Comparative Performance Study of Mechanical and Durability Performance Evaluation of Interlocking Concrete Pavement Blocks

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2026 | Volume : 13 | Issue : 01 | Page : 25 31
    By

    Ravi Raushan,

  • Prateek Sharma,

Abstract

Interlocking concrete pavement blocks (ICPBs) have emerged as a durable, modular, and sustainable alternative to traditional pavement systems. Their performance depends heavily on the mechanical characteristics of the concrete mix, block geometry, compaction technique, and curing conditions. This review compiles and analyzes research findings related to the strength, durability, structural behavior, and long-term performance of ICPBs produced using traditional and modified concrete mixes. Key parameters evaluated include compressive strength, split tensile strength, abrasion resistance, water absorption, flexural performance, and interlocking efficiency. The review also includes comparative tables, graphs, and insights into the influence of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), recycled aggregates, and surface treatments on pavement block performance. Findings reveal that optimized mix design and proper manufacturing techniques significantly enhance the mechanical and durability properties of ICPBs, enabling their use in heavy-duty applications and sustainable urban infrastructure.

Keywords: Interlocking concrete blocks, paver blocks, durability, mechanical performance, pavement engineering

[This article belongs to Trends in Transport Engineering and Applications ]

How to cite this article:
Ravi Raushan, Prateek Sharma. Comparative Performance Study of Mechanical and Durability Performance Evaluation of Interlocking Concrete Pavement Blocks. Trends in Transport Engineering and Applications. 2026; 13(01):25-31.
How to cite this URL:
Ravi Raushan, Prateek Sharma. Comparative Performance Study of Mechanical and Durability Performance Evaluation of Interlocking Concrete Pavement Blocks. Trends in Transport Engineering and Applications. 2026; 13(01):25-31. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ttea/article=2026/view=241806


References

  1. Tergou A, Boukendakdji O, Kenai S. Performance evaluation of concrete paving blocks incorporating recycled aggregates. Construction and Building Materials. 2019;210:515–526.
  2. Sharma R, Kumar P. Effect of fly ash incorporation on mechanical and durability properties of interlocking concrete paving blocks. Construction and Building Materials. 2021;287:123012.
  3. da Silva RV, de Brito J, Dhir RK. Properties and composition of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste suitable for pavement blocks. Construction and Building Materials. 2018;165:554–563.
  4. Li Z, Xu J. Mechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced concrete paver blocks under static and dynamic loading. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. 2020;21(9):1112–1124.
  5. Patel A, Shah N, Patel D. Utilization of ceramic waste as partial replacement of aggregate in concrete paver blocks. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;330:129824.
  6. Khalid H, Rahman M, Hasan M. Performance of hybrid recycled aggregate concrete pavements under traffic loading. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2023;18:e01892.
  7. Shackel B. Performance assessment of interlocking concrete block pavements. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Transport. 2010;163(2):89–101.
  8. Yousuf M, Hasan M, Karim MR. Strength, durability and performance evaluation of concrete paving blocks. Construction and Building Materials. 2014;61:34–43.
  9. Smith DR. Interlocking concrete pavement design practices. ACI Materials Journal. 2011;108(3):256–264.
  10. Shah A, Kutas M. Mechanical properties of concrete paver blocks using recycled aggregates. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. 2019;20(10):1254–1265.
  11. Tanyildizi H. Impact and abrasion resistance of concrete paver blocks incorporating waste materials. Construction and Building Materials. 2017;153:898–907.
  12. Limbachiya M, Marrocchino E, Koulouris A. Chemical–mineralogical characterization of coarse recycled concrete aggregate. Engineering Structures. 2007;29(9):2293–2300.
  13. Debieb F, Courard L, Kenai S, Degeimbre R. Roller compacted concrete pavers incorporating ceramic waste aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2010;32(7):491–498.
  14. Alqahtani FK, Hossain KMA, Lachemi M. Paver blocks produced with recycled concrete aggregate and supplementary cementitious materials. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2020;32(5):04020065.
  15. Torres A, Hu J. Sustainable concrete paver blocks using waste glass and ceramic materials. Construction and Building Materials. 2017;144:76–84.
  16. Kumar R, Singh B, Gupta R. Durability performance of interlocking concrete blocks incorporating recycled concrete aggregate. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2022;16:e00925.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 13
Issue 01
Received 02/02/2026
Accepted 04/02/2026
Published 09/02/2026
Publication Time 7 Days
2

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics