Evaluation of Shear Walls and Bracings in Irregular Buildings Under Seismic Load

Year : 2025 | Volume : 12 | Issue : 02 | Page : 22 28
    By

    Sangram Mule,

  • C.P. Pise,

  • A.A. Kamble,

Abstract

The structural integrity and stability of irregular buildings under lateral forces such as wind and seismic loads pose significant challenges in modern construction practices. Irregularities in a building & geometry and mass distribution can lead to uneven force distribution, making the structure more vulnerable to lateral displacement and potential failure. To enhance the resilience of such structures, shear walls and bracing systems are commonly employed to improve lateral load resistance. This study conducts a comparative analysis of shear walls and different types of bracing systems, focusing on their effectiveness in minimizing lateral displacement, reducing base shear, and enhancing overall structural stiffness. Using numerical modeling and finite element analysis, the research evaluates various configurations and placements of shear walls and bracings in irregular buildings. The study aims to identify the most efficient structural system for optimizing building performance under different wind and seismic loading conditions. The results provide valuable insights into the behavior of irregular buildings with shear walls and bracings, helping engineers and architects select the most suitable structural design to ensure safety, stability, and cost-effectiveness. The findings can contribute to the development of improved construction guidelines and design standards for irregular high-rise and mid-rise buildings in earthquake-prone and high-wind regions.

Keywords: Shear wall, bracing system, irregular buildings, wind load, seismic load, structural stability, lateral load resistance, base shear, structural stiffness, numerical modeling, earthquake- resistant design, high-rise buildings, structural optimization

[This article belongs to Journal of Structural Engineering and Management ]

How to cite this article:
Sangram Mule, C.P. Pise, A.A. Kamble. Evaluation of Shear Walls and Bracings in Irregular Buildings Under Seismic Load. Journal of Structural Engineering and Management. 2025; 12(02):22-28.
How to cite this URL:
Sangram Mule, C.P. Pise, A.A. Kamble. Evaluation of Shear Walls and Bracings in Irregular Buildings Under Seismic Load. Journal of Structural Engineering and Management. 2025; 12(02):22-28. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/josem/article=2025/view=213735


References

1. Nepal S, Saitoh M. Improving the performance of conventional base isolation systems by an
external variable negative stiffness device under near-fault and long-period ground motions.
Earthq Eng Eng Vib. 2020;19(4):793–809.
2. Kasimzade AA, Abrar O, Atmaca G, Kuruoglu M. New structural seismic protection for high-rise
building structures. Structures. 2020;24:48–62.
3. Zheng XW, Li HN, Gardoni P. Reliability-based design approach for high-rise buildings subject
to earthquakes and strong winds. Eng Struct. 2024;296:116519.
4. Lingeshwaran N, Nadimpalli SK, Sailaja K, Sameeruddin S, Kumar YH, Madavarapu SB. A
study on seismic analysis of high-rise building with and without floating columns and shear wall.
Mater Today Proc. 2021;45(2):1256–60.
5. Nugroho NY, Triyadi S, Wonorahardjo S. Effect of high-rise buildings on the surrounding
thermal environment. Build Environ. 2020;185:107292.
6. Feng P, Xingkuan W. Sustainable development of high-rise buildings. Proc Int Conf Green
Buildings Sustain Cities. 2020;1:168–73.
7. Breus EA, Favorskaya A, Golubev V, Kozhemyachenko A, Petrov I. Investigation of seismic
stability of high-rising buildings using heritage in the “Internet Plus”. Procedia Comput Sci.
2020;168:320–7.
8. Al Musbahi S, Güngör A. A composite building isolation system for earthquake protection. Eng
Sci Technol Int J. 2018;21(6):1231–41.
9. Al Agha W, Almorad WA, Umamaheswari N, Alhelwani A. Study on the seismic response of
reinforced concrete high-rise building with dual frame-shear wall system considering soil-
structure interaction. Mater Today Proc. 2021;46(2):7940–5.

10. Stops H, Thorneycroft C, Touchie MF, Zimmermann N, Hamilton I, Kesik T. High-rise
residential building makeovers: Improving renovation quality in the United Kingdom and Canada
through systemic analysis. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2021;75:102013.
11. Ji X, Liu D, Molina Hutt C. Seismic performance evaluation of a high-rise building with novel
hybrid coupled walls. Eng Struct. 2018;165:39–53.
12. Cancellara D, De Angelis F. A base isolation system for structures subject to extreme seismic
events characterized by anomalous values of intensity and frequency content. Compos Struct.
2016;152:1015–27.
13. Mhashakhetri AR, Mahajan SK. Effect of base isolation system on seismic response of a RC
building – A numerical study. Int J Eng Res Technol (IJERT). 2016;5(5):456–61.
14. Naderpour H, Naji N, Burkacki D, Jankowski R. Seismic response of high-rise buildings
equipped with base isolation and non-traditional tuned mass dampers. Materials.
2019;12(7):1081.
15. Al Amin, Islam M, Ahamed MJ. Base isolation of multi-storied building using lead rubber
bearing. J Eng Technol Ind Appl. 2020;2(12):10–5.
16. Popa M, Kiss Z, Constantinescu H, Bolca G. Designing a 40-storey high office building using two
variants: Regular concrete columns and compound ultra-high-performance concrete columns.
Procedia Manuf. 2015;22:905–10.
17. Ahmad T, Aibinu AA, Thaheem MJ. Effects of high-rise residential construction on sustainability
of housing systems. Procedia Eng. 2020;180:1133–42.
18. Chang CM, Shia S, Yang CY. Design of buildings with seismic isolation using linear quadratic
algorithm. Proc 10th Int Conf Struct Dyn EURODYN. 2017;2:2483–91.
19. Mahmoud S. Horizontally connected high-rise buildings under earthquake loadings. Ain Shams
Eng J. 2019;10(4):931–40.
20. Sarda M, Deshpande B, Deo S, Karanjkar R. A comparative study on Maslow’s theory and Indian
Ashrama system. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng. 2018;8(2):48–50.
21. Deo S, Deo S. Cybersquatting: Threat to domain name. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng.
2019;8(6):1432–4.
22. Deo S, Deo DS. Domain name and its protection in India. Int J Recent Technol Eng.
2019;8(2S):533–6.
23. Sarda M, Deshpande B, Deo S, Pathak MA. Intellectual property and mechanical engineering:
Emphasizing the importance of knowledge of intellectual property rights among mechanical
engineers. Int J Soc Sci Econ Res. 2018;3(12):6591–6.
24. Deo SS. Protection of good Samaritans: A study in light of Supreme Court’s decision in Save Life
Foundation case. Int J Law. 2016;2(6):12–3.
25. Sawant RA, Mulani AO. Automatic PCB track design machine. Int J Innov Sci Res Technol.
2022;7(9):753–7.
26. Abhangrao MR, et al. Design and implementation of 8-bit Vedic multiplier. Int J Res Publ Eng
Technol. 2017;3(5):12–5.
27. Gadade B, et al. IoT based smart school bus and student monitoring system. Nat Campano.
2024;28(1):730–7.
28. Mulani AO. A comprehensive survey on semi-automatic solar-powered pesticide sprayers for
farming. J Energy Eng Thermodyn (JEET). 2024;4(1):95–100.
29. Salunkhe SS, et al. Solar mount design using high-density polyethylene. Nat Campano.
2024;28(1):738–43.

Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 12
Issue 02
Received 21/03/2025
Accepted 26/04/2025
Published 30/04/2025
Publication Time 40 Days
209

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics