Optimized Utilization of Kota Stone Slurry Waste in Fly Ash–Based Geopolymer Mortar: A Taguchi-Driven Approach

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2026 | Volume : 14 | 03 | Page :
    By

    Pawan Patidar,

  • Pawan Kalla,

  • Pravesh Saini,

  1. Research Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  2. Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  3. Research Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

The large-scale generation of stone-processing wastes presents a critical sustainability challenge and an opportunity for value-added reuse in construction materials. This study develops a high-performance fly ash geopolymer mortar by partially replacing Class F fly ash with Kota stone slurry waste (KSSW) and optimizing the key mix parameters using a Taguchi design framework. Five governing factors—binder replacement level, NaOH molarity, sodium silicate–to–sodium hydroxide ratio (SS/SH), curing temperature, and alkaline solution-to-binder ratio (A/B)—were systematically optimized using ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV; larger-the-better) and water absorption (smaller-the-better) as primary compactness and durability indicators, with strength confirmation. The optimum combination (25% KSSW, 12 M NaOH, SS/SH = 1, curing at 60 °C, A/B = 0.5) achieved a UPV of 4380 m/s (+16.7%) and a minimum water absorption of 3.1% (−63.9%) relative to the control, indicating substantial matrix densification. Correspondingly, compressive and flexural strengths reached 25.6 MPa (+143.8%) and 3.95 MPa (+62.6%) at 28 days. Regression modelling and ANOVA confirmed curing temperature as the dominant factor, while excessive activator content adversely affected performance. Durability evaluation of the control and optimum mixes showed progressive degradation under acid exposure, whereas sulphate immersion up to 90 days resulted in net strength gain with early mass increase (pore filling) followed by slight mass loss at longer exposure; drying shrinkage remained comparable between mixes (≈0.00158 at 90 days), indicating no shrinkage penalty for the optimized system. Multi-scale characterization (XRD, SEM–EDS elemental mapping, FTIR, XRF, and TGA/DTG–DSC) supported improved gel development and Ca-assisted densification in the KSSW-modified matrix. Overall, the results establish KSSW as a viable supplementary binder and demonstrate that strength-driven statistical optimization enables a resource-efficient, high-performance geopolymer mortar suitable for sustainable construction applications.

Keywords: Geopolymer mortar; Kota stone slurry waste; Taguchi optimization; Ultrasonic pulse velocity; Water absorption.

How to cite this article:
Pawan Patidar, Pawan Kalla, Pravesh Saini. Optimized Utilization of Kota Stone Slurry Waste in Fly Ash–Based Geopolymer Mortar: A Taguchi-Driven Approach. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(03):-.
How to cite this URL:
Pawan Patidar, Pawan Kalla, Pravesh Saini. Optimized Utilization of Kota Stone Slurry Waste in Fly Ash–Based Geopolymer Mortar: A Taguchi-Driven Approach. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(03):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2026/view=244616


References

[1] Ricciotti L, Frettoloso C, Franchino R, Pisacane N, Aversa R. Geopolymer Materials: Cutting-Edge Solutions for Sustainable Design Building. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2025;17. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU17167483.
[2] Zhang P, Zheng Y, Wang K, Zhang J. A review on properties of fresh and hardened geopolymer mortar. Compos B Eng 2018;152:79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2018.06.031.
[3] Zhang X, Li J, Yu Y, Wang H. Investigating the water vapor sorption behavior of bamboo with two sorption models. J Mater Sci 2018;53:8241–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-018-2166-Y.
[4] Wang J, Zhu L, Wan D, Xue Y. Research Progress and Trend Analysis of Solid Waste Resource Utilization in Geopolymer Concrete. Buildings 2025;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS15183370.
[5] Fahim Huseien G, Mirza J, Ismail M, Ghoshal SK, Abdulameer Hussein A. Geopolymer mortars as sustainable repair material: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017;80:54–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2017.05.076.
[6] Alhawat M, Ashour A, Yildirim G, Aldemir A, Sahmaran M. Properties of geopolymers sourced from construction and demolition waste: A review. Journal of Building Engineering 2022;50. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2022.104104.
[7] Naresh T, Mallik M, Venkateswara Rao S, Dubey S. Performance and microstructural optimization of sustainable geopolymer mortars using fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, and rice husk ash. Structural Concrete 2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/SUCO.70192.
[8] Boakye K, Khorami M. Impact of Low-Reactivity Calcined Clay on the Performance of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Mortar. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2023;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU151813556.
[9] Herbudiman B, Subari S, Nugraha B, Pratiwi I, Rinovian A, Widyaningsih E, et al. Effect of Different Ceramic Waste Powder on Characteristics of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer. Civil Engineering Journal (Iran) 2024;10:431–43. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-02-06.
[10] Ebrahim A allah M, Ahmed DA, Abu-Elwafa R. Development of an eco-friendly geopolymer mortar using slag and fly ash with high bentonite content for thermal and environmental applications. Sci Rep 2024;14. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-024-76780-5.
[11] Samuvel Raj R, Prince Arulraj G, Anand N, Kanagaraj B, Lubloy E, Naser MZ. Nanomaterials in geopolymer composites: A review. Developments in the Built Environment 2023;13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DIBE.2022.100114.
[12] Zerihun B. Nano-metakaolin-enhanced fly ash and cement-based geopolymer mortar. Journal of Material and Process Technologies 2024;1:23–7. https://doi.org/10.69660/JMPT.V1I1.62.
[13] Biricik H, Kırgız MS, Galdino AG de S, Kenai S, Mirza J, Kinuthia J, et al. Activation of slag through a combination of NaOH/NaS alkali for transforming it into geopolymer slag binder mortar – assessment the effects of two different Blaine fines and three different curing conditions. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 2021;14:1569–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2021.07.014.
[14] Felaous K, Aziz A, Achab M, Fernández-Raga M, Benzaouak A. Optimizing Alkaline Activation of Natural Volcanic Pozzolan for Eco-Friendly Materials Production: An Investigation of NaOH Molarity and Na2SiO3-to-NaOH Ratio. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2023;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU15054453.
[15] Salim MU, Moro C. Towards sustainable construction: Performance evaluation of slag-cenosphere geopolymers under different NaOH concentrations. Journal of Building Engineering 2024;91. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2024.109605.
[16] Guo L, Liu J, Zhou M, An S. Effect of an alkali activators on the compressive strength and reaction mechanism of coal gangue-slag-fly ash geopolymer grouting materials. Constr Build Mater 2024;426. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2024.136012.
[17] Çelikten S, Sarıdemir M, Soloğlu M. Effects of elevated temperatures and cooling regimes on the waste andesite dust-based geopolymer mortars. Constr Build Mater 2024;422. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2024.135857.
[18] Karaaslan C, Şek Ş, Turan C. Utilising High-Ambient-Temperature Curing in the Development of Low-Calcium Geopolymers. Buildings 2025;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS15162974.
[19] Usman Kankia M, Baloo L, Danlami N, Zawawi NA, Bello A, Muhammad SI. Microstructural Analysis and Compressive Strength of Fly Ash and Petroleum Sludge Ash Geopolymer Mortar under High Temperatures. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2023;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU15129846.
[20] Strzałkowski P, Król R, Kawalec W, Sówka I, Czajka KM. Characteristics of Waste Generated in Dimension Stone Processing. Energies 2021, Vol 14, Page 7232 2021;14:7232. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN14217232.
[21] Jalalian MH, Bagherpour R, Khoshouei M. Wastes production in dimension stones industry: resources, factors, and solutions to reduce them. Environ Earth Sci 2021;80:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12665-021-09890-2/METRICS.
[22] IS 383. Coarse and Fine Aggregate for Concrete – Specification. Bureau of Indian Standards 1970. https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.383.1970.pdf (accessed May 4, 2025).
[23] IS 2386-7. Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete, Part VII: Alkali Aggregate Reactivity. Bureau of Indian Standards 1963. https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.2386.7.1963.pdf (accessed July 10, 2024).
[24] Mariamah, Chairunnisa N, Nurwidayati R. The Effect of Natrium Hydroxide Molarity Variation and Alkali Ratio on the Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Paste and Mortar. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2023;1184. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1184/1/012025.
