Livestock and Landscapes: Rethinking Carbon Sequestration Synergies for Transforming Livestock-Raising Paradigm

Year : 2026 | Volume : 14 | Issue : 03 | Page : 29 43
    By

    Md. Emran Hossain,

  • Shilpi Islam,

  1. Professor, Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Khulshi, Chattogram, , Bangladesh
  2. Professor, Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Gazipur Agricultural University, Salna, Gazipur, , Bangladesh

Abstract

The livestock sector plays a critical role in global agricultural systems, but its impact on climate change is a growing concern due to significant greenhouse gas emissions, particularly methane and nitrous oxide. As the demand for livestock products continues to rise, rethinking current practices becomes essential to mitigate environmental degradation and enhance sustainability. This study examines the synergies between livestock farming and carbon sequestration strategies within global landscapes, with a focus on innovative approaches that can transform traditional livestock-raising paradigms. It highlights the potential of integrating sustainable practices, such as rotational grazing, agroforestry, and carbon-smart breeding programs, to increase soil carbon storage and reduce emissions. Additionally, the role of technological innovations, such as precision livestock farming and methane inhibitors, is examined to enhance the efficiency of livestock production systems while minimizing environmental footprints. The paper further discusses the importance of agro-ecological integration, which not only increases carbon sequestration but also promotes biodiversity and ecosystem health. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for policy frameworks and incentives that support carbon sequestration initiatives, including carbon-credit trading and certification programs. Ultimately, this study presents a comprehensive approach to transforming the livestock-raising paradigm, offering practical solutions for fostering climate-resilient farming systems and contributing to global efforts to combat climate change. The findings suggest that through strategic integration of carbon sequestration practices, livestock farming can be redefined as a key player in sustainable agricultural development

Keywords: Agroforestry, carbon farming, carbon sequestration, climate change, emissions reduction, livestock management, methane inhibitors, precision livestock farming, rotational grazing, soil health, sustainable farming, technology in agriculture

[This article belongs to Research & Reviews : Journal of Ecology ]

How to cite this article:
Md. Emran Hossain, Shilpi Islam. Livestock and Landscapes: Rethinking Carbon Sequestration Synergies for Transforming Livestock-Raising Paradigm. Research & Reviews : Journal of Ecology. 2025; 14(03):29-43.
How to cite this URL:
Md. Emran Hossain, Shilpi Islam. Livestock and Landscapes: Rethinking Carbon Sequestration Synergies for Transforming Livestock-Raising Paradigm. Research & Reviews : Journal of Ecology. 2025; 14(03):29-43. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjoe/article=2025/view=235530


References

  1. Flessa H, Ruser R, Dörsch P, Kamp T, Jimenez MA, Munch JC, et al. Integrated evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O) from two farming systems in southern Germany. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2002;91(1–3):175–189. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00234-1.
  2. Chauhan DS, Ghosh N. Impact of climate change on livestock production: A review. J Anim Res. 2014;4(2):223–239. doi: 10.5958/2277-940X.2014.00009.6.
  3. Thornton PK, Herrero M. Potential for reduced methane and carbon dioxide emissions from livestock and pasture management in the tropics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(46):19667–1972. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912890107.
  4. Brewer KM, Gaudin ACM. Potential of crop-livestock integration to enhance carbon sequestration and agroecosystem functioning in semi-arid croplands. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;149:107936. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107936.
  5. Schatz T, Ffoulkes D, Shotton P, Hearnden M. Effect of high-intensity rotational grazing on the growth of cattle grazing buffel pasture in the Northern Territory and on soil carbon sequestration. Anim Prod Sci. 2020;60(15):1814–1821. doi: 10.1071/AN19552.
  6. Wagner M, Waterton C, Norton LR. Mob grazing: A nature-based solution for British farms producing pasture-fed livestock. Nature-Based Solut. 2023;3:100054. doi: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100054.
  7. Roberts AJ, Johnson NC. Effects of mob-grazing on soil and range quality vary with plant species and season in a semiarid grassland. Rangel Ecol Manag. 2021;79:139–149. doi: 1016/j.rama.2021.04.008.
  8. Fraser MD. Mixed-species grazing management to improve sustainability and biodiversity. Rev Sci Tech. 2018;37(1):247–257. doi: 10.20506/rst.37.1.2755.
  9. Jagadesh M, Dash M, Singh SK, Kumari A. Carbon footprints in agriculture: Challenges, mitigation strategies, and future prospects. In: Carbon Footprint Assessments Case Studies Best Pract. 2024. pp. 17–43. doi: 1007/978-3-031-70262-4_2.
  10. Teague R, Kreuter U. Managing grazing to restore soil health, ecosystem function, and ecosystem services. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2020;4:534187. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.534187.
  11. Khalil MI, Francaviglia R, Henry B, Klumpp K, Koncz P, Llorente M, et al. Strategic management of grazing grassland systems to maintain and increase organic carbon in soils. In: CO2 2019. pp. 1–20. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.84341.
  12. Vigan A, Lasseur J, Benoit M, Mouillot F, Eugène M, Mansard L, et al. Evaluating livestock mobility as a strategy for climate change mitigation: Combining models to address the specificities of pastoral systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2017;242:89–101. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.020.
  13. Nungula EZ, Chappa LR, Ranjan S, Sow S, Alnemari AM, Seleiman MF, et al. Ecosystem services through agroforestry systems and its sustainability. In: Agroforestry. 2024. pp. 223–254.
  14. Saikia P, Kumar A, Khan ML. Agroforestry: A sustainable land use system for livelihood security and climate change mitigation. In: C. B. Pandey, M. K. Gaur, R. K. Goyal, editors. Climate Change and Agroforestry. New Delhi: New India Publ Agency; 2017. pp. 61–70.
  15. Haddad FF, Herrera PM, Besbes B. Grazing with trees: A silvopastoral approach to managing and restoring drylands. Rome: Food & Agriculture Org.; 2022;180. doi: 10.4060/cc2280en.
  16. Paterson RT, Karanja GM, Nyaata OZ, Kariuki IW, Roothaert RL. A review of tree fodder production and utilization within smallholder agroforestry systems in Kenya. Agrofor Syst. 1998;41:181–199. doi: 10.1023/A:1006066128640.
  17. Raj AK, Raj RM, Kunhamu TK, Jamaludheen V, Chichaghare AR. Management of tree fodder banks for quality forage production and carbon sequestration in humid tropical cropping systems – An overview. Indian J Anim Sci. 2023;93(1):10–22. doi: 10.56093/ijans.v93i1.120692.
  18. Khan N, Jhariya MK, Banerjee A, Meena RS, Raj A, Yadav SK. Riparian conservation and restoration for ecological sustainability. In: Natural Resources Conservation and Advances for Sustainability. Elsevier; 2022. pp. 195–216. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822976-7.00003-X,
  19. De K, Sharma S, Kumawat PK, Kumar D, Mohapatra A, Sahoo A. Tree shade improves the comfort of sheep during extreme summer. J Vet Behav. 2020;40(7):103–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2020.10.003.
  20. Mume ID, Workalemahu S. Review on windbreaks agroforestry as a climate smart agriculture practices. Am J Agric For. 2021;9(6):342–347. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12.
  21. Baker TP, Moroni MT, Mendham D, Smith R, Hunt MA. Impacts of windbreak shelter on crop and livestock production. Crop Pasture Sci. 2018;69(8):785–796. doi: 10.1071/CP17242.
  22. Dagar JC, Gupta SR. Silvopasture options for enhanced biological productivity of degraded pasture/grazing lands: An overview. In: Agroforestry for Degraded Landscapes: Recent Advances and Emerging Challenges. 2020;2:163–227.
  23. Adetunji AT, Ncube B, Mulidzi R, Lewu FB. Management impact and benefit of cover crops on soil quality: A review. Soil Tillage Res. 2020;204:104717. doi: 1016/j.still.2020.104717.
  24. Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration and aggregation by cover cropping. J Soil Water Conserv. 2015;70(6):329–339. doi: 2489/jswc.70.6.329.
  25. Ernst O, Siri-Prieto G. Impact of perennial pasture and tillage systems on carbon input and soil quality indicators. Soil Tillage Res. 2009;105(2):260–268. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2009.08.001.
  26. Sprunger CD, Singh P, Martin T. Integrating perennials into agroecosystems for enhanced soil biodiversity and long-term sustainability. In: Biodiversity and Bioeconomy. 2024. pp. 199–216. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-95482-2.00009-2.
  27. Lyons KG, Török P, Hermann J-M, Kiehl K, Kirmer A, Kollmann J, et al. Challenges and opportunities for grassland restoration: A global perspective of best practices in the era of climate change. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2023;46:e02612. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02612.
  28. Abdalla K, Mutema M, Chivenge P, Everson C, Chaplot V. Grassland rehabilitation significantly increases soil carbon stocks by reducing net soil CO2 emissions. Soil Use Manag. 2022;38(2):1250–1265. doi: 10.1111/sum.12790.
  29. Ojija F. Perennial grasses: Natural allies for soil health and biodiversity, climate change mitigation, and invasive plant management. Grass Res. 2024;4(1):e020. doi: 10.48130/grares-0024-0019.
  30. Corlett RT. Restoration, reintroduction, and rewilding in a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol. 2016;31(6):453–462. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.017.
  31. Magdoff F, Weil RR. Soil organic matter management strategies. In: Soil Organic Matter in Sustainable Agriculture. 2004. pp. 45–65. doi: 10.1201/9780203496374.ch2.
  32. Murphy BW. Impact of soil organic matter on soil properties—a review with emphasis on Australian soils. Soil Res. 2015;53(6):605–635. doi: 10.1071/SR14246.
  33. Dang YP, Page KL, Dalal RC, Menzies NW. No-till farming systems for sustainable agriculture: An overview. In: No-till Farming Systems for Sustainable Agriculture: Challenges and Opportunities. Cham: Springer; 2020. pp. 3–20. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-46409-7.
  34. Reicosky DC. Carbon sequestration and environmental benefits from no-till systems. In: No-till farming systems. Spec Publ. 2008;3:43–58.
  35. Lal R. Biotechnical and soil bioengineering slope stabilization: A practical guide for erosion control. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1998;163(1). doi: 10.1097/00010694-199801000-00012.
  36. Goldan E, et al. Assessment of manure compost used as soil amendment—A review. Processes. 2023;11(4):1167. doi: 10.3390/pr11041167.
  37. Pajura R. Composting municipal solid waste and animal manure in response to the current fertilizer crisis—A recent review. Sci Total Environ. 2024;912:169221. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169221.
  38. Obileke K, Nwokolo N, Makaka G, Mukumba P, Onyeaka H. Anaerobic digestion: Technology for biogas production as a source of renewable energy—A review. Energy Environ. 2021;32(2):191–225. doi: 10.1177/0958305X20923117.
  39. Schröder J. Revisiting the agronomic benefits of manure: A correct assessment and exploitation of its fertilizer value spares the environment. Bioresour Technol. 2005;96(2):253–261. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.05.015.
  40. Mupambwa HA, Mnkeni PNS. Optimizing the vermicomposting of organic wastes amended with inorganic materials for production of nutrient-rich organic fertilizers: A review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25(11):10577–10595. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1328-4.
  41. Kumar S, Malav LC, Malav MK, Khan SA. Biogas slurry: Source of nutrients for eco-friendly agriculture. Int J Ext Res. 2015;2(Feb):42–46.
  42. Rahaman MA, Zhang Q, Shi Y, Zhan X, Li G. Biogas slurry application could potentially reduce N2O emissions and increase crop yield. Sci Total Environ. 2021;778:146269. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146269.
  43. Singh A, Sangramsing PB, Cheenu K, Vivek K. Integrated farming system. J Pharm Innov. 2022;11:1488–1496.
  44. Reddy PP, Reddy PP. Integrated crop–livestock farming systems. In: Sustainable Intensification of Crop Production. 2016. pp. 357–370. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-2702-4_23.
  45. Turmel M-S, Speratti A, Baudron F, Verhulst N, Govaerts B. Crop residue management and soil health: A systems analysis. Agric Syst. 2015;134(4):6–16. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.009.
  46. Hendrickson J, Sanderson M. Perennial-based agricultural systems and livestock impact on soil and ecological services. In: Soil health and intensification of agroecosystems. Elsevier; 2017. pp. 151–171. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-805317-1.00007-5.
  47. Capstaff NM, Miller AJ. Improving the yield and nutritional quality of forage crops. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:535. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00535.
  48. Arthur PF, Herd RM. Efficiency of feed utilisation by livestock—Implications and benefits of genetic improvement. Can J Anim Sci. 2005;85(3):281–290. doi: 10.4141/A04-062.
  49. Waghorn GC, Hegarty RS. Lowering ruminant methane emissions through improved feed conversion efficiency. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2011;166–7:291–301. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.019.
  50. Patra AK, Saxena J. Exploitation of dietary tannins to improve rumen metabolism and ruminant nutrition. J Sci Food Agric. 2011;91(1):24–37. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4152.
  51. McCauley JI, et al. Management of enteric methanogenesis in ruminants by algal-derived feed additives. Curr Pollut Rep. 2020;6(3):188–205. doi: 10.1007/s40726-020-00151-7.
  52. Tseten T, Sanjorjo RA, Kwon M, Kim SW. Strategies to mitigate enteric methane emissions from ruminant animals. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;32(3):269–277. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2202.02019.
  53. Honan M, Feng X, Tricarico JM, Kebreab E. Feed additives as a strategic approach to reduce enteric methane production in cattle: Modes of action, effectiveness and safety. Anim Prod Sci. 2021;61(7):699–707. doi: 10.1071/AN20295.
  54. Neethirajan S, Kemp B. Digital livestock farming. Sens Bio-Sensing Res. 2021;32:100408. doi: 10.1016/j.sbsr.2021.100408.
  55. Mandal A, Majumder A, Dhaliwal SS, Toor AS, Mani PK, Naresh RK, et al. Impact of agricultural management practices on soil carbon sequestration and its monitoring through simulation models and remote sensing techniques: A review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2022;52(1):1–49. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2020.1811590.
  56. Li T, Cui L, Wu Y, McLaren TI, Xia A, Pandey R, et al. Soil organic carbon estimation via remote sensing and machine learning techniques: Global topic modeling and research trend exploration. Remote Sens. 2024;16(17):3168. doi: 10.3390/rs16173168.
  57. Belanche A, Bannink A, Dijkstra J, Durmic Z, Garcia F, Santos FG, et al. Feed additives for methane mitigation: A guideline to uncover the mode of action of antimethanogenic feed additives for ruminants. J Dairy Sci. 2025;108(1):375–394. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-25046.
  58. Chel A, Kaushik G. Renewable energy for sustainable agriculture. Agron Sustain Dev. 2011;31(1):91–118. doi: 10.1051/agro/2010029.
  59. Majeed Y, Khan MU, Waseem M, Zahid U, Mahmood F, Majeed F, et al. Renewable energy as an alternative source for energy management in agriculture. Energy Rep. 2023;10:344–359. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.06.032.
  60. Wang F, Harindintwali JD, Yuan Z, Wang M, Wang F, Li S, et al. Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality. Innov (Camb). 2021;2(4):100180. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100180.
  61. Jensen TA, Antille DL, Tullberg JN. Improving on-farm energy use efficiency by optimizing machinery operations and management: A review. Agric Res. 2025;14:15–33. doi: 10.1007/s40003-024-00824-5.
  62. Alemu A, Zewide I. Review on rehabilitation of degraded lands. Br J Earth Sci Res. 2021;9(2):38–62. doi: 10.37745/bjesr.2013.
  63. Abdelhak M. Soil improvement in arid and semiarid regions for sustainable development. In: Natural Resources Conservation and Advances for Sustainability. Elsevier; 2022. pp. 73–90. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822976-7.00026-0.
  64. Morris K, Reich P. Understanding the relationship between livestock grazing and wetland condition. Arthur Rylah Inst Environ Res Tech Rep Ser. 2013;252.
  65. Wu S, Bashir MA, Raza Q-UA, Rehim A, Geng Y, Cao L. Application of riparian buffer zone in agricultural non-point source pollution control—A review. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2023;7:985870. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.985870.
  66. Mant J, Gill AB, Janes M, Hammond D. Restoration of rivers and floodplains. In: J. Van Andel, J, Alonson, editors. Restoration Ecology: The New Frontier. Wiley-Blackwell. Restor Ecol New Front. 2012:214–232.
  67. Kumari G, Saini A, Lakshmi, Sahoo C. Organic and natural farming; Concept and principles. In: Climate Change and Agriculture – Its Impact and Mitigation Potential. Kripa-Drishti Publications; 2024. pp. 193–203.
  68. Légère A, Shirtliffe SJ, Vanasse A, Gulden RH. Extreme grain-based cropping systems: When herbicide-free weed management meets conservation tillage in northern climates. Weed Technol. 2013;27(1):204–211. doi: 10.2307/23358327.
  69. Prajapati SK, Dayal P, Kumar V, Gairola A. Green manuring: A sustainable path to improve soil health and fertility. AgriSustain Int J. 2023;1(2):24–33.
  70. Aasfar A, Bargaz A, Yaakoubi K, Hilali A, Bennis I, Zeroual Y, et al. Nitrogen fixing Azotobacter species as potential soil biological enhancers for crop nutrition and yield stability. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:628379. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.628379.
  71. Lokuge N, Anders S. Carbon-credit systems in agriculture: A review of literature. Sch Public Policy Publ. 2022;15.
  72. Marks AB. (Carbon) farming our way out of climate change. Denver Law Rev. 2020;97(3):497–556.
  73. Sircely J, Nganga I, Temesgen T, Zerfu E. Introduction to multi stakeholder action research for restoration of communal grazing lands. ILRI Res Rep. 2020.
  74. Wang G, Mang S, Cai H, Liu S, Zhang Z, Wang L, et al. Integrated watershed management: Evolution, development and emerging trends. J For Res. 2016;27:967–994. doi: 10.1007/s11676-016-0293-3.
  75. Wolka K, Uma T, Tofu DA. The role of integrated watershed management in climate change adaptation for small-scale farmers in Southwest Ethiopia. Environ Sustain Indic. 2023;19(1):100260. doi: 10.1016/j.indic.2023.100260.
  76. Shelef O, Weisberg PJ, Provenza FD. The value of native plants and local production in an era of global agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:2069. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02069.
  77. Lee-Smith D, Prain G, Cofie O, van Veenhuizen R, Karanja N. Urban and peri-urban farming systems: Feeding cities and enhancing resilience. In: Farming Systems and Food Security in Africa. Routledge; 2019. pp. 504–531. doi: 10.4324/9781315658841-16.
  78. Zajdband AD. Integrated agri-aquaculture systems. In: Genetics, Biofuels and Local Farming Systems 2011;87–127. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1521-9_4.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 14
Issue 03
Received 01/06/2025
Accepted 10/09/2025
Published 11/09/2025
Publication Time 102 Days
53

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics