The Symbiosis Between Spherical Refractive Error Cylindrical Refractive Error

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]

n

Open Access

n

[/if 992]n

n

Year : April 11, 2024 at 11:30 am | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume :13 [else] Volume :13[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : 01 | Page : 67-76

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

    n t

    [foreach 286]n

    n

    Sankhajyoti Saha, Kapil Dev, P.R. Dutta

  1. [/foreach]

    n

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Research Scholar, Research Supervisor, Assistant Professor, OPJS University, Churu, OPJS University, Churu, NSHM Knowledge Campus, Rajasthan, Rajasthan, West Bengal, India, India, India

    2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]nn

n

Abstract

nThis study aimed to acknowledge the link between spherical refractive error and cylindrical refractive error, which is crucial for diagnosing and managing visual abnormalities productively. This research employed a multi-center, cross-sectional, analytical, and retrospective approach to investigate refractive errors. The objective results were refined subjectively to the best visual acuity with conventional clinical representations of refraction using the sphere, cylinder, and axis. The gathered data underwent analysis utilizing statistical software packages such as SPSS and Minitab. The data were abridged as mean, standard error, and 95% CI of the population mean. The link was determined with the box-plot function of the graph, Pairwise Pearson Correlations, and a comparison of the 95% CI of the population mean for the Spherical Refractive Error and Cylindrical Refractive Error. Line plot graphs were utilized to quantify the ratios of With-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism, Against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism, and Oblique astigmatism (OA). The degree of astigmatism was highest in individuals with spherical refractive error between -0.12 D to -2.87 D (Low Myopia) and between +3.12 D to +5.00 D (Moderate Hyperopia). Mean cylindrical valuation was -0.69±0.05 in Low Myopia and -1.86±0.41 D in Moderate Hyperopia. The proportion of WTR astigmatism decreased in (47–54) year age group, whereas the distributions of ATR astigmatism increased in the (39–46) year of age groups.
Correlation between Spherical Refractive Error & Cylindrical Refractive Error was r=0.018, p=0.613. Except for low myopia and moderate hyperopia, the spherical refractive component appears to be autonomous of the cylindrical refractive integrant. Refractive spherical and cylindrical correlations are not as brawny as those between the other eyes

n

n

n

Keywords: Spherical refractive error, Cylindrical refractive error, Astigmatism, With-the-rule astigmatism, Against-the-rule astigmatism, Oblique Astigmatism

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Research & Reviews : Journal of Medical Science and Technology(rrjomst)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Research & Reviews : Journal of Medical Science and Technology(rrjomst)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Sankhajyoti Saha, Kapil Dev, P.R. Dutta The Symbiosis Between Spherical Refractive Error Cylindrical Refractive Error rrjomst April 11, 2024; 13:67-76

n

How to cite this URL: Sankhajyoti Saha, Kapil Dev, P.R. Dutta The Symbiosis Between Spherical Refractive Error Cylindrical Refractive Error rrjomst April 11, 2024 {cited April 11, 2024};13:67-76. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjomst/article=April 11, 2024/view=0

n

n[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[else] nvar fieldValue = “[user_role]”;nif (fieldValue == ‘indexingbodies’) {n document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘);n }nelse if (fieldValue == ‘administrator’) { document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘); }nelse if (fieldValue == ‘rrjomst’) { document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘); }n else { document.write(‘ ‘); }n [/if 992] n

