Shreyas Kundu,
Debjeet Chakraborty,
Koustav Kushary,
Sayan Manna,
- Student, Department of Biotechnology, Haldia Institute of Technology, West Bengal, India
- Student, Department of Biotechnology, Haldia Institute of Technology, West Bengal, India
- Student, Department of Biotechnology, Haldia Institute of Technology, West Bengal, India
- Student, Department of Biotechnology, Haldia Institute of Technology, West Bengal, India
Abstract
Biofuels, derived from renewable biomass sources, offer a promising avenue for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating environmental impact. Among the various approaches to biofuel production, microbial fermentation using microbial consortia has gained significant attention due to its potential for enhancing efficiency and sustainability. Microbial consortia, consisting of diverse populations of microorganisms, exhibit synergistic interactions between different types of microbes that can improve substrate utilization and metabolic robustness compared to single strain as well as multi-strain cultures for fuel production. However, optimizing microbial consortia for biofuel production presents challenges due to the complex metabolic networks and dynamic interactions within consortia. Factors such as substrate availability, environmental conditions, and microbial diversity influence consortia performance. To address these challenges, metabolic engineering offers a systematic approach to design and manipulate microbial consortia for improved biofuel production. This research aims to explore the potential of metabolic engineering strategies in optimizing microbial consortia for enhanced biofuel production. Through experimental techniques, computational modeling, and process optimization, this study seeks to elucidate the underlying mechanisms governing microbial interactions and identify strategies for improving biofuel production efficiency. By advancing our understanding of microbial consortia dynamics and metabolic engineering principles, this research contributes to the development of sustainable and economically viable biofuel production technologies especially in this genre of renewable energy as this is our future to go green. This paper contains a brief and summed-up idea of biofuels derived from the microbes will have a huge impact in this era of sustainable development including its protocol and methodology of metabolic engineering.
Keywords: Biofuel, Sustainable energy, microbes, metabolism, optimization
[This article belongs to Research & Reviews : A Journal of Biotechnology (rrjobt)]
Shreyas Kundu, Debjeet Chakraborty, Koustav Kushary, Sayan Manna. Optimizing Microbial Consortia for Enhanced Biofuel Production: A Metabolic Engineering Approach. Research & Reviews : A Journal of Biotechnology. 2024; 14(01):46-53.
Shreyas Kundu, Debjeet Chakraborty, Koustav Kushary, Sayan Manna. Optimizing Microbial Consortia for Enhanced Biofuel Production: A Metabolic Engineering Approach. Research & Reviews : A Journal of Biotechnology. 2024; 14(01):46-53. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjobt/article=2024/view=143845
Browse Figures
References
1. Jawed K, Yazdani SS, Koffas MA. Advances in the development and application of microbial consortia for metabolic engineering. Metab Eng Commun. 2019;9: e00095. DOI: 10.1016/j.mec.2019.e00095.
2. Roell GW, Zha J, Carr RR, et al. Engineering microbial consortia by division of labor. Microb Cell Fact. 2019;18(1):35. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-019-1083-3.
3. Giri S, Shitut S, Kost C. Harnessing ecological and evolutionary principles to guide the design of microbial production consortia. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2020;62:219–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.12.012.
4. Adegboye MF, Ojuederie OB, Talia PM, et al. Bioprospecting of microbial strains for biofuel production: metabolic engineering, applications, and challenges. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14(1):5. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-020-01853-2.
5. Liu F, Monroe E, Davis RW. Engineering microbial consortia for bioconversion of multisubstrate biomass streams to biofuels. In: Biofuels - Challenges and opportunities. IntechOpen; 2019. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80534.
6. Ibrahim M, Raajaraam L, Raman K. Modeling microbial communities: Harnessing consortia for biotechnological applications. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:3091–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.048.
7. Ergal İ, Bochmann G, Fuchs W, Rittmann SKM. Design and engineering of artificial microbial consortia for biohydrogen production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2022;73:167–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.07.010.
8. Majidian P, Tabatabaei M, Zeinolabedini M, Naghshbandi MP, Chisti Y. Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for biofuel production. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2018;82(Pt 3):4503–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.085.
9. Das M, Patra P, Ghosh A. Metabolic engineering for enhancing microbial biosynthesis of advanced biofuels. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2020;119:109562. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109562.
10. Banerjee C, Dubey KK, Shukla P. Metabolic engineering of microalgal based biofuel production: Prospects and challenges. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:432. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00432.
11. Jang YS, Park JM, Choi S, Choi YJ, Seung DY, Cho JH, et al. Engineering of microorganisms for the production of biofuels and perspectives based on systems metabolic engineering approaches. Biotechnol Adv. 2012;30(5):989–1000. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.015.
12. Gebreslassie BH, Waymire R, You F. Sustainable design and synthesis of algae-based biorefinery for simultaneous hydrocarbon biofuel production and carbon sequestration. AIChE J. 2013;59(5):1599–621. DOI: 10.1002/aic.14075.
13. Peralta-Yahya PP, Keasling JD. Advanced biofuel production in microbes. Biotechnol J. 2010;5(2):147–62. DOI: 10.1002/biot.200900220.
14. Wackett LP. Engineering microbes to produce biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011;22(3):326–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.10.010.
15. Vinuselvi P, Park JM, Lee JM, Oh K, Ghim CM, Lee SK. Engineering microorganisms for biofuel production. Biofuels. 2011;2(2):153–66. DOI: 10.4155/bfs.11.4.
16. Antoni D, Zverlov VV, Schwarz WH. Biofuels from microbes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;77(1):23–35. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-007-1163-x.
17. Henstra AM, Sipma J, Rinzema A, Stams AJM. Microbiology of synthesis gas fermentation for biofuel production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007;18(3):200–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.03.008.
18. Mukhopadhyay A, Redding AM, Rutherford BJ, Keasling JD. Importance of systems biology in engineering microbes for biofuel production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008;19(3):228–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.05.003.
19. Ghim CM, Kim T, Mitchell RJ, Lee SK. Synthetic biology for biofuels: Building designer microbes from the scratch. Biotechnol Bioproc E. 2010;15(1):11–21. DOI: 10.1007/s12257-009-3065-5.
20. Lu H, Yadav V, Zhong M, Bilal M, Taherzadeh MJ, Iqbal HMN. Bioengineered microbial platforms for biomass-derived biofuel production – A review. Chemosphere. 2022;288(Pt 2):132528. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132528.
21. Emad A. Biofuel: Sources, extraction, and determination. In: Liquid, Gaseous and Solid Biofuels - Conversion Techniques. InTech; 2013. DOI: 10.5772/51943.
22. Cabrera-Jiménez R, Mateo-Sanz JM, Gavaldà J, Jiménez L, Pozo C. Comparing biofuels through the lens of sustainability: A data envelopment analysis approach. Appl Energy. 2022;307:118201. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118201.
Research & Reviews : A Journal of Biotechnology
Volume | 14 |
Issue | 01 |
Received | 07/03/2024 |
Accepted | 27/03/2024 |
Published | 20/04/2024 |