Santosh Takale,
Paresh Patil,
Jineshwar Kapale,
- Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth “Deemed to be University”, Karad, Maharashtra, India
- Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth “Deemed to be University”, Karad, Maharashtra, India
- Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth “Deemed to be University”, Karad, Maharashtra, India
Abstract
The increasing demand for orthopedic implants with enhanced characteristics that are durable, lightweight and compatible with the body’s response has led to the development of polymeric composites incorporating them for load-bearing applications. Commonly used metal implants cause stress shielding, corrosion and lack biological integration. The challenges of the aforementioned problems are overcome by polymeric composites by offering adjustable mechanical properties, radiolucency and the incorporation of bioactive elements. Advances in high-performance polymers and synthetic and natural reinforcements have resulted in composites with bone-like strength and fatigue life and biocompatibility. Fiber reinforced systems, particulate filled systems, nanocomposite systems and hybrid systems each offer advantages in the areas of tunable stiffness, advanced impact resistance, reduced wear and enhanced osteoconductive. Adding bioactive fillers and engineered surfaces enhances osseointegration and antibacterial effect addressing the issue of stability and infection. Additive manufacturing helps to tailor microarchitecture for patient-specific implants in which localized reinforcement is allowed. Yet there remain challenges in terms of long-term durability, matrix-reinforcement interfaces and manufacturing consistency. This review collates current strategies of reinforcing polymeric composites in load bearing orthopedic implants, material choices, reinforcement mechanisms, structural design, and biological performance. It also looks forward to emerging trends such as multifunctional bio-responsive composites and smart reinforcement systems. By integrating different aspects of materials science, biomechanics and biomedical engineering, the review provides a robust evaluation of polymeric composite reinforcements and the possibilities of changing orthopedic implant technology.
Keywords: Polymeric composites, orthopedic implants, load-bearing materials, fiber reinforcement, nanoparticle reinforcement, hybrid composites, biocompatible polymers, osseointegration, biomechanics, additive manufacturing.
[This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer & Composites (jopc)]
References
1. Ma H, Suonan A, Zhou J, Yuan Q, Liu L, Zhao X, et al. PEEK (polyether-ether-ketone) and its composite materials in orthopedic implantation. Arab J Chem. 2021;14(3):102977.
2. Al-Shalawi FD, Mohamed Ariff AH, Jung DW, Mohd Ariffin MK, Seng Kim CL, Brabazon D, et al. Biomaterials as implants in the orthopedic field for regenerative medicine: Metal versus synthetic polymers. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(12):2601.
3. Senra MR, Marques MFV, Monteiro SN. Poly (ether-ether-ketone) for biomedical applications: From enhancing bioactivity to reinforced-bioactive composites—An overview. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(2):373.
4. Atif M, Shoukat S, Imran M, Alex M. Paradigm shift in orthopedic implants from metals to polymers. Iran Polym J. 2025;34(8):1261–84.
5. Łuczak JW, Palusińska M, Matak D, Pietrzak D, Nakielski P, Lewicki S, et al. The future of bone repair: Emerging technologies and biomaterials in bone regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(23):12766.
6. Gopanna A, Rajan KP, Thomas SP, Chavali M. Polyethylene and polypropylene matrix composites for biomedical applications. In: Grumezescu V, Grumezescu AM, editors. Materials for Biomedical Engineering: Thermoset and Thermoplastic Polymers. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019. p. 175–216.
7. Li S, Chen R, Xu W, Zhang C, Liu G, Wang Q, et al. PEEK-based orthopedic composites and structures for orthopedic repair: A review. Polym Compos. 2025;46(17):15567–83.
8. Al-Shalawi FD, Hanim MA, Ariffin MK, Kim CL, Brabazon D, Calin R, et al. Biodegradable synthetic polymer in orthopaedic application: A review. Mater Today Proc. 2023;74:540–6.
9. Duan X, Wang B, Yang L, Kadakia AR. Applications of 3D printing technology in orthopedic treatment. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:9892456.
10. Bashandeh K, Amiri A, Rafieerad A, Rahman S, Yan W, Dhingra S, et al. MXene-aromatic thermosetting copolyester nanocomposite as an extremely wear-resistant biocompatible implant material for osteoarthritis applications. Appl Surf Sci. 2022;600:154124.
11. Neal MT, Richards AE, Curley KL, Patel NP, Ashman JB, Vora SA, et al. Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK instrumentation in the spinal oncology population: A retrospective series demonstrating technique, feasibility, and clinical outcomes. Neurosurg Focus. 2021;50(5):E13.
12. Chang B, Gu J, Long Z, Li Z, Ruan S, Shen C. Effects of temperature and fiber orientation on the tensile behavior of short carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites. Polym Compos. 2021;42(2):597–607.
13. Choudhury SS, Pandey M, Bhattacharya S. Recent developments in surface modification of PEEK polymer for industrial applications: A critical review. Rev Adhes Adhes. 2021;9(3):410–33.
14. Kabiri A, Liaghat G, Alavi F, Saidpour H, Hedayati SK, Ansari M, et al. Glass fiber/polypropylene composites with potential of bone fracture fixation plates: Manufacturing process and mechanical characterization. J Compos Mater. 2020;54(30):4903–19.
15. Gain AK, Zhang L. Design and characterization of durable glass fibre (GF)-reinforced PLA and PEEK biomaterials. Polymers (Basel). 2025;17(18):2536.
16. Aaliya B, Sunooj KV, Lackner M. Biopolymer composites: A review. Int J Biobased Plast. 2021;3(1):40–84.
17. Lv Q, Li Q, Cao P, Wei C, Li Y, Wang Z, et al. Designing silk biomaterials toward better future healthcare: The development and application of silk-based implantable electronic devices in clinical diagnosis and therapy. Adv Mater. 2025;37(8):2411946.
18. Radulescu DE, Neacsu IA, Grumezescu AM, Andronescu E. Novel trends into the development of natural hydroxyapatite-based polymeric composites for bone tissue engineering. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(5):899.
19. Kargozar S, Mozafari M, Ghenaatgar-Kasbi M, Baino F. Bioactive glasses and glass/polymer composites for neuroregeneration: Should we be hopeful? Appl Sci. 2020;10(10):3421.
20. Wong WK, Lai CH, Cheng WY, Tung LH, Chang RC, Leung FK. Polymer-metal composite healthcare materials: From nano to device scale. J Compos Sci. 2022;6(8):218.
21. Ferrari G, Thives Mello A, Melo G, de Mello Roesler CR, Salmoria GV, de Souza Pinto LP, et al. Polymeric implants with drug-releasing capabilities: A mapping review of laboratory research. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2021;47(10):1535–45.
22. Billings C, Cai C, Liu Y. Utilization of antibacterial nanoparticles in photocurable additive manufacturing of advanced composites for improved public health. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(15):2616.
23. Alimardani Y, Mirzakhani E, Ansari F, Pourjafar H, Sadeghi N. Prospective and applications of bacterial nanocellulose in dentistry. Cellulose. 2024;31(13):7819–39.
24. Srinivas J, Karthikeyan KR, Senthil TS, Yesuraj K, Aultrin KSJ. Characterization of mechanical and viscoelastic properties of ceramic nanoparticle-reinforced polymer composites. J Polym Compos. 2025;13(1):71–82.
25. Kumar A, Jaiswal J, Tsuchiya K, Singh G. Recent advances in polymer-composite materials for biomedical applications. In: Verma A, Gupta HS, Sethi SK, editors. Hybrid composite materials: experimental and theoretical analysis. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2024. p. 153–193.
Journal of Polymer & Composites
| Volume | 14 | |
| Special Issue | 04 | |
| Received | 13/07/2026 | |
| Accepted | 04/08/2026 | |
| Published | 19/08/2026 | |
| Publication Time | 37 Days |