A Comprehensive Review on Impact of Natural Selection Leading to Convergence

Year : 2024 | Volume :14 | Issue : 01 | Page : 1-7
By

    Muhammad Kaleem Ullah

  1. Arooj Aslam

  2. Taimor Khalid

  3. Hafiza Rabia Shaifq

  4. Sajid Aslam

  5. Umer Ali

  6. Asad Abbas

  7. Nabila Iqbal

  8. Hussnain Ahmad

  1. Student, Department of Zoology, University of Okara,, Okara, Pakistan
  2. Student, Department of Zoology, University of Okara,, Okara, Pakistan
  3. Student, Department of Zoology, University of Okara,, Okara, Pakistan
  4. Student, Department of Zoology, University of Okara,, Okara, Pakistan
  5. Student, Department of Zoology, University of Okara,, Okara, Pakistan
  6. Student, Dept. of Biological Sciences, Tennessee State University, Nashville, USA
  7. Student, Department of Chemistry, Government College University Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
  8. Student, Department of Zoology, University of Agriculture, Faislabad, Pakistan
  9. Student, Department of Botany university of Agriculture, Fasialabad, Pakistan

Abstract

This tale explores the complex relationship between genetic creativity, adaptation and common ecological problems that is arranged by the master sculptor, natural selection. Convergence reveals the adaptive genius that runs throughout the structure of evolution and is an acknowledgment to the continued power of natural selection. This journey aims to solve the enigma of convergent evolution. Natural selection has been influencing every link in the complex web of life on Earth for more than a century. Understanding the carefully sculpted process of evolution and how life adapts to environmental difficulties was made possible by Charles Darwin’s seminal research. Darwin postulated that the main force behind evolutionary advancement is natural selection. One of the remarkable effects of this process, which depends on individuals reproducing and surviving depending on heritable features, is convergence. The foundation of this fascinating subject is the well-balanced mechanism of natural selection, which promotes features an organism’s chances of survival and reproduction. This is the tale of how natural selection drives convergence through adaptation, genetic innovation, and common ecological problems. In hostile environments like deserts and vast lengths of space, the great sculptor, natural selection, crafts living forms that converge on similar answers to common obstacles. The adaptive genius of convergent evolution demonstrates the continual influence of natural selection on the evolution of life. As we continue to solve the mysteries of convergent evolution, we are setting out on an adventure that will not only deepen our understanding of the past but also help us see the connections between seemingly unrelated species in the vast web of evolution and gain a deeper understanding of how interconnected all life is.

Keywords: Charles Darwin’s theory, Evolutionary pathway, Natural selection, interconnected life, convergence adaptation

[This article belongs to Research & Reviews : A Journal of Biotechnology(rrjobt)]

How to cite this article: Muhammad Kaleem Ullah, Arooj Aslam, Taimor Khalid, Hafiza Rabia Shaifq, Sajid Aslam, Umer Ali, Asad Abbas, Nabila Iqbal, Hussnain Ahmad , A Comprehensive Review on Impact of Natural Selection Leading to Convergence rrjobt 2024; 14:1-7
How to cite this URL: Muhammad Kaleem Ullah, Arooj Aslam, Taimor Khalid, Hafiza Rabia Shaifq, Sajid Aslam, Umer Ali, Asad Abbas, Nabila Iqbal, Hussnain Ahmad , A Comprehensive Review on Impact of Natural Selection Leading to Convergence rrjobt 2024 {cited 2024 Mar 30};14:1-7. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjobt/article=2024/view=136960


