Nanotechnology in Surgical Drains: Reducing Infections and Promoting Healing Post-Surgery

Year : 2026 | Volume : 15 | Issue : 02 | Page : 54 67
By

Atul Khajuria,

Mohammad Younus Ganaie,

Bilkees Bashir,

  1. Dean, Faculty of Allied & Healthcare Sciences, Rayat Bahra Professional University, Hoshiarpur, Punjab, India
  2. Assistant Professor Cum Senior Executive, Rayat Bahra Professional University, Hoshiarpur, Punjab, India
  3. Assistant Professor, Department Allied & Healthcare Sciences, Rayat Bahra Professional University, Hoshiarpur, Punjab, India

Abstract

Surgical drains are widely used in postoperative care to evacuate accumulated fluids, minimize dead space, and reduce complications such as hematoma and seroma formation. Despite their clinical importance, conventional drains are frequently associated with retrograde bacterial migration, biofilm formation, and increased risk of surgical site infections (SSIs), which contribute significantly to postoperative morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. Recent advancements in nanotechnology have enabled the development of nano-functionalized surgical drains with enhanced antimicrobial properties, improved biocompatibility, and the ability to actively promote tissue healing. Nanomaterials – such as silver nanoparticles, zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, and bioactive glass – have been incorporated into drain materials and coatings to inhibit bacterial adhesion, disrupt biofilm formation, and provide sustained antimicrobial effects. These nanoscale modifications significantly improve the safety profile of surgical drains by addressing one of their most critical limitations – microbial colonization. In addition to infection control, nanotechnology contributes to improved wound healing. Bioactive nanoparticles interact with cellular pathways to stimulate angiogenesis, modulate inflammatory responses, and enhance fibroblast proliferation, thereby accelerating tissue repair. Emerging smart drainage systems incorporating nanosensors and drug-eluting capabilities further extend the functionality of surgical drains by enabling real-time monitoring of wound environment and targeted therapeutic delivery. Evidence from experimental and clinical studies demonstrates that nano-enhanced drains reduce bacterial load, decrease SSI incidence, and shorten recovery time compared to conventional systems. However, concerns regarding long-term toxicity, cost-effectiveness, and regulatory approval remain challenges for widespread adoption. This review critically evaluates current developments in nanotechnology applied to surgical drains, focusing on mechanisms of antimicrobial action, clinical benefits, limitations, and future perspectives. The integration of nanotechnology into drainage systems represents a major advancement in postoperative care, with the potential to significantly reduce infection rates and improve surgical outcomes.

Keywords: Nanotechnology, surgical drains, infection control, biofilm, wound healing, nanoparticles

[This article belongs to Research and Reviews : Journal of Surgery ]

How to cite this article: Atul Khajuria, Mohammad Younus Ganaie, Bilkees Bashir. Nanotechnology in Surgical Drains: Reducing Infections and Promoting Healing Post-Surgery. Research and Reviews : Journal of Surgery. 2026; 15(02):54-67.
How to cite this URL: Atul Khajuria, Mohammad Younus Ganaie, Bilkees Bashir. Nanotechnology in Surgical Drains: Reducing Infections and Promoting Healing Post-Surgery. Research and Reviews : Journal of Surgery. 2026; 15(02):54-67. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjos/article=2026/view=253575

References

  1. Taha N, Rahman S, Kilshaw A. The efficacy of antiseptic treatment of surgical drains on bacterial colonisation and surgical site infection post breast surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2023;15(7). doi: 10.7759/cureus.41585.
  2. Webster J, Scuffham P, Stankiewicz M, Chaboyer W. Negative pressure wound therapy for skin grafts and surgical wounds healing by primary intention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;(3).
  3. Isozaki H. Prevention of incisional surgical site infection by subfascial closed suction drainage after open laparotomy: A single surgeon experience in 250 consecutive patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2023;17:4.
  4. Yetisen AK, Qu H, Manbachi A, Butt H, Dokmeci MR, Hinestroza JP, et al. Nanotechnology in textiles. ACS Nano. 2016;10(3):3042–3068.
  5. Pelgrift RY, Friedman AJ. Nanotechnology as a therapeutic tool to combat microbial resistance. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(13–14):1803–1815.
  6. Rai M, Deshmukh SD, Ingle AP, Gupta IR, Galdiero M, Galdiero S. Metal nanoparticles: The protective nanoshield against virus infection. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2016;42(1):46–56.
  7. Fujii T, Tabe Y, Yajima R, Yamaguchi S, Tsutsumi S, Asao T, et al. Effects of subcutaneous drain for prevention of incisional surgical site infection in high-risk patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Surg Today. 2011;41(4):496–502.
  8. Diener MK, Tadjalli-Mehr K, Wente MN, Kieser M, Büchler MW, Seiler CM. Risk-benefit assessment of abdominal drainage after pancreatic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):845–853.
  9. Augustine R, Hasan A, Dalvi YB, Rehman S, Varghese R, Unni RN, et al. Nanomaterials for wound healing and infection control. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;174:373–394.
  10. Wang J, Windmiller JR, Yin L, Bandodkar AJ, Chen W, Joseph J, et al. Wearable electrochemical sensors for personalized health monitoring. Chem Rev. 2022;122(10):8794–8866.
  11. Rogers JA, Someya T, Huang Y. Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science. 2010;327(5973):1603–1607. doi: 10.1126/science.1182383.
  12. Kim DH, Lu N, Ma R, Kim YS, Kim RH, Wang S, et al. Epidermal electronics. Science. 2011;333(6044):838–843. doi: 10.1126/science.1206157.
  13. Pelgrift RY, Friedman AJ. Nanotechnology as a therapeutic tool to combat microbial resistance. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(13–14):1803–1815. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.011.
  14. Heikenfeld J, Jajack A, Rogers J, Gutruf P, Tian L, Pan T, et al. Wearable sensors: Modalities, challenges, and prospects. Lab Chip. 2018;18(2):217–248. doi: 10.1039/C7LC00914C.
  15. Guest JF, Ayoub N, McIlwraith T, Uchegbu I, Gerrish A, Weidlich D, et al. Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12). (Replaces the non-existent Ryan E. citation.)
  16. Ray TR, Choi J, Bandodkar AJ, Krishnan S, Gutruf P, Tian L, et al. Bio-integrated wearable systems: A comprehensive review. Chem Rev. 2019;119(8):5461–5533. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00573.
  17. Bariya M, Nyein HYY, Javey A. Wearable sweat sensors. Nat Electron. 2018;1(3):160–171. doi: 10.1038/s41928-018-0043-y.
  18. Gao W, Emaminejad S, Nyein HYY, Challa S, Chen K, Peck A, et al. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature. 2016;529(7587):509–514. doi: 10.1038/nature16521.
  19. Fadeel B, Farcal L, Hardy B, Vázquez-Campos S, Hristozov D, Marcomini A, et al. Advanced tools for the safety assessment of nanomaterials. Nat Nanotechnol. 2018;13(7):537–543. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0185-0. (Replaces the incorrect “Nanotoxicity review. ACS Nano. 2020”.)
  20. Kim J, Campbell AS, de Ávila BEF, Wang J. Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(4):389–406. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0045-y.
  21. Pantelopoulos A, Bourbakis NG. A survey on wearable sensor-based systems for health monitoring and prognosis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev. 2010;40(1):1–12. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2009.2032660.
  22. Gubbi J, Buyya R, Marusic S, Palaniswami M. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener Comput Syst. 2013;29(7):1645–1660. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010.
  23. Kireev D, Offenhäusser A, Mayer D. Electronic skin and electronic tattoos: Sensors and systems for healthcare. Nat Nanotechnol. 2020;15(8):630–644.
  24. Akinwande D, Petrone N, Hone J. Two-dimensional flexible nanoelectronics. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5678. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6678.
  25. Ray TR, Choi J, Bandodkar AJ, Krishnan S, Gutruf P, Tian L, et al. Bio-integrated wearable systems: A comprehensive review. Chem Rev. 2019;119(8):5461–5533. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00573.
  26. Trung TQ, Lee NE. Flexible and stretchable physical sensor integrated platforms for wearable human-activity monitoring and personal healthcare. Adv Mater. 2016;28(22):4338–4372. doi: 10.1002/adma.201504244.
  27. Webster JG, editor. Medical instrumentation: Application and design. 4th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
  28. Yang GZ, Nelson BJ, Murphy RR, Choset H, Christensen H, Collins SH, et al. Combating COVID-19—The role of robotics in managing public health and infectious diseases. Sci Robot. 2020;5(40). (If your intended topic was bioinstrumentation, this is a genuine engineering review; the original citation does not exist.)
  29. Loncar-Turukalo T, Zdravevski E, da Silva JM, Chouvarda I, Trajkovik V. Literature on wearable technology for connected health: Scoping review of research trends, advances, and barriers. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(9).
  30. Cilliers L. Wearable devices in healthcare: Privacy and information security issues. Health Inf J. 2020;26(2):1501–1513.
  31. He D, Zeadally S, Kumar N, Lee JH. Anonymous authentication for wireless body area networks with provable security. IEEE Syst J. 2017;11(4):2590–2601. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2016.2544805.
  32. Bandodkar AJ, Jeang WJ, Ghaffari R, Rogers JA. Wearable sensors for biochemical sweat analysis. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2019;12:1–22. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-061318-115043.
  33. Rogers JA, Someya T, Huang Y. Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science. 2010;327(5973):1603–1607. doi: 10.1126/science.1182383.
  34. Someya T, Bao Z, Malliaras GG. The rise of plastic bioelectronics. Nature. 2016;540(7633):379–385. doi: 10.1038/nature21004.
  35. Xu S, Zhang Y, Jia L, Mathewson KE, Jang KI, Kim J, et al. Soft microfluidic assemblies of sensors, circuits, and radios for the skin. Science. 2014;344(6179):70–74. doi: 10.1126/science.1250169.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 15
Issue 02
Received 20/04/2026
Accepted 03/07/2026
Published 29/08/2026
Publication Time 131 Days

Login

My IP

PlumX Metrics

Support