Review on Comparative Analysis of Lateral Load Response of UG+G+7 Building Using Shear Wall, Bracing and Moment Resisting Frame Systems

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2026 | Volume : 13 | 02 | Page :
    By

    Sawane Shraddha Nagorao,

  • Prof. Rohit S. Gunjal,

  1. M. Tech Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Chh.Shahu College of Engineering. Chh. Sambhajinagar, maharastra, india
  2. Assistant Professor, Department Of Civil Engineering,Chh. Shahu College of Engineering. Chh. Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

This review paper provides a relative analysis of lateral load-resisting systems in multi-storey buildings, specifically focusing on high-rise structural configuration. The study synthesizes findings from research Papers to evaluate the performance of shear wall systems, bracing systems, and moment-resisting frame systems under seismic and wind loading conditions. With the rising requirement for safe and efficient urban structures, understanding the behavior of different structural systems under lateral loads has become essential.The reviewed literature highlights that shear wall systems provide high stiffness and effectively reduce storey displacement and inter-storey drift, making them suitable for earthquake-prone regions. Bracing systems enhance energy dissipation and structural structural balance while offering economical advantages. In contrast, moment-resisting frames provide flexibility and architectural freedom but tend to exhibit higher lateral deformation. Several studies also emphasize the influence of soil–structure interaction and damping mechanisms on overall structural response.Furthermore, the review identifies key research gaps, including limited studies on combined vertical and plan irregularities, insufficient consideration of multi-hazard effects, and lack of system-level performance-based evaluation. These gaps indicate the need for comprehensive relative studies under uniform modeling conditions.This paper intends to provide a clear understanding of the advantages and limitations of different lateral load-resisting systems and to assist engineers in selecting appropriate structural configurations for UG+G+7 buildings. The findings contribute to improving structural safety, performance, and design efficiency.

Keywords: High-rise building, Lateral load response, Shear wall, Bracing system, Seismic analysis

How to cite this article:
Sawane Shraddha Nagorao, Prof. Rohit S. Gunjal. Review on Comparative Analysis of Lateral Load Response of UG+G+7 Building Using Shear Wall, Bracing and Moment Resisting Frame Systems. Journal of Structural Engineering and Management. 2026; 13(02):-.
How to cite this URL:
Sawane Shraddha Nagorao, Prof. Rohit S. Gunjal. Review on Comparative Analysis of Lateral Load Response of UG+G+7 Building Using Shear Wall, Bracing and Moment Resisting Frame Systems. Journal of Structural Engineering and Management. 2026; 13(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/josem/article=2026/view=246144


References

  1. Perkovic N, Bedon C, Barbalic J, Rajcic V. Study of fire resilience challenges to promote the structural use of load-bearing composite timber-glass walls. Fire Technol. 2025;61:3263-3291.
  2. Teymur P. The effect of soil improvement on the structural response of a retrofitted building with shotcrete panels. Arabian J Sci Eng. 2025.
  3. Aslani M, Tehrani P. Seismic response and collapse capacity assessment of dual RC buildings with vertical irregularities in shear walls. Sci Rep. 2025;15.
  4. Sharma KK, Imam A, Kumar P, Olaiya BC. Displacement-based seismic fragility assessment of a high-rise reinforced concrete building. Sci Rep. 2025;15.
  5. Sayyed ATA, Tanawade SB. Seismic performance of bracing and shear wall in high-rise building along with different types of soil. Int J Creat Res Thoughts. 2025;13(6):f273-f280.
  6. Zhao X, Ding JM. Wind-resistant structural design of super-tall buildings. J Struct Eng. 2025.
  7. Cheng Y. Seismic behavior of shear wall systems in high-rise buildings. Eng Struct. 2025.
  8. Uysal Y. Effect of shear wall ratio on seismic performance. Structures. 2025.
  9. Wenzel A, Vera S, Guindos P. Energy and structural optimization of mid-rise light-frame timber buildings. Eur J Wood Wood Prod. 2024;82:967-982.
  10. Mansour AS, Hosseini SA, Toulabi HM. Evaluation of blast-induced progressive collapse in steel structures. J Eng Appl Sci. 2024;71.
  11. Fujii K. Seismic capacity evaluation of reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames with steel damper columns. Front Built Environ. 2024;10.
  12. de Lima DM, Silva WWN, López-Yánez PA, Medeiros IS. Analysis and structural design of multi-storey composite steel and concrete buildings. Discov Civ Eng. 2024;1.
  13. Liu J. Application of outrigger and belt truss systems in high-rise buildings. J Struct Eng. 2024.
  14. Kim KH. Performance of hybrid shear wall and bracing systems in high-rise buildings. Eng Struct. 2024.
  15. Patel S, Mehta R. Effect of wind and seismic loads on multi-storey buildings. Int J Civ Eng. 2024.
  16. Dushimimana A, Dushimimana C, Mbereyaho L, Niyonsenga AA. Effects of building height and seismic load on base isolation system. Arabian J Sci Eng. 2023;48:13283-13302.
  17. Osman A, Farouk AE. The use of steel X-bracing combined with shear link to upgrade RC frames. J Eng Appl Sci. 2023;70.
  18. Kontoni DPN, Farghaly AA. Enhancing earthquake resistance of high-rise buildings using bracings, shear walls and TMDs. Asian J Civ Eng. 2023;24:2595-2608.
  19. Algamati M, Al-Sakkaf A, Abdelkader EM, Bagchi A. Studying and analyzing the seismic performance of concrete moment-resisting frame buildings. CivilEng. 2023;4:34-54.
  20. Shukla K, Nallasivam K. Dynamic response of high-rise buildings with shear walls due to seismic forces. 2023.
  21. Singh M, Gupta A. Seismic performance of vertically irregular buildings. Int J Struct Eng. 2023.
  22. Sharma R, Verma P. Use of dampers in high-rise buildings for seismic control. J Struct Eng. 2023.
  23. Khan A, Hussain M. Effect of soil-structure interaction on seismic response of buildings. Int J Civ Eng. 2023.
  24. Dynamic response of multi-storey building with shear wall. Int J Res Eng Sci Manag. 2021;4(4):38-42.
  25. Jain AK, Sharma BK. Comparative study of diagrid and conventional systems. Int J Struct Eng. 2021.
  26. Kulkarni PB, Patil MR. Effect of bracing systems on seismic performance. Int J Eng Res. 2021.
  27. Patil RS, Jadhav SS. Influence of soil-structure interaction on seismic response. Int J Civ Eng. 2021.
  28. Singh VP, Verma RK. Combined effect of wind and seismic loads on high-rise buildings. Int J Struct Eng. 2021.
Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume 13
02
Received 05/05/2026
Accepted 27/05/2026
Published 29/05/2026
Publication Time 24 Days
18

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics