AI-Driven Topology Optimization of Woven Fiber-Reinforced Composite Chassis Structures for Electric Vehicles Under Crash Loading

Year : 2026 | Volume : 14 | Issue : 02 | Page : 72 89
    By

    Sweety Jachak,

  • Pankaj Vispute,

  • Sapna Sonar,

  • Swapnil Ratnakar,

  • Piyush Bhamare,

  • Gokul Mahajan,

  • Krupal Pawar,

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Engineering, Guru Gobind Singh College of Engineering and Research Centre, SPPU, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Shatabdi Institute of Engineering and Research, SPPU, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
  3. Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, Shatabdi Institute of Engineering and Research, SPPU, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
  4. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shatabdi Institute of Engineering and Research, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
  5. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shatabdi Institute of Engineering and Research, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
  6. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shatabdi Institute of Engineering and Research, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
  7. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rajiv Gandhi College of Engineering, SPPU, Ahilyanagar, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

The structural design of an electric vehicle (EV) chassis represents a unique engineering challenge to achieve minimal weight while meeting occupants’ safety requirements during high-energy crash conditions without compromise to the battery housing’s integrity or the geometrical constraints of the electric powertrain package. In this paper, a single framework is proposed to integrate physics-based artificial intelligence (AI) surrogate models using PINNs, CNN-accelerated topology optimization, and FEA to design woven fiber-reinforced polymer (WFRP) composite chassis components that are optimized specifically for frontal, side, and rear crash loading conditions. Due to the complex interlocking geometry of the woven reinforcement and the manufacturing anisotropy of the fabric, the complex geometry and the anisotropy of the fabric are directly modeled in the constitutive relationship of the material and the AI surrogate. Starting with a three-dimensional design space discretized into 1.2 million hexahedral elements, the proposed pipeline significantly reduced the optimization wall clock time by 78% relative to the SIMP method while providing a 14.3% reduction in mass and an 11.7% increase in the specific energy absorption (SEA) of the WFRP chassis component relative to a similar mass steel reference structure. A progressive damage model was used to model the inter-fiber crack growth and the matrix crack growth under dynamic crushing of the fiber tow and the matrix. The progressive damage model incorporates the Hashin failure criterion and a modified Puck inter-fiber fracture model. The developed framework was verified by comparing the predicted response to drop tower test data and sled test data from a purpose-built EV prototype chassis, indicating that the prediction error of the peak crush force was less than 7.2%, and the prediction error of the SEA was less than 5.9%. These results indicate that AI-based composite topology optimization is ready to be deployed in industry as a tool for designing EV chassis components.

Keywords: Structural design, electric vehicle, PINNs, CNN-accelerated topology optimization, WFRP.

[This article belongs to Journal of Polymer & Composites ]

How to cite this article:
Sweety Jachak, Pankaj Vispute, Sapna Sonar, Swapnil Ratnakar, Piyush Bhamare, Gokul Mahajan, Krupal Pawar. AI-Driven Topology Optimization of Woven Fiber-Reinforced Composite Chassis Structures for Electric Vehicles Under Crash Loading. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(02):72-89.
How to cite this URL:
Sweety Jachak, Pankaj Vispute, Sapna Sonar, Swapnil Ratnakar, Piyush Bhamare, Gokul Mahajan, Krupal Pawar. AI-Driven Topology Optimization of Woven Fiber-Reinforced Composite Chassis Structures for Electric Vehicles Under Crash Loading. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(02):72-89. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2026/view=239543