n[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

nn

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  1. Pooja Parthasarathi, Stokkermans TJ. The Conoid of Sturm. Nih.gov. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK587355/Available from:
  2. Touzeau, O., Gaujoux, T., Bullet, J., Allouch, C., Borderie, V., & Laroche, L. (2012). Relations entre les paramètres de la réfraction : sphère, cylindre et axe [Relationships between refractive parameters: sphere, cylinder and axis]. Journal francais d’ophtalmologie, 35(8), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2011.12.006
  3. Heidary, G., Ying, G. S., Maguire, M. G., & Young, T. L. (2005). The association of astigmatism and spherical refractive error in a high myopia cohort. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 82(4), 244–247. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.opx.0000159361.17876.96
  4. Rezvan, Farhad & Yekta, AbbasAli & Hashemi, Hassan & Mehravaran, Shiva & Ostadi moghaddam, Hadi & Heravian Shandiz, Javad & Yekta, Reihaneh & jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim & Shahnazi, Ashkan & Asgari, Soheila & Khabazkhoob, Mehdi. (2011). The Association between Astigmatism and Spherical Refractive Error in A Clinical Population. Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology. 23. 37–
  5. Official Website of Kolkata Municipal Corporation. (n.d.). https://www.kmcgov.in/KMCPortal/jsp/KolkataStatistics.jsp
  6. Background. (n.d.). NKDA – New Town Kolkata, Development Authority West Bengal. https://www.nkdamar.org/Pages/Background.aspx
  7. Skuta, G. L, Cantor, L. B, Weiss, J. S, (2012). 2012-2013 Basic and clinical science course. Section 03, Clinical optics. 110– American Academy Of Ophthalmology
  8. Theory And Practice Of Optics And Refraction. Google Books. 2024. Available from: https://books.google.com.cu/books?id=qYeD3VHi8OsC&printsec=copyright#v=onepage&q&f=false.
  9. Flitcroft D. I. (2014). Emmetropisation and the aetiology of refractive errors. Eye (London, England), 28(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2013.276
  10. Çavdarlı, C., & Topçu-Yılmaz, P. (2018). Does Long-term Soft Contact Lens Wear Affect Corneal and Anterior Chamber Parameters?. Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 48(4), 166–170. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.53486
  11. Wang, X., McCulley, J. P., Bowman, R. W., & Cavanagh, H. D. (2002). Time to resolution of contact lens-induced corneal warpage prior to refractive surgery. The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc, 28(4), 169–171. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ICL.0000018042.02034.AB
  12. Pinazo-Durán, M. D., Zanón-Moreno, V., García-Medina, J. J., Arévalo, J. F., Gallego-Pinazo, R., & Nucci, C. (2016). Eclectic Ocular Comorbidities and Systemic Diseases with Eye Involvement: A Review. BioMed research international, 2016, 6215745. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6215745
  13. Patasova, K., Khawaja, A. P., Tamraz, B., Williams, K. M., Mahroo, O. A., Freidin, M., Solebo, A. L., Vehof, J., Falchi, M., Rahi, J. S., Hammond, C. J., & Hysi, P. G. (2021). Association Between Medication-Taking and Refractive Error in a Large General Population-Based Cohort. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 62(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.2.15
  14. Green, M. B., & Duker, J. S. (2023). Adverse Ocular Effects of Systemic Medications. Life (Basel, Switzerland), 13(3), 660. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030660
  15. Rezvan, Farhad & Yekta, AbbasAli & Hashemi, Hassan & Mehravaran, Shiva & Ostadi moghaddam, Hadi & Heravian Shandiz, Javad & Yekta, Reihaneh & jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim & Shahnazi, Ashkan & Asgari, Soheila & Khabazkhoob, Mehdi. (2011). The Association between Astigmatism and Spherical Refractive Error in A Clinical Population. Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology. 23. 37–
  16. Duckman, R. H. (2006). Visual Development, Diagnosis, and Treatment of the Pediatric Patients. 73– Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  17. Rauniyar, D., & Das, A. V. (2022). Consanguinity and ocular disorders in India: Electronic medical records driven big data analytics. Indian journal of ophthalmology, 70(7), 2401–2407. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1553_21 )
  18. Sheeladevi, Sethu; Seelam, Bharani1,2; Nukella, Phanindra B3; Borah, Rishi R4; Ali, Rahul4; Keay, Lisa1,2. Prevalence of refractive errors, uncorrected refractive error, and presbyopia in adults in India: A systematic review. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 67(5):p 583–592, May 2019. | DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1235_18
  19. Blackie, C. A., & Harris, W. F. (1997). Refraction and keratometry: departures from and transformations toward multivariate normality. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 74(6), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199706000-00031

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]

    2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn

nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””]Regular Issue[else]Published[/if 424] Subscription Original Research

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 2146 equals=”Yes”]

[/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”]

[/if 2146]n

n

n

Volume 13
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] 01
Received March 5, 2024
Accepted March 18, 2024
Published April 11, 2024

n

n

Views: 16

n

n

n

n

nn function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n”}]