High-speed Data Converter Architectures: Latched Comparator Design & Performance Comparison

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n

n

n

n

Open Access

nn

n

n[/if 992]n

n

Year : June 13, 2024 at 2:04 pm | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume :14 [else] Volume :14[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : 01 | Page : 23-32

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

[foreach 286]n

n

n

Banoth Krishna, Sandeep Singh Gill, Amod Kumar

n

    n t

  • n

n

n[/foreach]

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Research Scholar, Professor, Professor and Head Department of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research, Chandigarh, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research, Chandigarh, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research, Chandigarh Punjab, Punjab, Punjab India, India, India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n

n

Abstract

nThis paper focuses on the design and optimization of latch comparators for high-speed data converter applications. The performance of different comparator architectures is compared in terms of speed, power consumption, and noise performance. The proposed latch comparator architecture uses a preamplifier to boost gain and sensitivity, and a latch to store the output signal. The latch comparator design is optimized for low power consumption and high speed, and is implemented using 180 nm CMOS technology. The circuits are simulated using cadence virtuoso simulators with a 1.8 V supply DC voltage and a clock frequency of approximately 500 MHz. The responses of the circuits are analyzed and plotted, and the static and dynamic characteristics of different types of comparators are compared, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. Simulation results show that the proposed latch comparator architecture has better performance compared to other comparator architectures, with lower power consumption and higher speed. The paper also discusses the trade-offs between power consumption, speed, and noise performance, and provides guidelines for selecting the appropriate comparator architecture for high-speed data converter applications.

n

n

n

Keywords: High speed comparator, Latch comparator, Double tail comparator, High speed ADC

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of VLSI Design Tools and Technology(jovdtt)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of VLSI Design Tools and Technology(jovdtt)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Banoth Krishna, Sandeep Singh Gill, Amod Kumar. High-speed Data Converter Architectures: Latched Comparator Design & Performance Comparison. Journal of VLSI Design Tools and Technology. May 30, 2024; 14(01):23-32.

n

How to cite this URL: Banoth Krishna, Sandeep Singh Gill, Amod Kumar. High-speed Data Converter Architectures: Latched Comparator Design & Performance Comparison. Journal of VLSI Design Tools and Technology. May 30, 2024; 14(01):23-32. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jovdtt/article=May 30, 2024/view=0

nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n[if 992 not_equal=”Open Access”]

[/if 992]n[if 992 not_equal=”Open Access”] n


nn[/if 992]nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

n

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  1. Jeon, H., & Kim, Y. B. (2012). A novel low-power, low-offset, and high-speed CMOS dynamic latched comparator. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 70(3), 337-346.
  2. Dhal, L. M., & Pradhan, A. (2013). Study and Analysis of different types of comparator (Doctoral dissertation).
  3. Babayan-Mashhadi, S., & Lotfi, R. (2013). Analysis and design of a low-voltage low-power double-tail comparator. IEEE transactions on very large-scale integration (vlsi) systems, 22(2), 343-352.
  4. Yaqubi, E., & Zahiri, S. H. (2017). Optimum design of a double-tail latch comparator on power, speed, offset and size. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 90(2), 309-319.
  5. Purushothaman, A., & Parikh, C. D. (2015). A new delay model and geometric programming-based design automation for latched comparators. Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, 34(9), 2749-2764.
  6. Bahmanyar, P., Maymandi-Nejad, M., Hosseini-Khayat, S., & Berekovic, M. (2016). Design and analysis of an ultra-low-power double-tail latched comparator for biomedical applications. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 86(2), 159-169.
  7. Jain, R., Dubey, A. K., Varshney, V., & Nagaria, R. K. (2017, October). Design of low-power high-speed double-tail dynamic CMOS comparator using novel latch structure. In 2017 4th IEEE Uttar Pradesh section international conference on electrical, computer and electronics (UPCON) (pp. 217-222). IEEE.
  8. Dubey, A. K., & Nagaria, R. K. (2018). Optimization for offset and kickback-noise in novel CMOS double-tail dynamic comparator: A low-power, high-speed design approach using bulk-driven load. Microelectronics Journal, 78, 1-10.
  9. Varshney, V., & Nagaria, R. K. (2020). Design and analysis of ultra-high-speed low-power double tail dynamic comparator using charge sharing scheme. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 116, 153068.
  10. Dubey, A. K., & Nagaria, R. K. (2019). Low-power high-speed CMOS double tail dynamic comparator using self-biased amplification stage and novel latch stage. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 101(2), 307-317.

 

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””]Regular Issue[else]Published[/if 424] Subscription Original Research

n

n

n

n

n

Journal of VLSI Design Tools and Technology

n

[if 344 not_equal=””]ISSN: 2249-474X[/if 344]

n

n

n

n

n

[if 2146 equals=”Yes”][/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”][/if 2146]n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 1748 not_equal=””]

[else]

[/if 1748]n

n

n

Volume 14
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] 01
Received May 16, 2024
Accepted May 23, 2024
Published May 30, 2024

n

n

n

n

n

n function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n”}]