Investigating the Influence of Process Parameters on Photochemical Machining of Phosphor Bronze Alloy Microchannels

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2026 | Volume : 14 | 02 | Page :
    By

    Pradnya Krishna Bhuse,

  • Sandeep Sitaram Wangikar,

  1. Research Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, SVERI’s College of Engineering, Pandharpur, Maharashtra, India
  2. Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, SVERI’s College of Engineering, Pandharpur, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

Microchannels are widely employed in microfluidic devices, biomedical systems, and compact heat exchangers, where their functional efficiency depends strongly on surface finish, dimensional control, and edge quality. Traditional machining techniques often face limitations in producing such features with the required precision, prompting the use of advanced micromachining methods. In the present work, photochemical machining (PCM) has been applied to fabricate serpentine-shaped microchannels in phosphor bronze. The study systematically investigates the effect of three process parameters—etchant concentration, etching duration, and solution temperature—on machining performance. Ferric chloride was employed as the etchant, and a full factorial design of experiments was used to develop the experimental framework. The fabricated samples were examined through optical microscopy to evaluate edge sharpness and surface smoothness. Statistical validation was carried out using analysis of variance (ANOVA) to quantify the influence of process variables. Results confirm that etchant concentration and temperature are the most significant contributors to etch rate and machining quality, while etching duration plays a secondary role. The study revealed that surface roughness (Ra) increased with higher etchant concentration, temperature, and etching time, whereas edge sharpness (ES) improved with concentration and temperature but declined with prolonged etching. Optimal conditions for the minimum Ra were achieved at a concentration of 250 g/L, 35 °C, and 5 minutes, while the lowest ES occurred at the same concentration and temperature, with 21 minutes of etching. Overall, the study demonstrates that careful optimization of PCM parameters can produce precise and reliable microchannels, making the process highly relevant for engineering and biomedical applications.

Keywords: Photochemical machining, surface roughness, microchannel, phosphorus bronze alloy, edge sharpness.

How to cite this article:
Pradnya Krishna Bhuse, Sandeep Sitaram Wangikar. Investigating the Influence of Process Parameters on Photochemical Machining of Phosphor Bronze Alloy Microchannels. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(02):-.
How to cite this URL:
Pradnya Krishna Bhuse, Sandeep Sitaram Wangikar. Investigating the Influence of Process Parameters on Photochemical Machining of Phosphor Bronze Alloy Microchannels. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2026/view=240176


References

  1. Gamage JR, DeSilva AKM. Assessment of research needs for sustainability of unconventional machining processes. Procedia CIRP. 2015;26:385–90. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.096
  2. Saraf AR, Sadaiah M, Devkare S. Optimization of photochemical machining. Int J Eng Sci Technol. 2011;1(3):7108–16.
  3. Yadav RP, Teli SN. A review of issues in photochemical machining. Int J Mod Eng Res. 2014;4(7):49–53.
  4. Patil O, Chanmanwar R. Investigation on enhancement in photochemical machining. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5(9):20336–42. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.408
  5. Bruzzone AAG, Reverberi AP. An experimental evaluation of an etching simulation model for photochemical machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 2010;59(1):255–8. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.070
  6. Zhang J, Meng Y. A study of surface texturing of carbon steel by photochemical machining. J Mater Process Technol. 2012;212(10):2133–40. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.05.018
  7. Cakir O. Copper etching with cupric chloride and regeneration of waste etchant. J Mater Process Technol. 2006;175(1–3):63–8. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.024
  8. Borate H, Utpat A. Effect of process parameters for photochemical machining of Munz metal. AIP Conf Proc. 2023;2716(1):[020006-1–020006-7]. doi:10.1063/5.0137363
  9. Ruhela, V., Ansari, M. I., Jadhav, P. V., Mohite, D. D., Patil, M. J., Dixit, P. A., & Harale, A. A. (2023). An experimental investigation of photo chemical machining process for stainless-steel material by using different etchants. Mater Today Proc. 2023;[in press / article ID 1-5]** doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.324
  10. Agrawal D, Kamble D. Optimization of photochemical machining process parameters for manufacturing microfluidic channel. Mater Manuf Process. 2019;34(1):1–7. doi:10.1080/10426914.2018.1512115
  11. Wangikar SS, Patowari PK, Misra RD, Gidde RR, Bhosale SB, Parkhe AK. Optimization of photochemical machining process for fabrication of microchannels with obstacles. Mater Manuf Process. 2021;36(5):544–57. doi:10.1080/10426914.2020.1843674
  12. Agrawal D, Kamble D. Effect and optimization of photochemical machining process parameters for manufacturing array of micro-hole. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2019;41(4):178. doi:10.1007/s40430-019-1678-y
  13. Wangikar SS, Chavan VR, Parkhe AK, Kashid DT, Jadhav CC, Gidde RR. Error analysis for microchannels fabrication using photochemical machining on brass. In: Recent Advances in Materials Technologies: Select Proceedings of ICEMT 2021. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 619–28. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-3895-5_50
  14. Agrawal D, Kamble D, Ambhore N. Parametric investigation of photochemical machining of SS-430 for manufacturing of micromesh. In: Adv Eng Forum. Vol. 43. Zurich: Trans Tech Publ; 2021. p. 1–16.
  15. Gangmei G, Kumar J, Debnath T, Patowari PK. Parametric analysis for machining of stainless steel AISI (SS-430) using photo chemical machining. In: Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering: Select Proceedings of ICRAME 2020. Singapore: Springer; 2021. p. 829–37. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-7711-6_82
  16. Kumar J, Debnath T, Patowari PK. Selective etching of aluminium 6068 using photochemical machining. In: Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering: Select Proceedings of ICRAME 2020. Singapore: Springer; 2021. p. 601–9. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-7711-6_60
  17. Tehrani AF, Imanian E. A new etchant for the chemical machining of St304. J Mater Process Technol. 2004;149(1–3):404–8. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.02.055
  18. Thorat S, Sadaiah M. Investigation on surface integrity of Co-Cr L605 alloy in photochemical machining. J Manuf Process. 2019;38:483–93. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.01.006
  19. Agrawal DP, Kamble DN. Experimental investigation in photochemical machining process through response surface methodology for manufacturing of micro mould. Int J Mechatronics Manuf Syst. 2019;12(2):116–39. doi:10.1504/IJMMS.2019.102948
  20. Kamble B, Utpat A, Misal ND, Ronge BP. 3D photochemical machining of copper by using colored phototools. Int J New Technol Res. 2019;5(7):12418–25. doi:10.31871/IJNTR.5.7.3
  21. Misal ND, Sadaiah M. Multi-objective optimization of photochemical machining of Inconel 601 using grey relational analysis. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5(2):5591–600. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.150
  22. Misal ND, Saraf AR, Sadaiah M. Experimental investigation of surface topography in photochemical machining of Inconel 718. Mater Manuf Process. 2017;32(15):1756–63.
  23. Patil DH, Mudigonda S. Investigation on effect of grain orientation in photochemical machining of Monel 400. Mater Manuf Process. 2017;32(16):1831–7.
  24. Patil DH, Thorat SB, Khake RA, Mudigonda S. Comparative study of FeCl₃ and CuCl₂ on geometrical features using photochemical machining of Monel 400. Proc CIRP. 2018; 68:144–9. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.084
  25. Saraf AR, Sadaiah M. Magnetic field-assisted photochemical machining (MFAPCM) of SS316L. Mater Manuf Process. 2017;32(3):327–32.
  26. Mudigonda S, Patil DH. Some investigations on surface texturing on Monel 400 using photochemical machining. In: Int Manuf Sci Eng Conf. Vol. 56826. New York: ASME; 2015 Jun. p. V001T02A045.
  27. Patil DH, Mudigonda S. The effect of the rolling direction, temperature, and etching time on the photochemical machining of Monel 400 microchannels. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2016; 2016:6751305. doi:10.1155/2017/3247873
  28. Wangikar SS, Patowari PK, Misra RD. Effect of process parameters and optimization for photochemical machining of brass and german silver. Mater Manuf Process. 2017;32(15):1747–55. doi:10.1080/10426914.2016.1244848
  29. Mumbare P, Gujar AJ. Multi-objective optimization of photochemical machining for ASME 316 steel using grey relational analysis. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2016;5(7):12418–25.
  30. Bhasme AB, Kadam MS. Parameter optimization by using grey relational analysis of photochemical machining. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2016;3(3):992–7.
  31. Fang J, Zhang Q, Zhang X, Liu F, Li C, Yang L, et al. Influence of etchants on etched surfaces of high-strength and high-conductivity Cu alloy of different processing states. Materials. 2024;17(9):1966. doi:10.3390/ma17091966
  32. Patil D, Thorat S, Sadaiah M. Study of the effect of PCM process parameters on geometry type, Ra, depth of etch, undercut comparing FeCl₃ and CuCl₂ etchants on Monel 400. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2024;10(3):1956–76. doi:10.1080/2374068X.2023.2205668
  33. Ruhela V, Ansari MI, Jadhav PV. An experimental investigation of photochemical machining process for stainless steel material by using different etchants. Mater Today Proc. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.324
  34. Kunar S, Jagadeesha T, Mandal G, Talib N, Singh AK, Veeranjaneyulu I. Photochemical machining. In: Advanced Machining and Micromachining Processes. Wiley; 2025. p. 203–14. doi:10.1002/9781394301744.ch14
  35. Thorat S, Patil DH, Sadaiah M, Sargade V. Investigation on surface topography in photochemical machining of Co–Cr L605 alloy using a new etchant for cell growth. Prog Eng Sci. 2025;2(3):100090. doi:10.1016/j.pes.2025.100090
  36. Yadav R, Jadhav T, Gadekar T, Patil V, Purandare P, Kulkarni A, et al. Experimental study on parameter evaluation of thin metal sheets using photochemical machining. J Integr Sci Technol. 2025;13. doi:10.62110/sciencein.jist.2025.v13.1119
  37. Samani FN, Esfahani ER. Experimental study of parameters in micro-photochemical machining using maskless digital projection on flat surfaces of 100Cr6 steel. J Micromanuf. 2025. doi:10.1177/25165984241306630
  38. Wangikar SS, Chavan VR, Parkhe AK, Kashid DT, Jadhav CC, Gidde RR. Error analysis for microchannels fabrication using photochemical machining on brass. In: Recent Advances in Materials Technologies: Select Proceedings of ICEMT 2021. Springer; 2022. p. 619–28. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-3895-5_5
Ahead of Print Subscription Original Research
Volume 14
02
Received 06/09/2025
Accepted 30/09/2025
Published 16/04/2026
Publication Time 222 Days
1

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics