Perception of Islamic Scholars towards Polio Vaccination in Northern Nigeria

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2024 | Volume : | : | Page : –
By
vector

Suleiman Mohammed Saeed,

  1. Senior Lecturer, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Management and Social Sciences, Federal University, Gashua,, Yobe State, Nigeria

Abstract document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_128108’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

Poliomyelitis, commonly known as polio, is a highly infectious disease that can lead to permanent paralysis and, in severe cases, death. Despite global efforts to eradicate polio through vaccination, Nigeria, particularly its Northern region, has faced significant challenges in reaching full immunization coverage. Resistance to polio vaccination is often rooted in cultural and religious concerns, with Islamic scholars playing a significant role in shaping public perception and acceptance of health interventions. This study investigates the attitudes, beliefs, and influence of Islamic scholars towards polio vaccination in Northern Nigeria, where vaccine hesitancy has presented an obstacle to public health initiatives. Using a qualitative research approach, we conducted in-depth interviews with a representative sample of Islamic scholars across several states in Northern Nigeria. The findings reveal that Islamic scholars’ perceptions of polio vaccination are influenced by a complex interplay of religious beliefs, historical mistrust of international health agencies, and the spread of misinformation within communities. While some scholars view vaccination as a religious duty to protect health, others express concerns that the vaccine may conflict with religious or cultural values. Additionally, rumours and conspiracy theories, such as beliefs that the vaccine is a means of population control, have contributed to skepticism among scholars and their communities. This research highlights the pivotal role that Islamic scholars play as community leaders and influencers in Northern Nigeria, particularly in rural and underserved areas. By understanding these scholars’ perspectives, health authorities can tailor communication strategies and collaborate with religious leaders to improve vaccine acceptance. Our findings suggest that culturally sensitive engagement with Islamic scholars, combined with efforts to address misinformation, and could be instrumental in reducing resistance to polio vaccination. The study offers practical recommendations for health policy makers, emphasizing the need for community-based approaches that respect religious beliefs while promoting public health objectives. This research contributes to the broader discourse on health interventions in religious communities and has implications for other regions facing similar challenges with vaccine hesitancy.

Keywords: Islamic Scholars, Northern Nigeria, Perception, Polio, Vaccination.

How to cite this article:
Suleiman Mohammed Saeed. Perception of Islamic Scholars towards Polio Vaccination in Northern Nigeria. International Journal of Vaccines. 2024; ():-.
How to cite this URL:
Suleiman Mohammed Saeed. Perception of Islamic Scholars towards Polio Vaccination in Northern Nigeria. International Journal of Vaccines. 2024; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijv/article=2024/view=0

Full Text PDF

Full Text PDF

References
document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_128108’);});Edit

  1. Baum MA, Lake C. The impact of religious affiliation on vaccine hesitancy and public health outcomes. Global Public Health Journal. 2014;6(3):223–35.
  2. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  3. Closser S, Rosenthal A, Maes K, Justice J, Cox K, Omidian P, Koon A. The impact of polio eradication campaigns on routine immunization and primary health care: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2014;210(S1):S504–S13. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu447.
  4. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Sage; 2018.
  5. Ghinai I, Willott C, Dadari I, Larson HJ. Listening to the rumours: What the Northern Nigeria polio vaccine boycott can tell us ten years on. Global Public Health. 2013;8(10):1138–50. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2013.859720.
  6. Global Polio Eradication Initiative. Polio Eradication: Progress and Challenges. GPEI Report. 2021. Available from: https://polioeradication.org
  7. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage; 1994.
  8. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903.
  9. Jegede AS. What led to the Nigerian boycott of the polio vaccination campaign? PLoS Medicine. 2007;4(3):e73. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040073.
  10. Kaufman J, Ryan R, Walsh L, Horey D, Leask J, Robinson P, Hill S. Face-to-face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017;1(1):CD010038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010038.pub2.
  11. Kazeem O. Polio eradication in Nigeria: Lessons from Islamic leaders’ engagement. Journal of Public Health in Africa. 2014;5(1):39–42. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2014.39.
  12. Khan M, Shaikh BT. Role of mosque in health promotion: A study of urban community in Pakistan. Journal of Religion and Health. 2013;52(2):569–78. doi: 10.1007/s10943-011-9493-0.
  13. Larson HJ, Ghinai I, Willott C, Dadari I. The path of least resistance: Early lessons on increasing vaccination coverage from polio eradication efforts in Nigeria. Health Policy and Planning. 2015;30(9):1131–8. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu116.
  14. MacDonald NE. Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine. 2015;33(34):4161–4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036.
  15. Mohammed A, Tukur R. Religious leaders’ perspectives on immunization in Nigeria: Insights from Islamic clerics. African Health Sciences. 2019;19(2):2052–60. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i2.15.
  16. Rosenstock IM. Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Education Monographs. 1974;2(4):328–35. doi: 10.1177/109019817400200403.
  17. Usman S, Nuhu A. Attitudes of Islamic scholars toward vaccination programs in Northern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Public Health. 2018;29(3):125–33.
  18. World Health Organization. Poliomyelitis Fact Sheet. WHO. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/poliomyelitis
  19. Yahya M. Polio vaccines – “No thank you!” Barriers to polio eradication in Northern Nigeria. African Affairs. 2006;106(423):185–204. doi: 10.1093/afraf/adl008.
  20. Yahya M. Polio vaccine refusal in Northern Nigeria: A critical sociological analysis of “public understanding of science.” Inaugural-Dissertation, University of Freiburg. 2007. Available from: https://www.zhb.uni-luebeck.de
Ahead of Print Subscription Original Research
Volume
Received 27/11/2024
Accepted 14/12/2024
Published 18/12/2024
186