[25] Wardhono A, Risdianto Y, Sabariman B, Hidajati NW. The role of NaOH molarity on the strength performance of geopolymer mortar prepared by a combination of fly ash, rice husk ash, and kaolin at heat-cured condition. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2024;1416:012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1416/1/012044.
[26] Sunarsih ES, As’ad S, Mohd. Sam AR, Kristiawan SA. The effect of sodium hydroxide molarity on setting time, workability, and compressive strength of fly ash-slag-based geopolymer mortar. J Phys Conf Ser 2023;2556. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2556/1/012019.
[27] Enoh MKE, Ushie DO. Effect of Sodium Silicate to Hydroxide Ratio and Sodium Hydroxide Concentration on the Physico-Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Binders. East African Journal of Engineering 2023;6:113–21. https://doi.org/10.37284/EAJE.6.1.1361.
[28] Chenafi MH, Makhloufi Z, Bekkai AO, Berkak H. Enhancing the performance of sustainable geopolymers: Insights into liquid-to-solid and alkali ratios. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials 2025. https://doi.org/10.17515/RESM2025-635MA0122RS.
[29] Jeeva Chithambaram S, Sanjay Kumar, Prasad MM. Study on effect of sodium hydroxide concentration on geopolymer mortar. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 2019;25:651–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3317-0_58.
[30] Bhina MR, Liu KY, Hu JEHY, Tsai CT. Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Quick-Strength Geopolymer Material Considering Preheated-to-Room Temperature Ratio of Sand, Na2SiO3-to-NaOH Ratio, and Fly Ash-to-GGBS Ratio. Polymers (Basel) 2023;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM15051084.
[31] Öz HÖ, Doğan-Sağlamtimur N, Bilgil A, Tamer A, Günaydin K. Process development of fly ash-based geopolymer mortars in view of the mechanical characteristics. Materials 2021;14. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA14112935.
[32] Zhang Z, Huo Z, Yang Z, Wang X, Xia J. Curing Condition and NaOH Concentration on the Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Mortars. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology 2023;14:279–86. https://doi.org/10.30880/IJSCET.2023.14.01.025.
[33] Syavanka LN, Herwani H, Faisal F. Effect of Curing Temperature on Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete from Bengkayang Power Plant. Jurnal Teknik Sipil 2025;25:1748–58. https://doi.org/10.26418/JTS.V25I1.88504.
[34] Sunarsih ES, As’ad S, Mohd.Sam AR, Kristiawan S. The Effect of Alkali Activator to Binder Ratio on Workability, Density, and Compressive Strength of Fly Ash-Slag Based Geopolymer Mortar. Nano Hybrids and Composites 2024;45:121–7. https://doi.org/10.4028/P-MFE2JS.
[35] GholamReza Ahmadi. Shrinkage and Mechanical Resistance of Steel Fiber Reinforced Geopolymer Mortars Containing Industrial By-Product GGBS; Solution to Binder Affect in Oven Curing Condition. Power System Technology 2024;48:1274–90. https://doi.org/10.52783/PST.942.
[36] Khaleel Sk, Reddy DrLS. Enhancement of Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Ferrocement through Incorporation of a Novel Binder and through Optimization of Alkaline Activator Ratios. South East Eur J Public Health 2024:1081–8. https://doi.org/10.70135/SEEJPH.VI.1971.
[37] Saeki Y, Fujikake K, Sasatani T, Kuwahara N, Kuroiwa D. Development of Cast-in-Place FA-GGBFS-Based Geopolymer Mortar: An Experimental Study. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction 2022;27. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000681.
[38] Aslan S, Erkan İH. The Effects of Fly Ash, Blast Furnace Slag, and Limestone Powder on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Mortar. Applied Sciences 2024, Vol 14, 2024;14. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP14020553.
[39] Kogbara RB, Al-Zubi A, Mortada Y, Hammoud A, Masad EA, Khraisheh MK. Lime-activated one-part geopolymer mortars from construction, demolition and industrial wastes. Results in Engineering 2024;21:101739. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RINENG.2023.101739.
[40] Shaaban M, Hussien OF, Khalifa S. Characteristics and Microstructure of Geopolymer Mortars incorporating Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag and Calcined Dolomite Powder: A Sustainable Solution for Construction Materials. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research 2025;15:21791–9. https://doi.org/10.48084/ETASR.10095.
[41] Moreira PI, de Oliveira Dias J, de Castro Xavier G, Vieira CM, Alexandre J, Monteiro SN, et al. Ornamental Stone Processing Waste Incorporated in the Production of Mortars: Technological Influence and Environmental Performance Analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2022;14. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14105904/S1.
[42] Woźniak ZZ, Chajec A, Sadowski Ł, Woźniak ZZ, Chajec A, Sadowski Ł. Effect of the Partial Replacement of Cement with Waste Granite Powder on the Properties of Fresh and Hardened Mortars for Masonry Applications. Materials 2022, Vol 15, 2022;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA15249066.
[43] Doğan C, Demir İ. The Effect of Marble Powder and Fly Ash on Mechanical Properties of Cement Mortars. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 2021;21:1137–45. https://doi.org/10.35414/AKUFEMUBID.977280.
[44] Youssf O, Eldin DS, Tahwia AM, Youssf O, Eldin DS, Tahwia AM. Eco-Friendly High-Strength Geopolymer Mortar from Construction and Demolition Wastes. Infrastructures 2025, Vol 10, 2025;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/INFRASTRUCTURES10040076.
[45] IS 2250. Code of Practice for Preparation and Use of Masonry Mortars : Bureau of Indian Standards. 1981. https://doi.org/https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.2250.1981.pdf.
[46] ASTM C270. Specification for Mortar for Unit Masonry. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2025. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0270-25A.

Ahead of Print Subscription Original Research
Volume 14
03
Received 16/04/2026
Accepted 28/04/2026
Published 21/05/2026
Publication Time 35 Days
13

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics