R. Kruk, S. Grzonkowski, A. Gzella, T. Woroniecki, and H.-C. Choi. D-FOAF: Distributed Identity Management with Access Rights Delegation. In Proceedings to  ASWC’2006, 2006.
  21. S. R. Kruk, K. Samp, C. O’Nuallain, B. Davis, B. McDaniel, and S. Grzonkowski. Search  interface based on natural language query templates. In Proceedings of the poster session of  IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet 2006, 2006.
  22. S. R. Kruk, M. Synak, and K. Zimmermann. MarcOnt – Integration Ontology for Bibliographic Description Formats. In Proceedings of DC’2005, 2005.

Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 15
Issue 02
Received 08/04/2025
Accepted 02/05/2025
Published 02/05/2025
Publication Time 24 Days

[first_name] [last_name]

My IP

PlumX Metrics