Love Deshwal,
Kartik A. Patel,
Abstract
Humanity has always been at the mercy of natural disasters, which frequently result in widespread devastation and displacement. However, scientific advancements, technological innovations, and extensive research have significantly mitigated the loss of life, property, and essential resources. One of the critical challenges in the aftermath of disasters is providing adequate and timely shelter, food, and medicine to the affected populations, often under constrained resources and logistical difficulties. In response to these pressing needs, current research has increasingly focused on developing efficient, economical, and sustainable solutions for emergency shelters. The innovative columns being tested in this project represent a breakthrough in disaster management solutions. These cost-effective structural components do not require highly skilled labour for their construction, making them ideal for deployment in disaster-affected regions where resources and expertise are often scarce. Furthermore, these columns are designed to be exceptionally durable, versatile, and long-lasting, ensuring they can withstand substantial loads, extreme environmental conditions, and natural stresses. The overarching goal of this project is to bridge the gap between temporary emergency shelters and permanent infrastructure by providing a scalable and adaptable solution. These columns not only simplify and accelerate the construction process but also enhance the structural integrity of shelters, enabling the rapid and resource-efficient development of essential infrastructure. Consequently, they offer a promising long-term solution for disaster relief, empowering communities to recover and rebuild more effectively and sustainably in the aftermath of natural disasters.
Keywords: Natural disasters, emergency shelters, disaster relief, innovative columns, cost-effective construction, durable infrastructure, sustainable solutions, post-disaster recovery, rapid construction, load-bearing structures, resource efficiency, temporary to permanent housing, structural integrity, disaster management
[This article belongs to Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology ]
Love Deshwal, Kartik A. Patel. Experimental Analysis of Axially Compressed Precast Concrete Pressure Pipes Filled with Concrete. Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology. 2025; 15(01):28-37.
Love Deshwal, Kartik A. Patel. Experimental Analysis of Axially Compressed Precast Concrete Pressure Pipes Filled with Concrete. Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology. 2025; 15(01):28-37. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rtcet/article=2025/view=207083
References
1. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). IS 458:2003 – Precast Concrete Pipes (With and Without Reinforcement). New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards; 2003.
2. Huang CS, Hu HT, Wu MH. Nonlinear analysis of axially loaded concrete-filled tube columns with confinement effect. J Struct Eng. 2003;129(10):1322-1329.
3. Rechart FE, Brandtzaeg A, Brown RL. A study of failure of concrete under combined compressive stresses. Univ Illinois Bull. 1928;26(40):1-104.
4. Mander JB, Priestley MN, Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng. 1988;114(8):1804-1826.
5. Gardner J, Jacobson R. Structural behavior of concrete-filled steel tubes. ACI J. 1967;64(38):404-413.
6. de Oliveira WLA, Nardin SD, El Debs ALH, El Debs MK. Evaluation of passive confinement in CFT columns. J Constr Steel Res. 2010;66(4):487-495.
7. Jian C, Long YL. Axial load behavior of rectangular CFT stub columns with binding bars. Adv Struct Eng. 2007;10(5):517-529.
8. Gupta PK, Khaudhair ZA, Ahuja AK. Computational study on performance of circular concrete-filled steel tubular columns. Int J Struct Eng. 2014;5(1):46-62.
9. de Oliveira WLA, Nardin SD, El Debs ALH, El Debs MK. Influence of concrete strength and length/diameter on the axial capacity of CFT columns. J Constr Steel Res. 2009;65(12):2103-2110.
10. Newman K, Newman JB. Failure theories and design criteria for plain concrete. Wiley Interscience. 1971;963-995.
11. Saatcioglu M, Rizvi SR. Strength and ductility of confined concrete. J Struct Eng. 1992;118(6):1590-1607.
12. Ahmad SH, Shah SP. Complete triaxial stress-strain curves for concrete. J Struct Eng. 1982;108(4):728-742.
13. Montaya E, Vecchio FJ, Sheikh SA. Compression field modeling of confined concrete. Struct Eng Mech. 2001;12(3):275-294.
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 01 |
| Received | 16/12/2024 |
| Accepted | 03/01/2025 |
| Published | 07/01/2025 |
| Publication Time | 22 Days |
Login
PlumX Metrics