References

  1. Abramowicz W, Jones N. Dynamic axial crushing of square tubes. Int J Impact Eng. 1984; 2(2): 179–208. DOI: 10.1016/0734-743X(84)90005-8
  2. Banga S, Gehani H, Bhilare S, Patel S, Kara L. 3D topology optimization using convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.07440. 2018. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1808.07440
  3. Benzeggagh ML, Kenane M. Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus. Compos Sci Technol. 1996; 56(4): 439–449. DOI: 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X
  4. Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1988; 71(2): 197–224. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2
  5. Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O. Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods, and Applications. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2003. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-05086-6
  6. Chamis CC. Mechanics of composite materials: Past, present, and future. J Compos Technol Res. 1989; 11(1): 3–14. DOI: 10.1520/CTR10143J
  7. Cox BN, Flanagan G. Handbook of analytical methods for textile composites. NASA Contractor Report 4750. 1997. DOI: 10.2172/383263
  8. Dávila CG, Camanho PP, Rose CA. Failure criteria for FRP laminates. J Compos Mater. 2005; 39(4): 323–345. DOI: 10.1177/0021998305046452
  9. European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP). NCAP 2025 Technical Bulletin TB 030: Frontal Full-Width Rigid Barrier Test Protocol. Brussels: Euro NCAP; 2024. Available from: https://www.euroncap.com/en/for-engineers/technical-documents/
  10. Feraboli P, Nordenholz T. Progressive failures of uni-directional carbon fiber/epoxy tubes under axial crush. J Compos Mater. 2007; 41(7): 907–929. DOI: 10.1177/0021998306065874
  11. Gürdal Z, Haftka RT, Hajela P. Design and Optimization of Laminated Composite Materials. New York: Wiley; 1999. ISBN: 978-0-471-25276-7
  12. Haghighat E, Raissi M, Moure A, et al. A physics-informed deep learning framework for inversion and surrogate modeling in solid mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2021; 379: 113741. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2021.113741
  13. Hashin Z. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J Appl Mech. 1980; 47(2): 329–334. DOI: 10.1115/1.3153664
  14. Huang X, Xie YM. Bi-directional evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures with one or multiple materials. Comput Mech. 2009; 43(3): 393–401. DOI: 10.1007/s00466-008-0312-0
  15. Jacob GC, Fellers JF, Simunovic S, Starbuck JM. Energy absorption in polymer composites for automotive crashworthiness. J Compos Mater. 2002; 36(7): 813–850. DOI: 10.1177/0021998302036007164
  16. Kang Z, Wang R, Li P. Topology optimization considering fracture mechanics behaviors at specified locations. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2017; 55(5): 1847–1864. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-016-1623-y
  17. Koerber H, Xavier J, Camanho PP. High strain rate characterisation of unidirectional carbon-epoxy IM7-8552 in transverse compression and in-plane shear using digital image correlation. Mech Mater. 2010; 42(11): 1004–1019. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2010.09.003
  18. Lei X, Liu C, Du Z, et al. Machine learning-driven real-time topology optimization under moving morphable component-based framework. J Appl Mech. 2019; 86(1): 011004. DOI: 10.1115/1.4041319
  19. Lin Q, Hong A, Liu J, et al. Investigation into the topology optimization for conductive heat transfer based on deep learning approach. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2018; 97: 103–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2018.07.001
  20. Long AC, Clifford MJ, Harrison P, Rudd C. Modelling of draping for woven fabrics. In: Long AC, editor. Composites Forming Technologies. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2007. pp. 50–79. DOI: 10.1533/9781845692537.1.50
  21. Lund E. Buckling topology optimization of laminated multi-material composite shell structures. Compos Struct. 2009; 91(2): 158–167. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.046
  22. Nguyen-Thanh VM, Nguyen LTK, Rabczuk T, Zhuang X. A deep energy method for finite deformation hyperelasticity. Eur J Mech A Solids. 2020; 80: 103874. DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.103874
  23. Park GJ. Technical overview of the equivalent static loads method for non-linear static response structural optimization. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2011; 43(3): 319–337. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-010-0530-x
  24. Patel MB, Choi H. Woven glass fiber reinforced polymer composite crush cans under low-velocity axial crash. Polym Compos. 2023; 44(6): 3841–3858. DOI: 10.1002/pc.27361
  25. Patel NM, Kang BS, Renaud JE, Tovar A. Crashworthiness design using topology optimization. J Mech Des. 2009; 131(6): 061013. DOI: 10.1115/1.3116256
  26. Pfaff T, Fortunato M, Sanchez-Gonzalez A, Battaglia PW. Learning mesh-based simulation with graph networks. Proc ICLR. 2021. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2010.03409
