Decoding ‘I Do’s and ‘I Don’ts’: Exploring the Surge in Indian Divorce Rates

Year : 2024 | Volume :01 | Issue : 01 | Page : 17-24
By

Charu

  1. Student Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida Uttar Pradesh India

Abstract

The research explores the evolving dynamics of marriage and divorce in India, highlighting the rise in divorce rates due to increased stress, lack of bonds, and female independence. The study argues that women’s financial self-sufficiency has led to a decrease in their willingness to tolerate unsatisfactory or abusive marriages. The research also emphasizes the influence of urbanization, Westernization, and changing attitudes toward marriage as factors contributing to the increase in divorce rates. The study underscores the need for societal changes that support women’s financial independence and their right to choose their marital paths, free from societal pressure and financial dependence. The research also highlights the importance of addressing the root causes of unsatisfactory marriages, such as societal expectations and gender roles, to create a more equitable and fulfilling marital landscape for all individuals. The study emphasizes the urgent need for societal reforms that bolster women’s financial independence and uphold their right to choose marital paths devoid of societal pressure and financial constraints. Additionally, it underscores the importance of confronting root causes of marital dissatisfaction, such as entrenched societal expectations and rigid gender roles, to cultivate an equitable and fulfilling marital landscape for all individuals. Furthermore, it investigates how education and exposure influence perceptions of marriage and divorce, especially among younger cohorts. It advocates for increased understanding and tolerance of varied marital paths to create an inclusive and nurturing atmosphere where people can seek fulfilling relationships according to their preferences. Additionally, it suggests implementing tailored support programs to equip couples with the tools and assistance needed to overcome obstacles and cultivate strong partnerships. Ultimately, the study envisions a future where marriages prioritize mutual respect, parity, and individual satisfaction over societal expectations or financial imperatives.

Keywords: Marriage, Divorce, Individualism, Traditional Norms and Westernization

[This article belongs to Recent Trends in Social Studies(rtss)]

How to cite this article: Charu. Decoding ‘I Do’s and ‘I Don’ts’: Exploring the Surge in Indian Divorce Rates. Recent Trends in Social Studies. 2024; 01(01):17-24.
How to cite this URL: Charu. Decoding ‘I Do’s and ‘I Don’ts’: Exploring the Surge in Indian Divorce Rates. Recent Trends in Social Studies. 2024; 01(01):17-24. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rtss/article=2024/view=145372


References

  1. Dommaraju P. Divorce and separation in India. Population and Development Review. 2016 Jun 1:195-223.
  2. Daly M, Wilson MI. The evolutionary psychology of marriage and divorce. The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. 2000:91-110.
  3. Anand R, Aggarwal V. Marriage system and divorce: Changing pattern in India. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences. 2018;8(11):914-26.
  4. Sprigg P. Understanding Windsor: What the Supreme Court Ruling on the Defense of Marriage Act Did—and Did Not—Say.
  5. Viefhues-Bailey LH. Between a man and a woman? Why conservatives oppose same-sex marriage. Columbia University Press; 2010 Dec 31.
  6. Bhattacharyya KK. The sacred relationship between marriage, spirituality and healthy aging in Hinduism. Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging. 2020 Apr 2;32(2):135-48.
  7. Vincent P, D’Mello L. Changing trends of divorce in India: Issues & concerns. International Journal of Management, Technology and Social Sciences (IJMTS). 2018 Dec 12;3(2):151-7.
  8. Bohm D. A new theory of the relationship of mind and matter. Philosophical psychology. 1990 Jan 1;3(2-3):271-86.
  9. Allendorf K. Women’s agency and the quality of family relationships in India. Population  research and policy review. 2012 Apr;31:187-206.
  10. Niranjan S, Nair S, Roy TK. A socio-demographic analysis of the size and structure of the family in India. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 2005 Dec 1;36(4):623-52.
  11. Bergvall M. Development of Divorce in Sweden 1910-2000: A county-level analysis of divorce and economic determinants.
  12. Cartwright S, Cooper CL. The role of culture compatibility in successful organizational marriage. Academy of Management Perspectives. 1993 May 1;7(2):57-70.
  13. Hendrick SS, Hendrick C. Linking romantic love with sex: Development of the perceptions of love and sex scale. Journal of social and Personal Relationships. 2002 Jun;19(3):361-78.
  14. Singh A. The psychology of love: Exploring the gender differences in unmarried and married couples. Available at SSRN 2325910. 2012 May 1.
  15. Basu J, Ray R. The Three Faces of Love: College Students’ Perception of the Spouse, Date and Cross-sex Friend. Psychology and Developing Societies. 2000 Sep;12(2):177-213.
  16. Noor SA, Djaba T, Enomoto CE. The role of social networking websites: Do they connect people through marriage or are they responsible for divorce. Journal of International Social Issues. 2016;4(1):40-9.
  17. Arikewuyo AO, Eluwole KK, Dambo TH, Abdulbaqi SS. Do low self-esteem, relationship dissatisfaction and relationship insecurity exacerbate the intention to break up in romantic relationships?. Current Psychology. 2022 Nov;41(11):7695-706.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 01
Issue 01
Received April 12, 2024
Accepted May 1, 2024
Published May 7, 2024
Views: 17