Browse Figures

References

1. Ryan F. Darwin’s blind spot: evolution beyond natural selection: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; 2002.
2. Richards RJ. Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary theories of mind and behavior: University of Chicago Press; 1987.
3. Bennett CJ. What is policy convergence and what causes it? British journal of political science. 1991;21[2]:215-33.
4. McGhee GR. Convergent evolution: limited forms most beautiful: MIT press; 2011.
5. Darwin L. Natural selection. The Eugenics Review. 1927;18[4]:285.
6. Futuyma DJ, Moreno G. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annual review of Ecology and Systematics. 1988;19[1]:207-33.
7. Bird RJ. Chaos and life: Complexity and order in evolution and thought: Columbia University Press; 2003.
8. Buller DJ. Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature: MIT press; 2006.
9. Dieckmann U, Ferrière R. Adaptive dynamics and evolving biodiversity. 2004.
10. Sayyed K, Rao SM, Bharate A. EXPLORING EARTH’S TERRESTRIAL BIOMES. VOLUME II. 2023:92.
11. Mayr E. Behavior programs and evolutionary strategies: Natural selection sometimes favors a genetically” closed” behavior program, sometimes an” open” one. American scientist. 1974;62[6]:650-9.
12. Steiner SM. Healing: Crucible Birth: University Press of America; 2005.
13. O’Hara RJ. Telling the tree: narrative representation and the study of evolutionary history. Biology and Philosophy. 1992;7:135-60.
14. BOYD B. On the Origins of Comics. Sunypress edu. 2010;8.
15. Cortinovis G, Frascarelli G, Di Vittori V, Papa R. Current state and perspectives in population genomics of the common bean. Plants. 2020;9[3]:330.
16. Smith CR, Toth AL, Suarez AV, Robinson GE. Genetic and genomic analyses of the division of labour in insect societies. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2008;9[10]:735-48.
17. Agrawal AA. Toward a predictive framework for convergent evolution: integrating natural history, genetic mechanisms, and consequences for the diversity of life. The American Naturalist. 2017;190[S1]:S1-S12.
18. Grime JP, Pierce S. The evolutionary strategies that shape ecosystems: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
19. Yang L, Li P, Qian S, Quan H, Miao J, Liu M, et al. Path Planning Technique for Mobile Robots: A Review. Machines. 2023;11[10]:980.
20. Kutschera U. Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species, directional selection, and the evolutionary sciences today. Naturwissenschaften. 2009;96:1247-63.
21. Jablonka E, Lamb MJ. Evolution in four dimensions, revised edition: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life: MIT press; 2014.
22. Boyd R, Richerson PJ, Henrich J. The cultural niche: Why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108[supplement_2]:10918-25.
23. Fulmer CA, Ostroff C. Convergence and emergence in organizations: An integrative framework and review. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2016;37:S122-S45.
24. Ackerly DD. Community assembly, niche conservatism, and adaptive evolution in changing environments. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2003;164[S3]:S165-S84.
25. Mitchell-Olds T, Willis JH, Goldstein DB. Which evolutionary processes influence natural genetic variation for phenotypic traits? Nature Reviews Genetics. 2007;8[11]:845-56.
26. Losos JB. Convergence, adaptation, and constraint. Evolution. 2011;65[7]:1827-40.
27. Porter ME. Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial analysts journal. 1980;36[4]:30-41.
28. Salamin N, Wüest RO, Lavergne S, Thuiller W, Pearman PB. Assessing rapid evolution in a changing environment. Trends in ecology & evolution. 2010;25[12]:692-8.
29. Ricklefs RE. History and diversity: explorations at the intersection of ecology and evolution. The American Naturalist. 2007;170[S2]:S56-S70.
30. Seehausen O, Takimoto G, Roy D, Jokela J. Speciation reversal and biodiversity dynamics with hybridization in changing environments. Molecular ecology. 2008;17[1]:30-44.
31. Cox CB, Moore PD, Ladle RJ. Biogeography: an ecological and evolutionary approach: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
32. Birch J. Natural selection and the maximization of fitness. Biological Reviews. 2016;91[3]:712-27.
33. Rosenblum EB, Parent CE, Brandt EE. The molecular basis of phenotypic convergence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2014;45:203-26.
34. Gehring WJ. The evolution of vision. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology. 2014;3[1]:1-40.
35. Stern DL. The genetic causes of convergent evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2013;14[11]:751-64.
36. Cooper KL, Tabin CJ. Understanding of bat wing evolution takes flight. Genes & Development. 2008;22[2]:121-4.
37. Swartz SM, Middleton KM. Biomechanics of the bat limb skeleton: scaling, material properties and mechanics. Cells Tissues Organs. 2007;187[1]:59-84.
38. Petit F, Sears KE, Ahituv N. Limb development: a paradigm of gene regulation. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2017;18[4]:245-58.
39. Hu Y, Sanders JG, Łukasik P, D’Amelio CL, Millar JS, Vann DR, et al. Herbivorous turtle ants obtain essential nutrients from a conserved nitrogen-recycling gut microbiome. Nature Communications. 2018;9[1]:964.
40. Anderson SC, Ruxton GD. The evolution of flight in bats: a novel hypothesis. Mammal Review. 2020;50[4]:426-39.
41. Hedenström A, Johansson LC. Bat flight: aerodynamics, kinematics and flight morphology. The Journal of experimental biology. 2015;218[5]:653-63.
42. Stayton CT. What does convergent evolution mean? The interpretation of convergence and its implications in the search for limits to evolution. Interface focus. 2015;5[6]:20150039.
43. Begon M, Townsend CR. Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems: John Wiley & Sons; 2021.
44. Merilaita S, Scott-Samuel NE, Cuthill IC. How camouflage works. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2017;372[1724]:20160341.
45. Pembury Smith MQ, Ruxton GD. Camouflage in predators. Biological Reviews. 2020;95[5]:1325-40.
46. Zimova M, Mills LS, Nowak JJ. High fitness costs of climate change‐induced camouflage mismatch. Ecology letters. 2016;19[3]:299-307.
47. Cody ML, Diamond JM. Ecology and evolution of communities: Harvard University Press; 1975.
48. Alexander DE. On the wing: insects, pterosaurs, birds, bats and the evolution of animal flight: Oxford University Press, USA; 2015.
49. Savile D. Adaptive evolution in the avian wing. Evolution. 1957:212-24.
50. Thompson JN. Relentless evolution: University of Chicago Press; 2013.
51. Lamichhaney S, Card DC, Grayson P, Tonini JF, Bravo GA, Näpflin K, et al. Integrating natural history collections and comparative genomics to study the genetic architecture of convergent evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2019;374[1777]:20180248.
52. Roth G. Convergent evolution of complex brains and high intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015;370[1684]:20150049.
53. Mikhalevich I, Powell R, Logan C. Is behavioural flexibility evidence of cognitive complexity? How evolution can inform comparative cognition. Interface focus. 2017;7[3]:20160121.
54. Perkins D. 15 The possibility of invention. The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. 1988:362.
55. Römer L, Scheibel T. The elaborate structure of spider silk: structure and function of a natural high performance fiber. Prion. 2008;2[4]:154-61.
56. Nordmann A. Converging technologies: shaping the future of European societies: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg; 2004.

Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 14
Issue 01
Received March 8, 2024
Accepted March 15, 2024
Published March 30, 2024
Views: 54