  27. Puck A, Schürmann H. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. Compos Sci Technol. 1998; 58(7): 1045–1067. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-6
  28. Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J Comput Phys. 2019; 378: 686–707. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
  29. Rosen DW. Computer-aided design for additive manufacturing of cellular structures. Comput Aided Des Appl. 2007; 4(5): 585–594. DOI: 10.1080/16864360.2007.10738493
  30. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI). LNCS vol. 9351. Springer; 2015. pp. 234–241. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
  31. Saeedi A, Rafiee R, Taheri-Behrooz RA. Progressive damage analysis of woven carbon fiber-reinforced polymer under high-velocity impact. J Compos Mater. 2023; 57(12): 1891–1910. DOI: 10.1177/00219983231165921
  32. Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, et al. Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Int J Comput Vis. 2020; 128: 336–359. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-019-01228-7
  33. Sigmund O. A 99 line topology optimization code written in MATLAB. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2001; 21(2): 120–127. DOI: 10.1007/s001580050176
  34. Sigmund O, Maute K. Topology optimization approaches: A comparative review. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2013; 48(6): 1031–1055. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6
  35. Sosnovik I, Oseledets I. Neural networks for topology optimization. Russ J Numer Anal Math Model. 2019; 34(4): 215–223. DOI: 10.1515/rnam-2019-0018
  36. Stegmann J, Lund E. Discrete material optimization of general composite shell structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2005; 62(14): 2009–2027. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1259
  37. Suresh K, Takalloozadeh M. Consistent formulation of structural topology optimization. Proc ASME IDETC/CIE. 2013. DOI: 10.1115/DETC2013-12584
  38. Tan RK, Nguyen NL, Zhu P. Multi-material topology optimization for automotive applications with crashworthiness and lightweight requirements. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2022; 65(11): 315. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-022-03425-y
  39. Tsai SW, Wu EM. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J Compos Mater. 1971; 5(1): 58–80. DOI: 10.1177/002199837100500106
  40. United Nations. UN Global Technical Regulation No. 20: Electric Vehicle Safety (EVS). UN ECE/TRANS/180/Add.20. Geneva; 2022. Available from: https://unece.org/transport/documents/2022/06/formal-documents/ecetrans180add20
  41. Vermaak MM, Michailidis G, Parry G, et al. On community approaches to the problem of topology and shape optimization for manufacturing. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2013; 48(3): 473–499. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-013-0907-8
  42. Wächter A, Biegler LT. On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math Program. 2006; 106(1): 25–57. DOI: 10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y
  43. Weaver PM, Ashby MF. The optimal selection of material and section-shape. J Eng Des. 1996; 7(2): 129–150. DOI: 10.1080/09544829608907931
  44. Williams G, Trask R, Bond I. Minimum mass vascular networks in multifunctional materials. J R Soc Interface. 2008; 5(18): 55–65. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2007.1022
  45. Xu W, Gutowski G. Sustainability and industry: Improving life-cycle energy efficiency and CO₂ emissions of fiber-reinforced composites. Compos B Eng. 2017; 113: 345–356. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.013
  46. Yang RJ, Chuang CH. Optimal topology design using linear programming. Comput Struct. 1994; 52(2): 265–275. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(94)90279-8
  47. Ye H, Shen Z, Meng A, et al. Machine-learning accelerated topology optimization of woven composite structures for crashworthiness. Compos Struct. 2023; 323: 117506. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117506
  48. Yildiz AR, Kaya N, Ozturk N, Alankus O. Optimal design of vehicle components using topology design and optimization. Int J Veh Des. 2004; 34(4): 387–398. DOI: 10.1504/IJVD.2004.004064
  49. Zhang W, Yuan J, Zhang J, Guo X. A new topology optimization approach based on Moving Morphable Components (MMC) and the ersatz material model. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2016; 53(6): 1243–1260. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-015-1372-3
  50. Zhou M, Fleury R, Shyy YK, et al. Progress in topology optimization with manufacturing constraints. Proc 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. Atlanta, GA; 2002. DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-5614
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 14
Issue 02
Received 05/03/2026
Accepted 16/03/2026
Published 01/04/2026
Publication Time 27 Days
50

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics