This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.
Santosh Kumar. K,
V. Ajay Kumar,
T. Nagaveni,
K. Saraswathamma,
- Research Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College of Engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
- Research Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College of Engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
- Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College of Engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
- Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College of Engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Abstract
3D Cf/SiC composites, consisting of carbon fibers reinforced with silicon carbide are increasingly used in aerospace and defence due to their excellent mechanical properties and high-temperature strength. However, their heterogeneous, anisotropic, and abrasive nature makes them difficult to machine, resulting in accelerated tool degradation and poor surface integrity. This study explores the dry milling performance of 3D Cf/SiC composites using polycrystalline diamond (PCD) and cubic boron nitride (CBN) cutting tools. Initially the wear behaviour of the two tool materials was compared at different machining times. Machining temperature, surface roughness and flank wear were evaluated using thermal imaging and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). PCD demonstrated superior cutting-edge integrity and lower wear than CBN, confirming its suitability for dry machining. PCD milling experiments were subsequently conducted at spindle speeds of 2500, 2750 and 3000 rpm and feed rates of 1800, 2000 and 2200 mm/min, with a constant depth of cut of 0.1 mm. Regression analysis showed that spindle speed had a stronger influence on machining temperature, with the temperature model achieving an R² value of 96.99%, whereas feed rate was the dominant factor affecting surface roughness, with an R² value of 93.51%. Surface roughness increased with increasing feed rate, while higher spindle speed resulted in improved surface finish. Particle Swarm Optimization identified 3000 rpm and 1800 mm/min as the optimum condition, with a predicted minimum surface roughness of 2.323 µm. Flank wear varied with machining conditions, with minimum wear observed at 2750 rpm and 1800 mm/min.
Keywords: 3D Cf/SiC composites, Dry milling, PCD tool, Surface roughness, Tool wear.
References
1. Diaz, O. G., Luna, G. G., Liao, Z., & Axinte, D. (2019). The new challenges of machining Ceramic Matrix Composites (CMCs): Review of surface integrity. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 139, 24-36.
2. Ramaguru, G., Nagaveni, T., Ramesh Bhagat, A., & Saraswathamma, K. (2026). Investigation of hole morphology and tool wear in 3D pierce-fabric carbon/carbon composites during drilling. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 1-13.
3. Feng, P., Wang, J., Zhang, J., & Zheng, J. (2017). Drilling induced tearing defects in rotary ultrasonic machining of C/SiC composites. Ceramics International, 43(1), 791-799.
4. Gao, Y., Zha, B. L., Wang, J. J., Sun, Z. S., Zhang, Z. F., & Shi, Y. A. (2022). Ablation mechanism of C/C–SiC and C/C–SiC–ZrC composites in hypersonic oxygen-enriched environment. Ceramics International, 48(16), 22985-22993.
5. Kang, R., Ma, H., Wang, Z., Dong, Z., & Bao, Y. (2023). Effect of tool wear on machining quality in milling Cf/SiC composites with PCD tool. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 105, 370-385.
6. Du, J., Zhang, H., Geng, Y., Ming, W., He, W., Ma, J., … & Liu, K. (2019). A review on machining of carbon fiber reinforced ceramic matrix composites. Ceramics International, 45(15), 18155-18166.
7. Nian, Z., Zhao, G., Zhu, L., Yang, H., & Li, L. (2025). Machining-induced damage in milling of Cf/SiC composites: mechanisms and evaluation methods. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 109322.
8. Diaz, O. G., Luna, G. G., Liao, Z., & Axinte, D. (2019). The new challenges of machining Ceramic Matrix Composites (CMCs): Review of surface integrity. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 139, 24-36.
9. Choudhary, A., Chakladar, N. D., & Paul, S. (2021). Identification and estimation of defects in high-speed ground C/SiC ceramic matrix composites. Composite Structures, 261, 113274.
10. Rösiger, A., Goller, R., Langhof, N., & Krenkel, W. (2021). Influence of in-plane and out-of-plane machining on the surface topography, the removal mechanism and the flexural strength of 2D C/C-SiC composites. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 41(5), 3108-3119.
11. Jiang, J., Zhao, W., Sun, T., Cheng, F., Xie, L., & Wang, X. (2024). Performance and wear mechanisms of polycrystalline diamond tools with different diamond grains in milling Cf/SiC composites. Wear, 546, 205355.
12. Nian, Z., Zhao, G., Xin, L., Zhu, L., Yang, H., & Li, L. (2024). Cutting performance and tool wear mechanism of corrugated helical PCD tool in milling Cf/SiC composites. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 134(7), 3417-3432.
13. Zan, Z., Sun, J., Bi, K., Guo, K., Hong, Y., Sivalingam, V., & Xi, J. (2024). Investigation of milling performance and removal process mechanism of 3D SiCf/C-SiC composites using brazed diamond tools. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 44(6), 3588-3601.
14. Song, X., Zhao, G., Xia, H., Nian, Z., Wan, Y., & Li, L. (2023). Cutting performance and wear behavior of diamond, coated cemented carbide and PCBN tools during milling of Cf/SiC composites. Diamond and Related Materials, 140, 110473.
15. Kang, R., Ma, H., Wang, Z., Dong, Z., & Bao, Y. (2023). Effect of tool wear on machining quality in milling Cf/SiC composites with PCD tool. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 105, 370-385.
Journal of Polymer & Composites
| Volume | 14 | |
| 05 | ||
| Received | 18/09/2026 | |
| Accepted | 05/10/2026 | |
| Published | 10/10/2026 | |
| Publication Time | 22 Days |