An Analytical Study on Learning Difficulties in Estimation Theory Among Undergraduate Engineering Students

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2026 | Volume : 15 | Issue : 01 | Page :
    By

    Sri Raksha MS,

  • Subhasshini M,

  • Pon Sweatha S,

  • Tarunprakash S,

  • Prabakaran R,

  1. Student, ME. Construction Management, Coimbatore Institute of Technology Avinashi Rd, Civil Aerodrome Post, Tamil Nadu, India
  2. Student, ME. Construction Management, Coimbatore Institute of Technology Avinashi Rd, Civil Aerodrome Post, Tamil Nadu, India
  3. Student, ME. Construction Management, Coimbatore Institute of Technology Avinashi Rd, Civil Aerodrome Post, Tamil Nadu, India
  4. Student, ME. Construction Management, Coimbatore Institute of Technology Avinashi Rd, Civil Aerodrome Post, Tamil Nadu, India
  5. Assistant Professor, ME. Construction Management, Coimbatore Institute of Technology Avinashi Rd, Civil Aerodrome Post, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

Estimation Theory is a critical mathematical foundation for all engineering disciplines, enabling learners to model uncertainty, analyse signals, and derive optimal estimators. However, undergraduate students frequently struggle with its abstract properties, complex derivations, and prerequisite statistical concepts. This study investigates the key learning difficulties faced by students across multiple engineering branches using diagnostic tests, structured questionnaires, and interviews. The findings reveal that students commonly experience challenges related to weak probability basics, lack of conceptual clarity, high mathematical abstraction, and limited exposure to real-world problem contexts. Additional factors such as the absence of visualization tools, overdependence on rote learning, and difficulty in deriving estimators like Maximum Likelihood Estimation and MMSE further contribute to poor comprehension. The study proposes targeted strategies—including simulation-based teaching, competency-based assessments, and the integration of practical engineering examples—to enhance student understanding and strengthen learning outcomes in Estimation Theory.

Keywords: Estimation Theory, Engineering Mathematics, Learning Barriers, Probability, Pedagogy, Undergraduate Engineering

[This article belongs to Research & Reviews : Journal of Statistics ]

How to cite this article:
Sri Raksha MS, Subhasshini M, Pon Sweatha S, Tarunprakash S, Prabakaran R. An Analytical Study on Learning Difficulties in Estimation Theory Among Undergraduate Engineering Students. Research & Reviews : Journal of Statistics. 2026; 15(01):-.
How to cite this URL:
Sri Raksha MS, Subhasshini M, Pon Sweatha S, Tarunprakash S, Prabakaran R. An Analytical Study on Learning Difficulties in Estimation Theory Among Undergraduate Engineering Students. Research & Reviews : Journal of Statistics. 2026; 15(01):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjost/article=2026/view=242105


References

  1. Kaplar, M., Lužanin, Z., & Verbić, S. (2021). Evidence of probability misconception in engineering students. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(2), 1–12.
  2. Díaz, C., & de la Fuente, J. (2007). Assessing students’ difficulties with conditional probability and Bayesian reasoning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(3), 45–58.
  3. Fernández, T., Molina, M., & Batanero, C. (2024). Teaching and learning of probability: A comprehensive review. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56(1), 15–32.
  4. Garfield, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1988). Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 44–63.
  5. Sari, D., Suryadi, D., & Dasari, D. (2024). Learning obstacles of probability based on probabilistic thinking level. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 82–96.
  6. Memnun, D.S., Özbilen, S., & Dinç, E. (2019). Difficulties and failures in understanding probability concepts. Journal of Educational Issues, 5(2), 112–127.
  7. Nurrahmah, S., Kartono, & Zaenuri, A. (2023). Misconceptions in solving discrete random variable problems. ISET Conference Proceedings, 3, 211–219.
  8. Kandeel, R. (2019). Students’ academic difficulties in statistics and probability. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(14), 66–75.
  9. Masel, J., Humphreys, K., & Treasure, J. (2015). Evidence-based medicine as a tool for probability education. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(3), 1–11.
  10. Zhao, X., Valdez, A., & Kim, S. (2007). Students’ misconceptions of statistical inference: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 2(4), 215–230.
  11. Tursunali, A. (2024). Teaching probability through practical and applied problems. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 18(1), 54–67.
  12. Tan, M., & Vighnarajah, R. (2022). Students’ misconceptions in probability learning. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(2), 101–115.
  13. Batanero, C., & Díaz, C. (2012). Training teachers to teach probability. Journal of Statistics Education, 20(3), 1–14.
  14. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430–454.
  15. Konold, C. (1995). Confessions of a coin flipper and would-be instructor. The American Statistician, 49(2), 203–209.
  16. delMas, R., Garfield, J., & Chance, B. (2004). Using simulation to improve students’ statistical reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3(2), 20–38.
  17. Sotos, A.C., Vanhoof, S., Van den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2007). Students’ misconceptions about statistical inference: A review. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 98–113.
  18. Budgett, S., & Pfannkuch, M. (2010). Statistical inference in high-school curriculum: Contrasting two teaching approaches. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(4), 501–514.
  19. Chance, B., delMas, R., & Garfield, J. (2005). Reasoning about sampling distributions. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 1–23.
  20. Biehler, R., & Prömmel, A. (2020). Students’ understanding of expectation and variance when reasoning with distributions. Journal of Statistics Education, 28(2), 145–162.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 15
Issue 01
Received 09/12/2025
Accepted 17/04/2026
Published 30/04/2026
Publication Time 142 Days
7

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics