Adapting Traditional Land Use Planning with Smart City Solutions – Case of New Delhi

Year : 2025 | Volume : 15 | Issue : 03 | Page : 24 47
    By

    Mansi Singh,

  • Sanjay Kumar,

  • Akshey,

Abstract

*Author for Correspondence

Mansi Singh

Email: [email protected]

 

1PhD, Department of Planning and Architecture, School of Planning and Architecture (SPA), New Delhi, Delhi, India

2Senior Town Planner, Haryana’s Town & Country Planning Department, Haryana, India

3Environmental Advisor, Environmental Advisor at Green Circle, Gujarat, Vadodara, India

 

Received Date: August 11, 2025

Accepted Date: September 04, 2025

Published Date: September 04, 2025

 
Citation: Mansi Singh, Ar. Sanjay Kumar, Akshay. Adapting Traditional Land Use Planning with Smart City Solutions – Case of New Delhi. Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology. 2025; 15(3): 24–47p.

This research paper explores how traditional land use planning can be effectively blended with Smart City solutions to shape the future of New Delhi. As the city grapples with rapid urbanization, rising traffic congestion, and severe environmental pressures, the need for adaptive and sustainable urban development has become more urgent than ever. Although New Delhi’s planning framework—rooted in Master Plans and zoning regulations—has evolved over the decades, it still struggles to address the complexities of modern urban challenges.The study emphasizes the growing importance of adaptive governance and technology-driven planning in Indian cities. Smart City tools such as IoT, AI, GIS, and data-driven governance offer powerful ways to complement traditional methods. These technologies can enhance decision-making, streamline urban services, and significantly improve overall quality of life. Drawing on global models such as Barcelona’s Urban Platform and Singapore’s integrated land-use and transport planning, the paper proposes a hybrid planning approach for New Delhi—one that respects heritage, supports environmental sustainability, and embraces technological innovation.India’s urban growth makes this integration even more essential. With 68% of the world’s population expected to live in cities by 2050, and New Delhi projected to increase from 31 million (2020) to 36 million (2030), efficient land use and resilient infrastructure are indispensable. Yet, planning efforts under the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) often remain reactive, resulting in service gaps, unplanned growth, and escalating environmental degradation.Smart City interventions offer transformative solutions. GIS-based dynamic zoning, real-time mobility analytics, and IoT-enabled infrastructure can create a more responsive urban ecosystem. Notably, New Delhi’s adoption of smart traffic management has already reduced congestion by nearly 12% in major corridors—demonstrating the potential for broader implementation. Aligning Smart City strategies with the Master Plan for Delhi 2041 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 11) can further advance sustainability, inclusivity, and economic resilience. The paper underscores the need for stakeholder collaboration, policy reforms, and capacity building to ensure successful integration.Ultimately, adapting traditional land use planning with Smart City solutions is not merely a necessity—it is a transformative opportunity to reimagine New Delhi as a resilient, inclusive, and future-ready city for the 21st century.

Keywords: Smart city solutions, traditional land use planning, participatory planning, heritage conservation, smart infrastructure, climate resilience, sustainable urban development, mixed-use development

[This article belongs to Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology ]

How to cite this article:
Mansi Singh, Sanjay Kumar, Akshey. Adapting Traditional Land Use Planning with Smart City Solutions – Case of New Delhi. Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology. 2025; 15(03):24-47.
How to cite this URL:
Mansi Singh, Sanjay Kumar, Akshey. Adapting Traditional Land Use Planning with Smart City Solutions – Case of New Delhi. Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology. 2025; 15(03):24-47. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rtcet/article=2025/view=234964


References

  1. Bibri, S. E. (2020). Smart sustainable cities of the future. Springer.
  2. Datta, A. (2015). New urban utopias of postcolonial India. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1), 3–22.
  3. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs. (2021). Delhi Master Plan 2041 (Draft). Govt. of India.
  4. Roy, A. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76–87.
  5. UN-Habitat. (2016). World Cities Report 2016: Urbanization and Development – Emerging Futures. Nairobi.
  6. Sharma, A. (2019). Smart cities and urban infrastructure: A policy critique. Economic and Political Weekly, 54(32), 45–53.
  7. Singh, R. B. (Ed.). (2021). Urban and Regional Planning in India. Springer.
  8. Ghosh, S. (2021). Urban heritage and smart city development in India. Journal of Urban Management, 10(2), 85–94.
  9. Jain, A., & Mor, S. (2018). The role of GIS in urban planning in India. IJARCS, 9(2), 335–340.
  10. Bhagat, R. B., & Mohanty, S. (2009). Urbanization and migration in India. Asian Population Studies, 5(1), 5–20.
  11. McKinsey Global Institute. (2010). India’s Urban Awakening: Building Inclusive Cities.
  12. Mehta, M. (2018). Urban sustainability and smart cities in India. Current Urban Studies, 6(2), 231–245.
  13. Anand, S., & Tiwari, G. (2006). A gendered perspective of the shelter–transport–livelihood link. Transport Reviews, 26(1), 63–80.
  14. Joshi, R., & Saxena, R. (2020). Role of ICT in urban India. International Journal of Innovative Tech & Exploring Engineering, 9(4), 12–17.
  15. Kumar, R. (2016). Smart cities in India: Challenges and opportunities. McGraw Hill Education.
  16. Aggarwal, M. (2021). Adaptive reuse in Indian heritage cities. Built Heritage, 5(1), 67–78.
  17. Batty, M. (2013). The new science of cities. MIT Press.
  18. Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed. Columbia University Press.
  19. Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. Norton.
  20. World Bank. (2021). Smart Cities Mission: Implementation and Impact Assessment Report.
  21. (2021). MPD 2041 Volume I: Vision, Strategies and Action Plan.
  22. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
  23. Mahadevia, D. (2011). Branded and renewed cities. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(31), 60–69.
  24. Bansal, S., & Meenakshi, R. (2021). Green Infrastructure for Indian Cities. TERI.
  25. Jain, G. (2022). AI for urban governance in India. Urban India, 42(1), 45–58.
  26. Hwang, T., & Ng, Y. (2017). Singapore’s Smart Nation: Vision and implementation. Asian Journal of Public Affairs, 10(2), 9–20.
  27. Batty, M., Axhausen, K., Giannotti, F., et al. (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214, 481–518.
  28. Kumar, A., & Singh, D. (2020). Urban resilience through climate-responsive design. Journal of Environmental Planning, 45(4), 211–228.
  29. Barcelona City Council. (2020). Barcelona Smart City Strategy.
  30. (2009). Toolkit for Urban Infrastructure and Governance. Govt. of India.
  31. Revi, A., & Rosenzweig, C. (2013). The urban opportunity. Nature Climate Change, 3(9), 775–776.
  32. Sassen, S. (2001). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press.
  33. Ahluwalia, I. J. (2011). Transforming our cities: Postcards of change. HarperCollins.
  34. (2018). Framework for Urban Climate Resilience.
  35. Singh, R. J., & Lahiri, S. (2019). GIS-based Planning for Indian Cities. CRC Press.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 15
Issue 03
Received 11/08/2025
Accepted 04/09/2025
Published 09/09/2025
Publication Time 29 Days
100

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics