Enhancing Production Line Efficiency: Simulating and Optimizing Single and Parallel Line Processes

Year : 2025 | Volume : 15 | Issue : 01 | Page : 22-32
    By

    Arunesh Mishra,

  • Rahul Rajput,

  • Amit Sharma,

  • Arvind Gwatiya,

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, RKDF University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, RKDF University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  3. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vedica Institute of Technology, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  4. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vedica Institute of Technology, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract

document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_193624’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

During a time of fast-paced industrial growth, increasing production line effectiveness is a core issue for manufacturers looking to maximize output, reduce waste, and stay competitive. This study explores the use of simulation-based optimization methods to enhance single and parallel production line designs. Stepping beyond traditional trial-and-error methods, the research utilizes Siemens Tecnomatix Plant Simulation to simulate actual manufacturing scenarios, considering intricacies like buffer capacities, machine sequencing, and event-driven scheduling. Substantial gains in performance were made by applying optimized parallel line layouts, notably a 24% gain in throughput, 829 to 1,032 units, testifying to the real payback of strategic line-of-production optimization. Such outcomes attest to the merits of forward-looking scenario planning and dynamic allocation of resources based on lean manufacturing philosophy and for delivering on the essence of Industry 4.0. At the center of this strategy are simulation methods like Discrete Event Simulation (DES), System Dynamics (SD), and Agent-Based Modeling (ABM), each with unique strengths based on the complexity and character of the production setting. The study also assesses commonly adopted simulation software like Arena, Simul8, and FlexSim, focusing on their strengths in modeling, performance analysis, and scenario assessment. Concurrently, assorted optimization methods like line balancing, genetic algorithms, and hybrid scheduling models are investigated to optimize workflow distribution and increase system productivity. Visual aids like bottleneck analyzers and Gantt charts also assist decision-making by providing transparent, fact-based insights into system performance. Finally, the research emphasizes that simulation is not only a forecast tool but a strategic tool for designing agile, scalable, and lean production systems. When paired with smart planning paradigms and real-time production feedback, simulation enables organizations to break free from conventional manufacturing limitations and progress toward more adaptive, intelligent manufacturing solutions.

Keywords: Manufacturing optimization, plant simulation, Tecnomatix, parallel and single line processes, production efficiency, and simulation

[This article belongs to Journal of Production Research & Management ]

How to cite this article:
Arunesh Mishra, Rahul Rajput, Amit Sharma, Arvind Gwatiya. Enhancing Production Line Efficiency: Simulating and Optimizing Single and Parallel Line Processes. Journal of Production Research & Management. 2025; 15(01):22-32.
How to cite this URL:
Arunesh Mishra, Rahul Rajput, Amit Sharma, Arvind Gwatiya. Enhancing Production Line Efficiency: Simulating and Optimizing Single and Parallel Line Processes. Journal of Production Research & Management. 2025; 15(01):22-32. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joprm/article=2025/view=0


document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_193624’);});Edit

References

  1. Werner Parallel processing strategies for big geospatial data. Front Big Data. 2019; 2: 44. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00044.
  2. Lusa A survey of the literature on the multiple or parallel assembly line balancing problem. Eur J Ind Eng. 2008; 2(1): 50–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2008.016329.
  3. Freitas AA, Lavington SH, Freitas AA, Lavington S Basic concepts on parallel processing. In: Mining Very Large Databases with Parallel Processing. Boston, MA: Springer; 2000; 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5521-6_7.
  4. Fowler JW, Mönch A survey of scheduling with parallel batch (p-batch) processing. Eur J Oper Res. 2022; 298(1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.012.
  5. Fischer R, Plessow Efficient multitasking: Parallel versus serial processing of multiple tasks. Front Psychol. 2015; 6: 1366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01366.
  6. Nassi JJ, Callaway E Parallel processing strategies of the primate visual system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(5): 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2619.
  7. Garcia EF, Zúñiga ER, Bruch J, Moris MU, Syberfeldt Simulation-based optimization for facility layout design in conditions of high uncertainty. Procedia CIRP. 2018; 72: 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.227.
  8. Kordaczek R, Piłat A Prototype and Simulation Model of a Robotic Hand. In 2020 IEEE International Conference Mechatronic Systems and Materials (MSM). 2020 Jul; 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSM49833.2020.9201741.
  9. Janeková J, Fabianová J, Kádárová Optimization of the Automated Production Process Using Software Simulation Tools. Processes. 2023; 11(2): 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020509.
  10. Mahdi Mohammad, Rise Zeinab, Anvariazar Improving Production Line Performance through Simulation and Bottleneck Analysis using AnyLogic Software. 20th International Conference of Modern Research in Management, Economics and Development. 2024; 1–10.
  11. Yegul MF, Erenay FS, Striepe S, Yavuz Improving configuration of complex production lines via simulation-based optimization. Comput Ind Eng. 2017; 109: 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
    cie.2017.04.019.
  12. Choi H, Yu S, Lee D, Noh SD, Ji S, Kim H, Yoon H, Kwon M, Han Optimization of the Factory Layout and Production Flow Using Production-Simulation-Based Reinforcement Learning. Machines. 2024; 12(6): 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines12060390.
  13. Quadras D, Frazzon EM, Mendes LG, Pires MC, Rodriguez C Adaptive Simulation-Based Optimization for Production Scheduling: A Comparative Study. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2022; 55(10): 424–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.430.
  14. Zhu L, Zhang Z, Guan Multi-objective partial parallel disassembly line balancing problem using hybrid group neighbourhood search algorithm. J Manuf Syst. 2020; 56: 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.013.
  15. Coutinho DA, Georgiou K, Eder KI, Nunez-Yanez J, Xavier-de-Souza S. Performance and Energy Efficiency Trade-Offs in Single-ISA Heterogeneous Multi-Processing for Parallel Applications. In 2019 IFIP/IEEE 27th International Conference on Very Large-Scale Integration (VLSI-SoC). 2019; 232–233. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092409.
  16. Ahmed R, Doyley M Parallel receive beamforming improves the performance of focused transmit-based single-track location shear wave elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2020; 67(10): 2057–2068. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2020.2998979.
  17. Balaji V, Lucia Combining data duplication and graph reordering to accelerate parallel graph processing. In Proceedings of the 28th International symposium on high-performance parallel and distributed computing. 2019; 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3307681.3326609.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 15
Issue 01
Received 14/05/2025
Accepted 24/05/2025
Published 10/06/2025
Publication Time 27 Days
104

[first_name] [last_name]

My IP

PlumX Metrics