Seismic Analysis of G+30 RCC Frmaed Structure and Use of R.C Jacketing

Year : 2024 | Volume :14 | Issue : 03 | Page : 20-37
By
vector

Pratik S. Dahiwale,

vector

R.S. Londhe,

Abstract document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_121135’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

In high-rise buildings, such as G+30 reinforced concrete (RCC) framed structures, key concerns during seismic events include maintaining structural integrity, preventing catastrophic collapse, and ensuring the safety of occupants. Seismic retrofitting is a vital process aimed at enhancing the resilience of such buildings and infrastructure against earthquake forces, by strengthening their ability to withstand seismic activity. This abstract provides an overview of numerous seismic retrofitting projects implemented worldwide, focusing on the methodologies used, technologies adopted, and outcomes achieved. These projects integrate advanced materials and techniques, such as fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs), base isolators, and energy-dissipating devices, which not only enhance the safety and longevity of existing structures but also minimize the economic losses associated with seismic events. The use of FRPs, for example, provides lightweight, high-strength solutions for reinforcing vulnerable structural elements, while base isolators decouple a building from ground movements, thereby reducing the forces transmitted during an earthquake. Energy-dissipating devices absorb and dissipate seismic energy, preventing structural damage and extending the building’s lifespan. Case studies from regions with high seismic activity, such as Japan, California, and New Zealand, highlight the effectiveness of various retrofitting techniques. These examples demonstrate how adherence to local building codes, coupled with community engagement and education, plays a crucial role in the successful implementation of retrofitting initiatives. Furthermore, the ongoing challenges faced by seismic retrofitting projects—including funding limitations, stakeholder coordination, and the need for continuous advancements in engineering practices—are discussed, stressing the importance of proactive and innovative approaches to safeguard urban environments. This review underscores that comprehensive seismic retrofitting strategies are essential for reducing risks, protecting lives, and enhancing community resilience in earthquake-prone areas.

Keywords: Seismic retrofitting, structural resilience, RCC framed structure, fiber-reinforced polymers, base isolators, energy-dissipating devices, earthquake forces, structural integrity, collapse prevention, advanced materials

[This article belongs to Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology (rtcet)]

How to cite this article:
Pratik S. Dahiwale, R.S. Londhe. Seismic Analysis of G+30 RCC Frmaed Structure and Use of R.C Jacketing. Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology. 2024; 14(03):20-37.
How to cite this URL:
Pratik S. Dahiwale, R.S. Londhe. Seismic Analysis of G+30 RCC Frmaed Structure and Use of R.C Jacketing. Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology. 2024; 14(03):20-37. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rtcet/article=2024/view=0

Full Text PDF

Full Text PDF

References
document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_121135’);});Edit

  1. Cucuzza R, Domaneschi M, Camata G, Marano GC, Formisano A, Brigante D. FRMC retrofitting techniques for masonry walls: a literature review and some laboratory tests. ELSEVIER. 2023;44:2190-7.
  2. Rain K, Subedi S, Chaudhary P, Poudel S, Paudel S. Numerical Study on Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Beam. ResearchGate, 5th ICET. 2023;5:1-7.
  3. Dadmand B, Pourbaba M, Riahi R. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Different Types of Jacketing Effect on Retrofitting RC Short Columns Using ECC Concrete. ResearchGate. 2022;66:603-13.
  4. Mumtaz Y, Nasiri A, Tetsuhiro S. A comparative study on retrofitting concrete column by FRP-Wrapping and RC-Jacketing methods: A feasibility study for Afghanistan. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2021;14:652-4.
  5. Kumar SVN, Reddy CN, Vineeth T, Madhu P, Meenakshi V, Naik SP. Analysis of Retrofitting on Residential Building. RJIT College Thesis. 2021.
  6. Silva MAL, Dedigamuwa KV, Gamage JCPH. Performance of severely damaged reinforced concrete flat slab-column connections strengthened with Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer. ELSEVIER, Composite Structure. 2021;255:112-963.
  7. Kamalakannan SM, Murali SAA, Malik M, Saravanan NA, Kumar BV, Vijayaragavan R, et al. Retrofitting of an existing structure design and techniques. ICAE, IOP Conference. 2021;P-P 012-059.
  8. Nigam PK, Akhtar S. Retrofitting practices in various categories of RCC structures – A comprehensive review. ELSEVIER. 2021;45:7123-31.
  9. Gkournelos PD, Triantafillou TC, Bournas DA. Seismic upgrading of existing reinforced concrete buildings: A state-of-the-art review. ELSEVIER. 2021;240:112-273.
  10. Sakthimurugan K, Baskar K. Experimental investigation on RCC external beam-column joints retrofitted with basalt textile fabric under static loading. ELSEVIER. 2021;268:001-114.
  11. Aldhafairi F, Hassan A, Abd-El-Hafez LM, Abouelezz AEY. Different techniques of steel jacketing for retrofitting of different types of concrete beams after elevated temperature exposure. ELSEVIER. 2020;28:713-25.
  12. Trapani FD, Malavisi M, Marano GC, Greco R, Ferrotto MF. Optimal Design Algorithm for Seismic Retrofitting of RC Column with Steel Jacketing Technique. ELSEVIER. 2020;44:639-46.
  13. Mukhopadhyay T, Naskar S, Dey S, Chakrabarti A. Condition Assessment and Strengthening of Aged Structures: Perspective Based on a Critical Case Study. ASCE. 2019;24:1-14.
  14. Ahmed MM, Imam MH, Tahora S, Haque M. Study of Seismic Performance of RCC Building Located in Different Seismic Zones in Bangladesh. MAT. 2019;5:13-8.
  15. Fauzan F, Ismail FA, Jauhari ZA. Seismic Retrofitting Analysis Using Concrete Jacketing and Shear Wall on Dental Hospital Building of Andalas University. IOP. 2019;602:012-108.
  16. Immanial V, Teja RS. A project on Retrofitting of Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Steel Bracings. JES. 2018;9:16-25.
  17. Vecchio CD, Ludovico MD, Balsamo A, Prota A. Seismic Retrofit of Real Beam-Column Joints Using Fiber-Reinforced Cement Composites. ASCE. 2018;144:001-12.
  18. Hasan A, Kibria MG, Hasan FM. Seismic Performance Assessment of a Multistoried Building and Retrofitting of RC Columns. ResearchGate. 2017;14:79-86.
  19. Dingoekar P, Srivastava. Retrofitting-Comparative Study of RC Jacketing and FRP Wrapping. IAEME. 2016;7:304-10.
  20. Seo J, Hu JW, Davaajamts B. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Multistory Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame Structure with Shear Walls. Sustainability. 2015;7:14287-308.
  21. Mivehchi M, Ansari F. Introduction of the Software of Seismic Retrofitting Design for Existing Building in Iran. 14th WCEE. 2008.
  22. IS Code: 456:2000. Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete.
  23. IS Code: 875 (Part 1): 1987. Code of Practice for Design Loads – Dead Loads.
  24. IS Code: 875 (Part 2): 1987. Code of Practice for Design Loads – Imposed Loads.
  25. IS Code: 875 (Part 3): 2015. Code of Practice for Design Loads – Wind Loads.
  26. IS Code: 2016. Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design Structure.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 14
Issue 03
Received 16/10/2024
Accepted 18/10/2024
Published 23/10/2024
213